TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Thursday, 31 October 2013

Thursday, October 31, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:
What recovery? Households are no better off than during recession as incomes flatline and essential costs soar
Confirming what cash-strapped families have known for some time, the Office for National Statistics reported that real household disposable income has changed little since 2009, despite cumulative real GDP growth of 4.2% since then. Meanwhile, the cost of essentials such as housing, energy and water has soared. The definition of “real household disposable income” is the money households have left over after tax and benefits, adjusted to take into account inflation. The ONS said that the share of this money families spend on basic essentials has jumped from 19.9% in 2003 to 27.3% in 2013. Most of that squeeze is accounted for by housing, which now takes up 20.6% of disposable income compared to 14.7% ten years ago. The share taken up by gas and electricity has jumped 72% in ten years, despite us not using any more than we used to. DAILY MAIL

Energy firms 'overcharge by £3.7bn a year'
Some of Britain's biggest energy companies have been accused of raising households bills for no reason and systematically overcharging customers by £3.7bn a year, as they were grilled by MPs over their soaring prices and profits. The Big Six energy firms were also challenged by Stephen Fitzpatrick, the chief executive of small supplier Ovo Energy. As part of his evidence, he said: "When a customer calls their supplier and says I'm going to leave, they say hold on a moment, we've just found out we can save you £160. British Gas seems to be the most active, with a dedicated win-back team whose sole job it is to call people up and there's a terrible mistake, we've been overcharging you all this time and now we can cut your bill. When this kind of behaviour is allowed to go unchallenged, this ex-monopoly advantage by the Big Six goes unchallenged by Ofgem, we'll never get effective competition." GUARDIAN

British Gas rakes in £20m profit from overestimated bills, says whistleblower
A whistleblower said that £20m-worth of "credit balances" was put into the annual accounts of British Gas in one recent financial year. Under the current system, energy companies can estimate customers' future usage and charge accordingly. If less energy is used han was estimated, credit is built up which can be reclaimed or used to offset higher-than-expected future bills. However, if the customers change supplier and leaves, the existing supplier is supposed to return the credit; British Gas appears to have kept the money for themselves. GUARDIAN

HMRC’s £35bn estimate of tax dodging is 'tip of the iceberg'
HM Revenue & Customs is failing to make Google, Amazon and others pay up, says Margaret Hodge, chair of the MPs' public accounts committee. The committee accused HMRC of being too cosy with the tax dodging industry. Edward Troup, tax assurance commissioner at HMRC, was then asked if he really once wrote an article which said: "Taxation is legalised extortion." He confirmed that he had written it but said that it was in the 1990s. GUARDIAN

Pension fees cap plan unveiled by government
Pensions Minister Steve Webb said the government will launch a "full frontal assault" on pension fees. Management fees charged by pension providers could be capped between 0.75% and 1%, according to proposals being set out by the government. Some older schemes set up more than a decade ago have been charging up to 2.3% a year in management fees. With a 1% charge someone who initially saved £1,200 in the first year and worked for 46 years could lose almost £170,000 from their pension pot, and more than £230,000 with a 1.5% charge. So a saver with a 0.75% annual charge could end up £100,000 better off than if they had been charged a rate of 1.5%. This is part of an ongoing review of pension fees. Other fees exist on top of the management fee, which can take even more from your pension pot. BBC NEWS

Barclays in market manipulation investigation that could match scale of Libor scandal
Barclays is involved in the new investigation by global regulators into the potential manipulation of the £3tn-a-day currency markets, in a fresh setback for the bank as it attempts to clean up its reputation in the wake of the Libor rigging scandal. Barclays is joining a number of other banks – including Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank and UBS – in co-operating with the authorities and also shedding light on the nature of the investigation by regulators in the UK, the US and Asia. GUARDIAN

Barclays plans new pay package to circumvent EU banker bonus cap
Barclays is sounding out investors about a new structure for staff pay that would circumvent rules from Brussels. In addition to the existing components, a non-pensionable sum would be determined each year based on an individual's responsibilities. Paid each month in cash, this would supplement the employee's base salary but not be allowed to count towards the basic pay from which annual bonuses would be calculated. Under one scenario outlined by a leading Barclays investor, a senior executive in its investment bank could be paid a basic salary of £750,000, a maximum bonus - with shareholder approval - of £1.5m, and a sum running to hundreds of thousands of pounds paid in monthly instalments. SKY NEWS

PPI compensation payouts have given a better return than the stock market!
A financial journalist’s mum was mis-sold PPI by both the Halifax and the Co-op. She has now received her compensation: the premiums, plus interest paid on the premiums at 8% per year. Because she chose to pursue the claim herself rather than through a claims-management firm, she will keep the lot and has done better out of being mis-sold PPI than she could have done if she had invested the cash in the stock market or placed it into even the best-paying individual savings account. INDEPENDENT

Saturday, 26 October 2013

Saturday, October 26, 2013 Posted by Jake 2 comments Labels: , , ,
We are grateful to @KimBallard3 for suggesting this wonderful ditty by Richard Parry (inspired by Noel Coward (not by his banking skills)) entreating us all to be nice to bankers, ably accompanied on the piano by Pete Rosser

After all, even bankers have feelings. They may even have mothers who may even love them. Who knows?

Thursday, 24 October 2013

Thursday, October 24, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:
The so-called “good bank” JP Morgan fined $13,000,000,000
The unprecedented $13bn fine, imposed by US regulators, is expected to cover government charges and some compensation payments to firms and investors who bought mortgage-backed securities from Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. But the bank’s boss Jamie Dimon failed to convince regulators that the bumper payment should end criminal claims too. That means the bank – and possibly individual former staff – could still be open to cases from aggrieved buyers of the securities in the run up to the financial crisis. CITY AM

Eurobonds scandal: The high street giants avoiding millions in tax
The tax dodging retailers include Nando's, Pizza Express, Café Rouge, Strada, Pret A Manger, BHS, the electronics retailer Maplin, Office and Pets At Home. How the tax dodge works: instead of putting their money in the shares of the companies they buy, the owners - mostly private equity funds - lend it to them instead. The interest payments on the loans cuts these UK companies' taxable income each year and the exemption - triggered because the loans are listed on the Channel Islands Stock Exchange - means the interest goes to the owners tax free. INDEPENDENT

HS2 rail 'loser cities' revealed after report omitted figures
HS2 would make more than 50 places across the UK worse off - among them Aberdeen, Bristol and Cardiff - previously unseen research by accountants KPMG suggested. These are the places that would see HS2 divert existing business away from them. The findings were only released in a freedom of information request passed to the BBC's Newsnight programme. The chief executive of HS2 Ltd said the figures were unsurprising. BBC NEWS

Energy bill policy chaos: David Cameron now pledges to reverse 'green charges' on energy bills, but promises robust annual review of energy market
David Cameron has pledged to roll back "green charges" that add an average of £112 to energy bills, as he came under fire over Sir John Major's call for a windfall tax on the excess profits of Britain's big six energy companies. But the annual review is seen as evidence that the government is panicked by price rises and the reasons that the energy firms have given for them. Critics say the energy firms behave like a cartel, conceal their true profits and manipulate the cost of wholesale energy. Also, a parliamentary committee will examine the "reasons and justification" behind recent price rises, the difference of pricing policies between the firms, and how "the transparency of energy company profits can be improved". Gas and energy bills have risen by over 50% since 2007. GUARDIAN BBC NEWS

Wholesale energy prices 'not going up', says Ovo Energy
Wholesale prices are not going up in the energy industry, according to the head of a small energy firm, despite British Gas following SSE's rises with a 9.2% increase in its dual-fuel bill price. Stephen Fitzpatrick, MD and founder of Ovo Energy, said he had not seen wholesale prices rise for about two years. "If they're buying more expensive gas, more expensive electricity, in a large part we think this is because they're selling it to themselves". BBC NEWS

‘Big four' banks spend £500m on swaps mis-selling admin - but have only handed out £2m in compensation so far
Figures compiled by campaign group Bullybanks show that RBS, Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC have spent the huge sum on administration costs including setting up call centres and complaint handling staff. So far the big four have paid out £2m in 32 cases. About 30,000 firms are thought to have been mis-sold products. The banks have set aside about £2.8bn for compensation and administrative expenses. Some estimates put the final total bill at up to £10bn. DAILY MAIL

Government admits it does not know how well benefit cap is working
Mike Penning, a work and pensions minister, condemned a Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) report as "fundamentally flawed", after it estimated that only 10% of those hit by the cap in one London borough, Haringey, had secured jobs or increased their working hours. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) earlier insisted the benefit cap was "definitely helping" some of those affected to get into work. But the few capped claimants who had so far moved into employment were already "close to the labour market" and were likely to have got a job anyway, or were already working part-time and had increased their hours, according to Haringey jobcentre officials and charity job advisers interviewed by the CIH. GUARDIAN

Shoppers beware! Take supermarket price schemes with a pinch of salt - because they ALL claim they are the cheapest
The schemes run by Asda, Sainsbury's and Tesco compare the cost of shopping trips in different ways, making it difficult for shoppers to know if they are really bagging a good deal, an investigation by Which? found. The report is published on the same day that a television ad by Sainsbury's claiming that shoppers do not need to shop around to get the best deals at rivals Tesco and Asda is banned for being misleading. Which? said supermarkets set their own rules for what is and isn't compared under their schemes: they don't always include the same items and sometimes stock products in different sizes. Which? executive director Richard Lloyd said: 'Supermarket price-matching schemes can save you money but we believe they should be taken with a pinch of salt because they are difficult to compare. DAILY MAIL

Rip-off pensions: EU to make firms disclose hidden fees and charges that take up to 50% of your savings
A calculator that exposes how hidden fees eat into the returns on pensions and investments has gained approval from the European Parliament. The new law is expected to be passed next year. Fund groups, investment brokers, and other intermediaries would be asked to provide data for the tool. This would enable investors to see charges that were previously hidden, such as trading costs on buying and selling shares. In the UK up to half your pension savings can be taken in fees and charges. TELEGRAPH
Thursday, October 24, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , , ,
The banks' Interest Rate Swaps scam ruined businesses across the UK. Having explained how 'interest rate swaps' work and why they were sold in previous posts, we asked the undercover banker Honestly Banking to tell how the banks have managed to get themselves made judge and jury in the processing of compensation claims.

Fantastic, amazing, a triumph! That's really the only way you can describe the FCA review of Interest Rate Swap mis-selling. The wonderful thing about it is that the banks that did the mis-selling have got to design, run and review the scheme. Yes that's right, the very banks that did the mis-selling are conducting their own 'independent' review. What's even better is that the 'independent' oversight is by litigation lawyers who are in the pay of the banks[1]and will use the review process to gather evidence that can be used in litigation against the very people the banks originally mis-sold to.

Admit it, you've got to admire us clever bankers. We've even persuaded the FCA to state publicly that those businesses who have been devastated by the mis-selling of swaps don't need to take any legal advice![2]

“The IRHP review has been set up to deliver fair and reasonable redress to customers where appropriate without them needing to hire lawyers or claims management companies” 
FCA advice

The mis-sale of the Swap went so well first time, why not remove legal representation from the clients as well? What’s better is the banks got a top-secret agreement with the FCA[3], so there’s no oversight of the cosy arrangement we’ve got!

Banks decide who is eligible for redress:
Let's look at how this shrewd scheme works. Firstly the bank decides whether you’re eligible or not to use the scheme. Sneakily the banks use different criteria than normal to exclude those that might cost us a lot of money and the FCA accepted it[4]- result! We decide that you’re 'sophisticated' so you're stuffed – get out and take your swap with you (and don’t dare cancel that direct debit!). Good that gets rid of some of the problem. What's even funnier is we've got the FCA to state that these clients can use the FOS (ombudsman) for redress – but actually if they have more than 10 employees (which is probably why they were deemed ‘sophisticated’ in the first place) they are not eligible to use this either[5]- a stroke of genius!

“Independent” case reviews:
Then we get our 'independent reviewers', giant law firms, to deploy their experienced litigators to cross-examine the clients[6], sorry, not supposed to do that, 'interview' for several hours. We don't give them any of the bank's side of the story, but we get them to spill the beans and get them to admit that they really wanted the Swap and to incriminate themselves so that we can use the recordings in litigation if needs be. Our clever PR people have decided to call this an 'open transparent' process and not to bother to explain the legal ramifications to the mis-sold customers, who have been told not to bother with lawyers after we suggested it to the FCA[7].

“Independent” assessors:
Once the reviewers have got what the evidence need, we then use our army of 'independent' assessors to review the cases and decide if and what redress is due. We've hired in these ex-bankers, many of whom have been made redundant on day rates of £1000+ a day[8], so they had better reach the right conclusion or we will kick them out. Cleverly our HR people have made these assessors set up Ltd companies, so we can limit our liabilities if they are found to have been unprofessional or incompetent.

Redress and Compensation:
We are really pleased with the redress we are giving out. We've taken a leaf out of the best high street retailers book and try and give them a replacement product[9]- what's even funnier is that it's often as bad or worse than the original swap! And it has maybe double the profit in it for us! Also the client who we sold the wrong product to has to accept our advice again - it went so well first time!  We cooked up a wheeze whereby we can ensure these still have a load of break costs and might not be needed anyway. We've also conveniently neglected to build in an appeals process[10], so the client has to accept our findings. Aren’t we smart?!

Delaying claims beyond the limitation date:
Another tactic that's been working well is delaying the claims of customers so they pass the limitation date[11]where they can take legal action against us. It's been a real winner here; especially since the FCA have supported us by telling clients they don't need lawyers. Thousands have fallen for this trick! Of course some will want to go to court, we're not stupid, so we will settle the strong cases on the court steps (there goes another gagging order![12]), but we will let the weak ones go to trial, using the ‘evidence’ we squeezed out of them during the ‘review’ process and then we'll get our legal chaps to make mincemeat of them and get a precedent in our favour. The other good thing is those dear folks at the Financial Ombudsmen really haven't got a clue about all of this, so they are using their default client letter[13]that find in our favour.

Gagging orders:
As you would expect it's not all been easy. We've had to pay out a few times, but we've used gagging orders specially made by our legal friends. The FCA doesn’t allow us to do this as part of the redress scheme, so to get round this we just take this client out of the scheme. We think so little of the clients anyway, we don't mind chucking a bit of extra money to shut them up. We've planned for this already, but we are a bit worried that the stockmarket will be spooked if they know the real size of our provisions[14].

Consequential loss compensation:
Actually we are pretty worried about the consequential loss claims – i.e. compensating clients for anything from loss of profits to the total collapse of their businesses. But the FCA is being very helpful[15], doing their best to discourage consequential loss claims citing time delays, complexity and emphasising the general futility. The FCA has also given us a get-out-of-jail card saying we don’t have to compensate investors and guarantors – so your friends and family who put money into your business can get stuffed.  It’s times like this you know who your friends are. Our mates at the FCA are trying to keep compensation down to us returning interest payments (minus interest payments that would have been paid had we sold the client a less dodgy loan at the time). If we were selling dodgy brake pads that made clients’ cars crash, the FCA would tell the client to forget their wrecked car and injuries and just accept a new set of brake pads from us as compensation.

The Vampires
If there’s a business that’s causing us lots of trouble, or they have some lovely assets we fancy, we have a terrific plan. Firstly we make the business breach some of their lending covenants by using hidden calculations (often in their Swaps) and then put the distressed business into what’s known as ‘business support’ or ‘global restructuring’ and then we use team of specially trained ‘vampire’ bankers to suck out all of the value. Once we’ve extracted as much money as we can, we get our tame valuers to down value the business - we then dispose of it at a profit![16]

Organised resistance:
Those pesky people at Bully Banks[17]are a pain. They keep on pointing out our dirty tricks and talking to the press and politicians. Looks like they rumbled us on embedded 'hidden swaps at Clydesdale'[18], but hopefully we can pull a few strings to keep the lid on that. We also got some flak as we've only settled 10 cases after 14 months of 'redress'. The FCA stupidly said it would take 12 months, but since we decided when the clock started we should be ok. We've also been hiring people who are causing us trouble - the FCA has proved a good hunting ground, our mate Hector Sants has their mobile numbers and if we offer them enough they will move and keep stum.

Bonuses all round!
All in all, the swaps thing has worked well. We've made loads of money out of it[19]. Some bad publicity, but what do you expect? The FCA have been naive and compliant and none of us are in jail. We're still the masters of the universe! - Bonuses all round!




[3] As confirmed by Martin Wheatley, CEO of FCA, to BBC Panorama, October 2013, http://www.bbc.co.uk/i/b03dz52t/?t=15m56s
[5] Only micro business with less than 10 employees or turnover of less than 2 Million Euros can use the FOS, http://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/financial-services-products/banking/interest-rate-hedging-products/questions?category=complaintsfinancial-ombudsman-service
[6] Op Cit [2]
[7] Op Cit [2]



Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 Posted by Jake 5 comments Labels: , , , , ,
This is no laughing matter, so lets skip the levity. OFGEM, one of the few organisations in Britain that manages to make the FCA (formerly the FSA) not look uniquely cowardly and incompetent, has published some useful data! 

Is it OFGEM's Wikileaks moment? Is it a fat-finger accident? Or did they actually mean to publish this useful information?

We like to think the best of everybody (we really do!) so lets assume they did this intentionally.


Anyway, for the first time OFGEM is explicitly publishing wholesale energy cost data. The data explicitly and independently shows the energy companies have been telling porkies about the rise in open market wholesale prices in recent years.

OFGEM data for the period September 2011 to October 2013 shows that since September 2011
  • Wholesale electricity price has gone up by just over 2%. NPower and British Gas have raised prices by nearly 30%
  • Wholesale gas price has gone up by 8%. NPower and British Gas have raised prices by upto 35%.



To add insult to penury, because the wholesale cost makes up half the bill the mathematics says the percentage increase in bills should be half the percentage increase in wholesale cost.  i.e. over the last 2 years wholesale costs would justify an extra 1% for electricity and 4% for gas.

As the director of OVO, one of those teensy independent energy companies, said about the Big Six in a BBC interview in October 2013:

"If they're buying more expensive gas, more expensive electricity, in a large part we think this is because they're selling it to themselves".

He should know, because OVO is not vertically integrated (i.e. can't buy wholesale energy from itself). So it actually does buy energy on the open wholesale market.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Tuesday, October 22, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , ,

SOURCE CONSUMER FUTURES: Percentage change in average energy bills since 2007. Timings of energy suppliers' price changes. Current prices.

SOURCE GUARDIAN: The energy secretary, Ed Davey, called on electricity and gas suppliers to act rapidly to reveal their true profitability to customers and the energy regulator, as the government spent another day on the defensive over soaring bills. He said: "We need more transparency from the big six." He argued that companies such as Centrica, which owns British Gas, "need to be held to account for the profits they make and they need to declare them in a much clearer way".

OUR RELATED STORIES:
Tuesday, October 22, 2013 Posted by Jake 6 comments Labels: , , , , ,
The government's answer to gouging energy companies is to switch. In David Cameron's words:

“There is something everyone can do, which is look to switch their electricity or gas bill from one supplier to another.”

Cameron, washing his hands of the matter, says you're on your own - run for it! He would have us jump from one frying pan into another frying pan! 

Information on price rises from the Consumer Futures website reveals the futility of switching. The cheapest electricity provider is hardly ever also the cheapest gas provider. And while British Gas has offered the least shocking deal on electricity most of the time in recent years their suffocating gas tariff will have given you a right roasting overall. Taking gas and electricity prices separately there is a hundred or so pounds difference a year between lowest and highest. But taking both together the Big Six march a very disciplined pricing goosestep. Whoever you are with you will get a kicking.



Switching is not the answer. The energy companies operate like a wolf pack. Switching merely lets you choose which wolf will bite you. The answer is to blow away all hot air and smokescreens deployed by energy companies to disguise their rip-offs. Hot air that is inhaled and exhaled uncritically by politicians, regulators, and the media. When in 2011 OFGEM's own consultants BDO showed them how to bring greater transparency to the market, OFGEM decided not to.

And what about the energy companies' contention that they are forced to put up prices because of government imposed taxes and wholesale prices? We'll come to that in a separate post, click here.

[We are grateful to @pumps1000_ian who pointed us in the direction of the Consumer Futures data on gas & electricity price changes]

Sunday, 20 October 2013

Sunday, October 20, 2013 Posted by Jake 3 comments Labels: , ,
At the Tory party conference in October 2013 David Cameron claimed HS2 "is about bringing north and south together" creating centres of excellence outside London. Cameron proclaimed:


"This country has been too London-centric for far too long. That’s why we need a new North-South railway line. The fact is this. The West Coast mainline is almost full. We have to build a new railway and the choice is between another old-style Victorian one – or a high speed one."

In fact a study done by the HS2 organisation in March 2012 found the greatest beneficiary of the proposed line would be London. The report states:


"It can be seen from Table 2.1 that growth from all GOR [Government Office Regions] to London is especially high, and that growth away from London, whilst not as fast is higher than between most GOR’s. This is because PDFH4.1 [the passenger demand model used in the report] associates high income elasticity on flows to London, and this elasticity increases with distance"


HS2 route map by Cnbrb
In short, because people can gain a higher income in London they will travel there. HS2 spreads London's tentacles wider. The BBC managed to dig out data on the 'winners and losers' of HS2, using a Freedom of Information request. The raw data they found conceals just how big a winner London is by reporting "London Central" seperately from London West; London South West; London South East; London South/Croydon; London North East; London North.




The graph below shows what happens when you combine the London regions:



Friday, 18 October 2013

Chris, Fee and KJ wonder whether Michael Gove has been over-reaching himself...



SOURCE GUARDIAN: Teachers' strike: unions claim success as hundreds of schools close

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Thursday, October 17, 2013 Posted by Jake 2 comments Labels: , , ,
Channel4 News report:

"Small businesses have told Channel 4 News that when their property assets were seized by RBS they were sold off at auction to another arm of the business called West Register.

The bank has sold properties belonging to debtors at below-market value after suddenly withdrawing credit.

Property developer Chris Kashourides had a building in north London sold off for just £415,000 when the bank unexpectedly gave him seven days to pay off his overdraft in 2010.

Four months later the property was resold on the open market for more than £1 million. Mr Kashourides was forced to sell 25 more of his properties at reduced prices thanks to pressure from the lender."





Thursday, October 17, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:
People at foodbanks give back food that needs cooking because they can’t afford to turn on the electricity
The Trussell Trust is calling for an inquiry after they registered a tripling in foodbank usage. Over 350,000 people received three days’ emergency food from Trussell Trust foodbanks between April and September 2013, triple the numbers in the same period last year. They say that UK hunger is getting worse and the charity is calling for an inquiry into the causes of UK food poverty. Food prices have risen by 12.6% above inflation over the past six years and rising energy prices this winter are likely to see more people forced to choose between eating and heating. But a government spokesperson said: "The Trussell Trust itself says it is opening three new food banks every week, so it's not surprising more people are using them." BBC NEWS TRUSSELL TRUST

Red Cross launches emergency food aid plan for UK’s hungry – the first time since the Second World War
The Red Cross will this winter start collecting and distributing food aid to the needy in Britain for the first time since the Second World War, as welfare cuts and the economic downturn send soaring numbers of people to soup kitchens and food banks across Europe. Its volunteers will go into supermarkets across the country at the end of November and ask shoppers to donate dry goods. Across Europe, the Red Cross recorded a 75% increase in the number of people relying on their food aid over the last three years. At least 43m people across the Continent are not getting enough to eat each day and 120m are at risk of poverty. INDEPENDENT

0.7% average pay rise is barely over a quarter of inflation rate
The Office for National Statistics said total pay rose at an annual rate of just 0.7%. Excluding bonuses, pay growth was marginally stronger, at just 0.8% – the weakest figure since comparable records began in 2001. Inflation was running at 2.7% in August. Also, the drop in unemployment has not yet been reflected in the kind of pick-up in wage growth economists have been hoping for to translate the early signs of recovery into a solid upturn. Young people appear to have been left on the sidelines with unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds almost unchanged at 958,000 between June and August. GUARDIAN

Google Funnels More Billions To Bermuda
The US internet giant shifted €8.8bn of royalty payments to Bermuda last year, 25% more than in 2011. It’s a strategy that has saved Google billions of dollars in tax. Because Google books almost all of its foreign income through Ireland, the company has been able to capitalise on differences between the US and Irish tax codes to move the profits from Ireland to Bermuda. Other big brand business facing public wrath include Starbucks and Amazon. In June this year, MPs on the Public Accounts Committee recommended HMRC investigate Google’s tax affairs after it paid just £10m in tax despite generating £11.5bn in revenue from the UK in 2012. David Cameron said he was ‘determined’ to put an end to the ‘secretive companies in secretive locations’ which cost billions of pounds in lost tax revenues. MANAGEMENT TODAY

More energy price rises expected after SSE’s 8.2% increase in energy bills
SSE said its average annual dual fuel energy bill would rise by £106 to £1,380 on 15 November. SSE blamed the rise on the higher costs of buying wholesale energy and paying to deliver it to customers' homes, plus government taxes. Energy firms say their 5% profit margin is reasonable. But critics say the “Big 6” energy firms conceal their profits in their parent companies from whom they buy their gas, and operate as a cartel. BBC NEWS

Ofwat plans to block Thames Water's price rise
Thames had asked to add an extra £29 to the annual average household bill. Thames say it has faced extra costs of £291m, because various items have cost more than the amount estimated when the price regime was set in 2009. These include bad debts, the transfer of private sewers, land purchases and higher Environment Agency charges. Every five years, Ofwat sets the prices that water companies can charge. Ofwat said it had now looked at the evidence that Thames Water had provided and that although the company did face higher costs, they were not high enough to trigger a price rise. Ofwat's previous agreement with Thames allows it to increase charges by 1.4% above inflation in 2014-15. BBC NEWS

MPs to probe 'underpriced' Royal Mail sale
Some members of the Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee (BIS) want to interview executives from the syndicate of banks responsible for pricing Royal Mail's initial public offering (IPO) at 330p-per-share. Following a 38% jump on Friday, the postal operator's shares closed up 4% on Monday, valuing the company at 475p-a-share, or £4.75bn - almost £1.5bn more than the level at which the Government decided to privatise it. On Saturday, the Financial Times reported that the Government had examined whether it could raise the price at which shares in Royal Mail were sold but that institutions threatened to withdraw if ministers attempted to do so. SKY NEWS

New breed of bank overdrafts as expensive as payday loans, claims Which? as it calls for crackdown on 'sky high' charges
Which? also found consumers were racking up ‘sky high’ default charges for slipping over their agreed overdraft limit with their bank. It found that even bank charges on agreed overdrafts were sometimes as high as payday loan charges - with Halifax and Santander current accounts among the most expensive. Customers borrowing £100 over one month with Halifax within an agree overdraft were charged £30 for the period (an effective annual percentage rate of 356%), while Santander charged £20. Borrowing the same amount for the same period with payday lenders Quickquid or Wonga costs £20 and £37 respectively. Richard Lloyd, Which? executive director, said: ‘The Government and regulators have rightly focused on the scandal of payday lending, but they must not lose sight of the urgent need to clean up the whole of the credit market. High street bank overdraft fees can be just as eye-watering as payday loans.” DAILY MAIL

Reforms of banking system don't go far enough and put recovery at risk, says Banking Commission chief
Andrew Tyrie, the chairman of the Parliamentary Commission into Banking Standards, as well as the Treasury Select Committee, said the Government was ignoring important parts of the Commission’s recommendations and in some cases favouring non-binding guidelines over proper legislation. He said the Government's plan to regulate banks' leverage ratios - the total amount of money they lend to borrowers versus the capital they hold - which the Commission described as ‘the single most important tool to deliver a safer and more secure banking system’ was one area where the ministers were fudging the issue. He also raised concerns that powers to claw back bankers' bonuses were not being written into law and that regulators would not get new powers to intervene at banks where leadership may be failing. Mr Tyrie has complained before that significant changes to the Banking Reform bill were being rushed through so it could become law in 2014. DAILY MAIL

British shoppers are being fooled over where their cheese is made, warns Dairy Crest boss
The group’s chief executive, Mark Allen, is pushing for straightforward labelling of where cheese is made to replace current rules. At present, shoppers do not have to be informed in the case of cheese which is sliced and packaged. The EU only requires that the packaging shows where the last significant stage of processing took place, meaning imported Cheddar can be cut into smaller pieces in the UK, packaged, and given a UK health mark. The British Cheese Board (yes, that’s their name!) has also been lobbying the Government for clearer indications of where cheese was made. DAILY MAIL

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Tuesday, October 15, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments

SOURCE INDEPENDENT: Red Cross launches emergency food aid plan for UK’s hungry – the first time since the Second World War
The Red Cross will this winter start collecting and distributing food aid to the needy in Britain for the first time since the Second World War, as welfare cuts and the economic downturn send soaring numbers of people to soup kitchens and food banks across Europe. Its volunteers will be mobilised to go into supermarkets across the country at the end of November and ask shoppers to donate dry goods. Across Europe, the Red Cross recorded a 75% increase in the number of people relying on their food aid over the last three years. At least 43m people across the Continent are not getting enough to eat each day and 120m are at risk of poverty.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Graphs at a glance: Government's "Help To Buy" won't help those struggling to buy a house. But it will help people with rich parents!




Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us