TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!
Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 June 2014

Tuesday, June 24, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , ,
  • Germany has much lower ticket prices
  • German clubs are owned by their fans
  • German clubs depend on sponsorship, not high ticket prices
  • German clubs think long-term

Germany has much lower ticket prices
Ticket prices are low in the Bundesliga: the average price for the cheapest tickets is just over £10. In the Premier League, fans pay upwards of £28 for the cheapest tickets.

At Bayern Munich, you can get in (albeit to stand) for £12. Contrast those prices with £30 at the cheap end in Manchester United.

For a season ticket, it averages £207 in Germany's top-flight games compared with £468 in England. These figures come from a High Pay Centre report which looks at figures up to 2011.

Let’s compare the basics of the Premier and the Bundesliga champions. Deloittes did a comparison in 2012, from where we source the figures (SOURCE: Deloitte Football Money League 2012):
Manchester United:
Bought by the American Glazer family for £790m in 2005 in a controversial deal which loaded the club with debt. Since 2012 10% of its shares have been listed in New York.
Revenues = £331.4m, Cheapest season ticket price = £532
Bayern Munich:
Run as private company it is 82%-owned by its fans, with the sports goods firm Adidas and car company Audi holding just over 9% each.
Revenues = £290.3m, Cheapest season ticket price = £67

When Uli Hoeness, the president of Bayern Munich, was asked why the club didn't have higher ticket prices, like they do in England, he said: "We do not think the fans are like cows to be milked. Football has got to be for everybody. That's the biggest difference between us and England."

The columns below show how the demographic of a typical Premier League fan has been changing. It also shows how it differs from the average for all the UK leagues. (NOTE: The shaded columns at each end represent the average for all the leagues; A1 = higher managerial, administrative or professional class, DE = semi and unskilled manual workers, state pensioners, casual or lowest grade workers.)

(NOTE: despite the big differences between the UK and German leagues, on the subject of fat cat tax evasion, Germany and the UK are much the same. Uli Hoeness, an icon of German club soccer, former player and medal winner in Euro 1972 and the 1974 World Cup, began a 3 year and 6 months jail sentence for tax evasion in June 2014. BBC NEWS)


German clubs are owned by their fans
In the Premier League, assorted billionaires own the top clubs (Manchester United - the Glazer family; Manchester City - Sheikh Mansour; Chelsea - Roman Abramovich).

In Germany, there is the "50 + 1" rule, whereby the association or club has to have a controlling stake so that commercial interests can't gain control. At Bayern Munich, for example, Audi and Adidas each own 9% but the rest is controlled by the members via the club.

Above all, German clubs are genuine clubs: formally constituted associations with members who elect officials. In the UK the top clubs are listed companies, or largely privately owned.

As a result, German Bundesliga clubs do not carry huge debts, like UK Premiership clubs. They rely much more on incomes generated and then invested in the game.

According to the 2012 accounts for Manchester United plc, it is registered in the Cayman Islands tax haven and listed on the New York stock exchange. United remain burdened with £420m debt from the Glazers' 2005 takeover, at approximately 8.5% interest, which cost the club £50m last year. The takeover has cost United around £550m altogether. In 2013 the club paid a £10m dividend to the owners, a £3m management fee to the Glazers, and £558,484 interest was payable to Kevin Glazer.

German clubs depend on sponsorship, not high ticket prices
In Germany the members elect the president. With lower incomes from tickets, German clubs tend to put more weight on sponsorship deals, and tend to form close associations over the long term with local firms.

Bayern gets 55% of its revenue from commercial deals with companies compared with 37% from that source for Manchester United. British clubs tend to get a bigger slice of their income from the fans.

Despite these different was of generating revenue, Manchester United’s total revenue is typically only 10% higher than Bayern’s.

German clubs think long-term
Many Premier League clubs run at a loss. Most Bundesliga clubs run at a profit.

According to Twentyfour7 Football magazine, Bundesliga clubs made a profit of £47m last season while the Premier League made a loss of £207m, even though the income to the British league was higher (£2.4bn) than to German clubs (£1.78bn).

In the Bundesliga wages are 38% of the clubs' revenue while the in Premier League it is 67%.
 

German clubs do buy stars. Bayern Munich bought Borussia Dortmund midfielder Mario Gotze (a German) for a reported €37m (£31.5m). But they also groom youngsters. Following the German national team’s humiliating elimination at the group stage of Euro 2000, Bundesliga clubs have since spent a total of £610 million on youth academies.

It’s clear that the Premiership business model is not to dominate world football, it’s merely to dominate English football – or should I say the English football business. The top four or five Premiership clubs use their huge spending power to buy players, win games, win sponsorship and win TV rights. When it comes to English football the game is really over before it’s even begun. We know who the real winners are: everyone but the fans.


PRIMARY SOURCE: BBC NEWS

Tuesday, 1 April 2014

Tuesday, April 01, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , ,

SOURCE BBC NEWS: World Cup 2014: England shirts' £90 price tag 'takes the mickey'
The Football Association has been criticised after new England replica shirts were put on sale for up to £90. The previous Nike home kit has only been around since last May, a total of seven England matches. Shadow Sports Minister Clive Efford said "The frequency with which these kits are changed adds to the expense. When it comes to buying for more than one child it gets extremely expensive and people on moderate or low incomes are excluded from that privilege." A Football Supporters' Federation spokesman said: "Fans with kids often argue that strips are changed too often. The FSF would advocate manufacturers incorporating a 'best before' date into the strip's label. Supporters buying a strip would then know exactly what they're paying for and be able to make a decision based on that."

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Saturday, 25 August 2012

Saturday, August 25, 2012 Posted by Hari 2 comments Labels: , ,
Our guest post from the High Pay Centre summarises their full report "Football Mad: are we paying more for less?", which is well worth a read too. You can see data that shows how money is being sucked away from grassroots football and into the pockets of players in the top clubs. No wonder our national team hardly ever gets beyond a quarter final, if that!

It's also an example of how one business sector can end up dominated by a small handful  (think Man U, Man C, Arsenal, Chelsea) so powerful that all the others are crowded out. Other clubs can only hope to rise above them by paying their players massive amounts of money.


Much of that money is borrowed. In UEFA’s 2010 benchmarking report, the UK Premier League’s cumulative debt was £3.5bn, 56% of the combined debt owed by the 732 top flight clubs across Europe. Manchester City (a club that currently spends more on players than it earns) won the league on the last game of the season with two goals scored during injury time, scored by players with a combined purchase price greater than the entire turnover for half of the teams they were playing against in the league.



In the last 20 years of English football over half of its professional clubs have been insolvent. When clubs do go into insolvency the rules are that the players’ salaries must be honoured first, after which everyone else gets paid what's left over. So, for example, when Portsmouth entered its first administration in 2010, local business lost £400,000 in unpaid debts. At Darlington in 2009, unsecured creditors like local businesses received 0.0009% of what they were owed, and HMRC (that's you and me!) were owed £404,376 but got just £3.64– not even enough to buy a couple of pints to celebrate. In its 2012 windup CVA, Portsmouth's unsecured creditors were offered 2p in the pound.

There are other sectors that are totally dominated by a small handful of companies. Think banks, energy, telecoms, and rail. As the full report says, when it comes to football the game is really over before its even begun, and regardless of the outcome, we already know who the real winners will be.

Football Mad: are we paying more for less?


Research from the High Pay Centre shows how dramatic wage escalation in football has made the game less competitive and more expensive to watch, while also channelling the vast sums of money coming into the game from TV money to casinos and Mercedes dealerships, rather than grassroots coaching.
Clubs competing in the Champions League receive in excess of £200 million in revenue, more than double the amount earned by smaller Premier League clubs. Most of this money goes straight into the pocket of expensive new signings, with Manchester City, for example, spending 114% of turnover on players' wages.

The net result is that the supposedly exciting and unpredictable Premier League has become depressingly uncompetitive. In the past three seasons, a club finishing in the bottom three has beaten a side finishing in the top three on just four occasions out of 54. Statistically, last season’s Bolton Wanderers team could have played their Manchester United counterparts 10 times and would not expect to beat them once.

It’s a similar story between the divisions. Prior to the establishment of the Premier League, 50% of TV revenues were distributed across all 92 football league clubs. Today far smaller payments are made at the discretion of the Premier League, with the money again being spent on players' wages instead. Premier League players earnings have risen by 1508% since 1992, compared with 518% in the second tier, 306% in the third and 233% in the fourth (not to mention 186% across the population as a whole).

As a result, only one team, Norwich City, achieved promotion to the top flight in the last five years without either receiving the ‘parachute payments’ available to ex-Premier League clubs or running at a desperately unsustainable wages to turnover ratio of over 100%. Half the professional clubs in England have been insolvent at some point in the last 20 years.

The most depressing thing about all this is that the negative effect of pay escalation on the England football team is not insignificant. The bi-annual navel-gazing over the poor technique of English footballers that greets our early exit from every major tournament can be traced back to our lack of investment in coaching. In England there are 812 registered players to every qualified coach. In Germany, it’s 150, despite the fact that German league rules dictate that clubs must run on a breakeven basis, and their ticket prices are lower, meaning there is less revenue to invest in coaching.

It hardly needs saying, that Germany – and Spain, Italy and France, where the number of qualified coaches is also much higher – have consistently outperformed England at World Cups and European Championships. In English football, as in many other industries, excessive wages are draining resources that could be used for genuine investment.



The High Pay Centre is an independent non-party think tank established to monitor pay at the top of the income distribution and set out a road map towards better business and economic success. 
Follow them on Twitter: @HighPayCentre
Like them on Facebook


RELATED STORIES:

Massive CEO pay packages and the high price for failure


RELATED CARTOONS:

SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT:
Saturday, August 25, 2012 Posted by Jake 1 comment Labels: , ,
Our guest post from the High Pay Centre summarises their full report "Football Mad: are we paying more for less?", which is well worth a read too. You can see data that shows how money is being sucked away from grassroots football and into the pockets of players in the top clubs. No wonder our national team hardly ever gets beyond a quarter final, if that!

It's also an example of how one business sector can end up dominated by a small handful  (think Man U, Man C, Arsenal, Chelsea) so powerful that all the others are crowded out. Other clubs can only hope to rise above them by paying their players massive amounts of money.


Much of that money is borrowed. In UEFA’s 2010 benchmarking report, the UK Premier League’s cumulative debt was £3.5bn, 56% of the combined debt owed by the 732 top flight clubs across Europe. Manchester City (a club that currently spends more on players than it earns) won the league on the last game of the season with two goals scored during injury time, scored by players with a combined purchase price greater than the entire turnover for half of the teams they were playing against in the league.



In the last 20 years of English football over half of its professional clubs have been insolvent. When clubs do go into insolvency the rules are that the players’ salaries must be honoured first, after which everyone else gets paid what's left over. So, for example, when Portsmouth entered its first administration in 2010, local business lost £400,000 in unpaid debts. At Darlington in 2009, unsecured creditors like local businesses received 0.0009% of what they were owed, and HMRC (that's you and me!) were owed £404,376 but got just £3.64– not even enough to buy a couple of beers to celebrate. In its 2012 windup CVA, Portsmouth's unsecured creditors were offered 2p in the pound.

There are other sectors that are totally dominated by a small handful of companies. Think banks, energy, telecoms, and rail. As the full report says, when it comes to football the game is really over before its even begun, and regardless of the outcome, we already know who the real winners will be.

Football Mad: are we paying more for less?


Latest report from the High Pay Centre on pay in football published

Optimism is a pre-requisite for supporters of football clubs outside the Premier League’s top three or four. And the opening day of the season affords the opportunity for fans to indulge their dreams of free-flowing football, victories over local rivals and an inexorable march to title-winning glory unfolding over the next 9 months.

But new research from the High Pay Centre shows how dramatic wage escalation in football has made the game less competitive and more expensive to watch, while also channelling the vast sums of money coming into the game from TV money to casinos and Mercedes dealerships, rather than grassroots coaching.
Clubs competing in the Champions League receive in excess of £200 million in revenue, more than double the amount earned by smaller Premier League clubs. Most of this money goes straight into the pocket of expensive new signings, with Manchester City, for example, spending 114% of turnover on players' wages.

The net result is that the supposedly exciting and unpredictable Premier League has become depressingly uncompetitive. In the past three seasons, a club finishing in the bottom three has beaten a side finishing in the top three on just four occasions out of 54. Statistically, last season’s Bolton Wanderers team could have played their Manchester United counterparts 10 times and would not expect to beat them once.

It’s a similar story between the divisions. Prior to the establishment of the Premier League, 50% of TV revenues were distributed across all 92 football league clubs. Today far smaller payments are made at the discretion of the Premier League, with the money again being spent on players' wages instead. Premier League players earnings have risen by 1508% since 1992, compared with 518% in the second tier, 306% in the third and 233% in the fourth (not to mention 186% across the population as a whole).

As a result, only one team, Norwich City, achieved promotion to the top flight in the last five years without either receiving the ‘parachute payments’ available to ex-Premier League clubs or running at a desperately unsustainable wages to turnover ratio of over 100%. Half the professional clubs in England have been insolvent at some point in the last 20 years.

The most depressing thing about all this is that the negative effect of pay escalation on the England football team is not insignificant. The bi-annual navel-gazing over the poor technique of English footballers that greets our early exit from every major tournament can be traced back to our lack of investment in coaching. In England there are 812 registered players to every qualified coach. In Germany, it’s 150, despite the fact that German league rules dictate that clubs must run on a breakeven basis, and their ticket prices are lower, meaning there is less revenue to invest in coaching.

It hardly needs saying, that Germany – and Spain, Italy and France, where the number of qualified coaches is also much higher – have consistently outperformed England at World Cups and European Championships. In English football, as in many other industries, excessive wages are draining resources that could be used for genuine investment.



The High Pay Centre is an independent non-party think tank established to monitor pay at the top of the income distribution and set out a road map towards better business and economic success. 
Follow them on Twitter: @HighPayCentre
Like them on Facebook


RELATED STORIES:

Massive CEO pay packages and the high price for failure


RELATED CARTOONS:

SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT:

Friday, 13 July 2012

Friday, July 13, 2012 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: ,
Chris, Fee and KJ find a silver lining to having G4S involved in the Olympic Games

Friday, 18 May 2012

Friday, May 18, 2012 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , , ,
Why the London 2012 Olympic Games will be just a sideshow this summer

Friday, 10 February 2012

Friday, February 10, 2012 Posted by Jake 4 comments Labels: , , , , ,
Fee gets ready to make her voice heard on the pitch

Friday, 27 January 2012

Friday, January 27, 2012 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , ,
Fee takes a stand against a local gym, after LA Fitness did a u-turn after public pressure

Friday, 3 June 2011

Friday, June 03, 2011 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , ,
KJ sets out his business plan to Fee for his Olympic tickets

Saturday, 19 March 2011

The country and economy are on a knife-edge as George Osborne prepares to deliver his budget. What will its impact be?





Friday, 3 December 2010

Friday, December 03, 2010 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , ,
Why giving your time for free is the perfect CV material

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us