TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Thursday, 31 July 2014

Thursday, July 31, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Regulators want reckless bankers to be criminally liable under new plans
The bosses of leading City firms are to be made more accountable for their actions under proposals that could make them wait up to seven years for their bonuses and potentially be jailed if their banks fail. Responding to recommendations made by the parliamentary commission on banking standards, the two main City regulators on Wednesday set out lengthy consultations aimed at framing a new licencing regime for bankers and the creation of a "potential criminal liability under a new offence relating to a reckless decision causing a financial institution to fail". The Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England's regulation arm, the Prudential Regulation Authority, want the new regime to be in force by January next year and would force bankers to prove they had acted appropriately – a reversal of the burden of proof. Bankers would be subjected to annual checks to ensure they comply with a regime which covers those involved in what is known as a "significant harm function". But the regulators have stepped back from the idea of the parliamentary commission – set up in the wake of the Barclays' fine for rigging Libor two years ago – that bonuses be deferred for as long as 10 years. "The PRA and FCA note that increasing the overall length of deferral is not the only way in which the typical present pattern of deferrals might be altered to improve risk alignment. There is scope to increase the proportion of awards that are held for longer within the overall deferral period, either by requiring a greater proportion of awards to be deferred, or by delaying the start of vesting, which typically starts a year following the initial award," the regulators said. Instead, for the most senior bankers, bonuses must be deferred for seven years and for less senior staff for five years, according to the consultation. And the new rules coming into force will allow bonuses to be clawed back for up to 10 years. This would force bankers to repay bonuses already received as well as having deferred bonuses withheld. GUARDIAN

Energy firms to 'double' profit margins, predicts Ofgem
A year ago, Ofgem estimated that suppliers would make an average profit of £53 per dual fuel customer, a margin of 4%. But in the year ahead they now expect energy firms to make £106 per customer, increasing their margin to 8%. The industry said the figures do not take tax or interest into account. However Ofgem - which will officially publish the details on Thursday - said it was further evidence that the market was not working as well as it should. It has already referred the industry - and the profits it makes - to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). It has also written to the suppliers to ask why falls in wholesale prices last winter have not resulted in lower bills. BBC NEWS

UBS and Deutsche Bank questioned over 'dark pool' trading
Two more banks – UBS and Deutsche Bank – have been drawn in to the controversy over "dark pools", the private trading systems recently highlighted by bestselling author Michael Lewis in his latest book on Wall Street. Dark pool exchanges are operated by banks and allow dealers to remain anonymous until their trades are executed. Lewis argues they are used by high frequency traders who try to make profits by trading faster than everyone else. Barclays is already defending itself against accusations of fraud by the New York attorney general over the way it advertised its dark pool. GUARDIAN

Nearly 2m working adults still live at home with parents
A leading charity has called on politicians to stop pumping money into loan schemes that ‘inflate’ house prices further and instead take ‘bolder action’ to build more affordable homes for a ‘clipped wing generation’ who cannot fly the nest. The plea comes from Shelter, which pointed to exclusive Census data showing there were 1.97million young adults in England who are still living with their parents despite working - this amounts to a quarter of all those aged between 20 and 34 in employment. And a separate survey of 250 young adults who live with mum and dad found nearly half of them are not moving out because they cannot afford to rent or buy a home, Shelter added. Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, said: 'The “clipped wing generation” are finding themselves with no choice but to remain living with mum and dad well into adulthood, as they struggle to find a home of their own. And those who aren’t lucky enough to have this option instead face a lifetime of unstable, expensive private renting... From helping small local builders find the finance they need, to investing in a new generation of part rent, part buy homes, the solutions to our housing shortage are there for the taking.’ DAILY MAIL


Renting in London 'unaffordable' as average rents soars to £1,412 a month but earnings lag behind
The cost of renting a home in London is now double that in the rest of the UK, pushing the capital ‘beyond the boundary’ of what is affordable as wages struggle to keep up with rent rises. The average monthly rent in London soared by 11.2 per cent to £1,412 in June compared to the same time last year – more than twice the rest of the UK, where, excluding the capital, rents average £694 per month, according to the latest HomeLet Rental index. But people in the capital earn on average just 2.23 times the median annual rent, while, experts say, a tenant’s gross income must be at least two and a half times his or her annual rent for a rental property to be affordable.Average monthly rent in the South East has soared by 4.4 per cent over the past year and now stands at £863, with the South West recording a similar rise of 4.6 per cent to £813 a month. But the average tenant’s gross income in those two regions was respectively 2.93 and 2.55 times the average annual rental value, making it just about affordable to rent. Out of the country's 12 regions, only the North East of England and Scotland witnessed minor falls in rental prices, with year-on-year drops of 2.3 per cent and 3.8 per cent respectively. Scotland had an average monthly rent of £578, while tenants in the North East pay £507 on average, specialist insurer HomeLet's Rental Index showed. The English Housing Survey published last week showed that private renters spend about 30 per cent of their income to pay for accommodation, while home owners are looking at 20 per cent, feeding the vicious circle that makes it harder to save for a deposit to buy a house. In 2009, 31 per cent of all households aged between 25 and 34 rented privately – but by 2013 this had increased to 45 per cent, according to the survey. DAILY MAIL

New Centrica boss to get less than predecessor, but up to £3.7m in pay and shares
British Gas owner Centrica is to hand its new boss, Iain Conn, a pay-and-shares package of up to £3.7m this year, less than his predecessor's remuneration, in an effort to avoid a new political row in the energy sector. Sam Laidlaw, who leaves at the end of the year after leading Centrica since 2006, received £1.4m last year. However, he was in line for an annual package of up to £7m had he stayed in the job and was paid £5.7m in 2012. Centrica caused a public outcry in April when it handed Laidlaw shares worth up to £2m. Just days earlier he had handed his £851,000 cash bonus to charity. Centrica has come under fire from politicians on both sides as the average annual household energy bill has soared from £819 to £1,353 in the past five years. The big six energy companies are now the subject of the widest investigation into the sector to date, by the new watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority. It has already identified opaque pricing and lack of competition as the main negative factors. Consumer groups accuse the suppliers of profiteering, which Laidlaw has always vigorously denied. The investigation could result in the energy companies being split up. Centrica has come under fire from politicians on both sides as the average annual household energy bill has soared from £819 to £1,353 in the past five years. The big six energy companies are now the subject of the widest investigation into the sector to date, by the new watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority. It has already identified opaque pricing and lack of competition as the main negative factors. Consumer groups accuse the suppliers of profiteering, which Laidlaw has always vigorously denied. The investigation could result in the energy companies being split up. GUARDIAN

Longest UK slump in a century ends
The collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 heralded a savage moment of reckoning for Britain’s economy; the shock that started in the financial sector wiped 7.2 per cent off national output, wrecking the public finances. Of the G7 major economies, only Italy has taken longer than the UK to regain its pre-crisis size and output per head in Britain is still 4 per cent below its pre-crisis level. A muted Mr Osborne admitted there was “still a long way to go”. Output grew 0.8 per cent in the second quarter of this year, in line with expectations, which means the economy is now 0.2 per cent bigger than it was at its previous peak. But Britain’s population has grown in the meantime and Ed Balls, shadow chancellor, said: “With GDP per head not set to recover for three more years and most people still seeing their living standards squeezed this is no time for complacent claims that the economy is fixed.” Growth was so much weaker than expected in the aftermath of the financial crash that Mr Osborne was forced to extend austerity from five years to eight in order to meet his target to close the budget deficit. But fewer people have lost their jobs over the past six years than many economists had feared and this month the employment rate reached a new record high, last seen in 2005 – a source of Tory optimism. FINANCIAL TIMES

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , ,

SOURCE BBC NEWS: Lloyds fined £218m over Libor rate rigging scandal
Lloyds manipulated the London interbank offered rate (Libor) for yen and sterling and tried to rig the rate for yen, sterling and the US dollar. Barclays and the Royal Bank of Scotland have previously paid $453m and $612m in fines related to the Libor scandal. But a "novel" development, setting the bank aside from competitors that have already been fined for Libor-rigging, was its abuse of the government-backed Special Liquidity Scheme. During the financial crisis the Bank of England offered extra cheap loans to banks in trouble for a fee. Lloyds tried to manipulate short term rates, known as repo rates, to reduce those fees thereby abusing a scheme that had been set up to try and help it. Bank of England Governor Mr Carney said: "Such manipulation is highly reprehensible, clearly unlawful and may amount to criminal conduct on the part of the individuals involved." 

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Riposte: What does banking contribute to UK Plc? 7 myths exposed, and why we must rein them in

Wonga caught sending fake bullying legal letters? Banks, energy firms, government and others use them too

Graphs at a glance: The £20bn paid out by the banks for their PPI mis-selling is more than all their taxes paid since 2008

The bailout of our banks continues. Not from the taxpayer, but from your pathetic savings interest rates. See the BofE data

Financial Reporting Council says just 2% of bank and building society audits are up to scratch

If mis-selling is a fraud, why aren’t bank and energy execs jailed? Especially when the law gives clear guidelines for jailing fraudsters

The Interest Rate Swaps that screwed 40,000 small and medium sized businesses: how the regulator allowed the banks to be judge and jury for their own dodgy deals

RBS accused of seizing small business assets and selling them at knock-down prices to an RBS subsidiary

Graphs at a glance: The government wants you to think we made a profit on sale of Lloyds Bank shares. Actually we made a thumping loss!

Graphs at a glance: How re-mortgaging covered up the theft of Britain's growing wealth in the boom, and helped cause the bust

Graphs at a glance: Official stats show Free Schools are no better, but they are cheaper to "build" from ex-office space!


Sunday, 27 July 2014

Sunday, July 27, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,
A survey by the market research organisation Survation looked into why people don't vote:



In answer to another question in the same survey: "If a UK general election was held tomorrow, would you be likely to vote or not?", the survey showed 56% of people who didn't vote in 2010 said they would vote if an election was held tomorrow. A severe case of non-voters remorse.

The main reason for not voting is people "don't believe my vote will make any difference".


Actually their missing votes make a huge difference. Elections are decided by people who don't vote. Election figures show that no party since 2001 won more than a quarter of the electorate's votes. 


Ironically, despite being the voters who decide elections, people who don't vote are never the winners.

Friday, 25 July 2014

Friday, July 25, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,
Fee, KJ and Chris wonder what difference it'll make...


Association for Citizenship Teaching: GCSE Citizenship Studies continues to be used by many schools and centres across the country with just under 54,000 candidates attaining the qualification in 2013. The provisional statistics for the subject published by the Joint Council for Qualifications show that overall candidate numbers for Citizenship Studies have fallen in the short course, but there has been a small increase in numbers for the full course.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Riposte: What does banking contribute to UK Plc? 7 myths exposed, and why we must rein them in

Wonga caught sending fake bullying legal letters? Banks, energy firms, government and others use them too

Graphs at a glance: The £20bn paid out by the banks for their PPI mis-selling is more than all their taxes paid since 2008

The bailout of our banks continues. Not from the taxpayer, but from your pathetic savings interest rates. See the BofE data

Financial Reporting Council says just 2% of bank and building society audits are up to scratch

If mis-selling is a fraud, why aren’t bank and energy execs jailed? Especially when the law gives clear guidelines for jailing fraudsters

The Interest Rate Swaps that screwed 40,000 small and medium sized businesses: how the regulator allowed the banks to be judge and jury for their own dodgy deals

RBS accused of seizing small business assets and selling them at knock-down prices to an RBS subsidiary

Graphs at a glance: The government wants you to think we made a profit on sale of Lloyds Bank shares. Actually we made a thumping loss!

Graphs at a glance: How re-mortgaging covered up the theft of Britain's growing wealth in the boom, and helped cause the bust

Graphs at a glance: Official stats show Free Schools are no better, but they are cheaper to "build" from ex-office space!


Thursday, 24 July 2014

Thursday, July 24, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
U-turn: RBS bosses 'wilfully obtuse' over alleged mistreatment of small firms
Senior directors at RBS have been strongly criticised for giving misleading evidence to MPs investigating claims that the bank mistreated small firms. An earlier report by Lawrence Tomlinson, a Government adviser, alleged that the bank’s Global Restructuring Group (GRG) division was forcing small businesses into administration so that the bank could take their properties and sell them for a profit. Another report by Sir Andrew Large concluded that there were potential conflicts of interest between GRG and its small business clients because the division was an “internal profit centre”. The former Deputy Governor of the Bank of England argued that GRG could be tempted to drive profits from clients rather than help them and turn them around, as the division was designed to do. In reply, giving evidence to MPs, RBS bosses had repeatedly insisted that GRG was not a “profit centre”. However, in a new letter to Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, deputy chief executive Chris Sullivan, who is leaving RBS next year, said he had to “correct the statement he made to the Committee” since he now agreed that GRG was indeed a profit centre. Mr Tyrie concluded: “If this is how RBS deals with a parliamentary Committee, how much can customers and regulators rely on it to be straightforward with them?” TELEGRAPH

Parliament says disabled benefit delays a 'fiasco'
The Public Accounts Committee said the new Personal Independence Payment scheme had been "rushed" through, with a "shocking" impact on claimants. "Many" faced six-month delays, with terminally ill people waiting a month on average for the payment, it said. New claims for the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) - which replaces the Disability Living Allowance (DLA) - began in April 2013. They are worth between £21 and £134 a week. The Department for Work and Pensions began processing new claims for PIP in northern England, but had only made 360 decisions when the scheme was introduced nationwide in June. Reassessment of the existing 1.7 million DLA claimants began in October, but was effectively paused after a backlog of some 780,000 claims built up. Committee chairwoman and Labour MP Margaret Hodge said: "The department's failure to pilot the scheme meant that the most basic assumptions, such as how long assessments would take and how many would require face-to-face consultations, had not been fully tested and proved to be wrong." Ministers defended the system and said the committee’s figures were out of date. BBC NEWS

George Osborne's deficit reduction plan under pressure as borrowing rises
George Osborne is on course to miss his goal of trimming Britain’s deficit this fiscal year after figures showed public borrowing climbed 7.3pc in the first quarter. The Government borrowed £11.4bn in June, just £100m less than the same month last year, and well above analysts’ forecasts of a deficit of £10.7bn. Last month’s borrowing increased the 2014/15 deficit to £36.1bn, up from £33.7bn at the same point a year ago. It also brought total public sector net debt to a record £1.305 trillion in June, equivalent to 77.3pc of GDP (the figures exclude the effects of financial interventions and other one-off factors). The news underlines the magnitude of the task facing Mr Osborne. The Chancellor is aiming to cut the deficit to 5.5pc of GDP in the 2014/15 fiscal year, from 6.5pc last year, to meet targets set by the Government’s forecaster, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). When the coalition came to power in 2010 Mr Osborne promised to eliminate the annual deficit - which at that point stood at 11pc of GDP - by the 2015 election. This goal has since been pushed back by two years to 2016/17, but even the revised target has been thrown into doubt. TELEGRAPH

Banks face new criminal investigation over foreign exchange market manipulation
The Serious Fraud Office has launched a criminal investigation into whether a number of traders at top banks colluded to artificially fix rates in the £3 trillion-a-day foreign exchange markets. Regulators around the world, including the UK, US, Switzerland and Hong Kong, are already looking into alleged rigging of foreign exchange rates but the SFO’s intervention will mark the first official criminal investigation. London is where around 40pc of foreign exchange trading takes place and traders are alleged to have colluded via online chatrooms with names such as the “Bandits’ Club” and the “Dream Team”. The Bank of England has also been dragged into the affair - it has asked Lord Grabiner QC to look into whether any of its own officials were implicated in forex manipulation between 2005 and 2013. So far more than 25 traders working at a number of the world’s biggest banks have been fired or suspended while regulators around the world continue their investigations. TELEGRAPH

RBS chief says foreign exchange manipulation fines could costs banks more than Libor scandal
RBS paid $612m (£390m) last year to settle allegations that it manipulated Libor rates, one of several banks hit with big fines for rigging financial benchmarks. Regulators are now investigating allegations that traders manipulated key reference rates in the $5 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market. Asked if the foreign exchange (forex, or FX) investigation could be a bigger problem for the industry than Libor, RBS Chief Executive Ross McEwan said: "Unfortunately, it has the hallmarks". U.S. and European regulators have handed down about $6 billion in fines to 10 banks and brokerages, including UBS, Barclays and Deutsche Bank for alleged rigging of Libor and its euro cousin Euribor, and more banks are expected to be hit. But a number of industry analysts have said the combination of fines from investigations into forex manipulation in more than half a dozen jurisdictions worldwide, and the potential for suits by fund managers and other investors, could saddle banks with a bill several times costlier than Libor. REUTERS

Workers to lose out on thousands as bonus payout for delaying state pension is slashed in HALF from 2016
The two-tier system of the basic state pension and the second state pension (S2P) will be replaced by the flat-rate pension from April 6, 2016. But pensions minister Steve Webb confirmed today that when the new state pension is introduced in April 2016, people will only see their pension rise by 5.8 per cent if they defer payments for a year. Currently the increase is 10.4 per cent. It will mean someone getting the new state pension, of an estimated £155-a-week, or £8,060-a-year, would only see their annual payments increase by £467.48 if they defer for a whole year. Under the current system, that increase would be £838.24. The move is expected to save the Government £200million-a-year by 2020, and £300million-a-year by 2030. Pensions expert Tom McPhail, of Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'After yesterday’s strong PR on the new pension freedoms, today the Government is using the last day of term to shovel out the less popular outstanding announcements before heading off on holiday.’ DAILY MAIL

Motorists ripped off by up to 3.5p at the pumps as they fail to benefit in full from oil price drop
AA president Edmund King said that if retailers and oil giants fail to clean up their act they face the risk of action by the European Commission, which is pushing for greater openness in the pricing of fuel and even regulation to make it happen. He said: ‘The European Commission has indicated that it will promote fuel price regulation, having been wowed by Austria’s up to 3.6 per cent cut in petrol prices and up to 2.5 per cent reduction in diesel prices since introducing regulation in 2011.’ The European Commission’s study on the vehicle fuels market published this month highlighted a £10billion per year loss to European consumers because of the way they are treated by the road fuel industry. In the UK, diesel prices alone are up to 3.5p higher than they should be, says the AA. And millions of drivers are victims of a ‘postcode lottery’ with big discrepancies between areas where there are no Asda supermarkets putting pressure on forecourts to keep prices down. DAILY MAIL

Parliament says Student Loan system is almost financially unworkable
In a scathing report, the Commons Business Committee called for an urgent review of the system, amid predictions the government is heading towards a multibillion-pound black hole in the funding of universities. There are growing fears among academics about the student loan system, despite unpopular changes in 2011 that involved tripling tuition fees for students. In its inquiry, the committee found that plans to lift a cap on student numbers, funded by selling the student loan book, may make the funding gap worse. The government's own analysis of the sell-off of the student loan book has found it would raise only £2bn rather than the £12bn originally expected. Vince Cable, the business secretary, has now stalled on the sell-off. Adrian Bailey, chairman of the Commons committee, highlighted a persistent record of inaccurate debt forecasting and a failure to collect student loans effectively that "threatens the continued existence of the current student loans model". Under the current student loan system for students in England, the government loses about 45p on every £1 it loans out – much higher than the 28% originally predicted. GUARDIAN

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,
SOURCE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES: UK Employment Rate Hits Record High but Pay Decline Worsens
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the UK employment rate hit 73.1% in March to May 2014, the highest rate on record. The unemployment rate dropped to 6.5% over the same period, from 6.9% before. But total pay growth, which includes bonuses, slowed sharply to 0.3% - a record low. Regular pay, excluding bonuses, grew by 0.7%. These readings are far below price inflation, which jumped in June to 1.9%, meaning the real-terms decline in wages has accelerated. The economy appears to be strengthening. It is expected to grow by around 3% in 2014, the fastest rate of any developed Western economy. And all major sectors – manufacturing, construction and services – are booming. But some are arguing that the labour market, which has seemed to be robust in the face of the post-financial crisis recession, has made a permanent shift in its make-up. Though the figures show people are employed, many count themselves as underemployed because they cannot find enough work. There has also been a sharp increase in self-employment, which can bring financial precariousness and people tend to earn less and pay less tax. And there has been a proliferation of so-called zero hours contracts, where no work is guaranteed from one week to the next.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Saturday, 19 July 2014

Saturday, July 19, 2014 Posted by Hari 2 comments Labels: , , , , , , , ,
The economic crisis caused by the banking crash of 2008 has been used as a smokescreen for many fundamental changes in Britain.

UK GDP has already recovered to its pre-crisis level. However employment rights, pension rights, legal rights and more have been permanently cut under cover of this temporary crisis.

Among the most basic rights is pay. Since the 2008 crisis pay in both public and private sector has fallen well behind inflation. 
The graph, using Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures, shows that average earnings have grown in cash terms from £134.20 per week in January 2008 to £149.30 per week in January 2014. 

However, although Average Weekly Earnings before 2008 kept up with inflation, since 2008 in terms of buying power (inflation adjusted) average wages have fallen by 9%.

Some people firmly, and some sincerely, believe that the secret to becoming internationally 'competitive' is to push down wages. The Conservatives would legislate to make strikes more difficult to achieve this lowering of wages. They would have employees trust their employers to prevent Britain becoming a 'low pay economy'.

The reality is Britain is already a 'low pay economy' compared to other advanced economies. One in five employees in the UK earn less than two thirds of average pay (the accepted definition of 'low pay') according to a report by the Resolution Foundation.



Eurostat provides figures showing that of the five largest EU nations, the UK's average labour cost is at the bottom together with Spain.


Low pay isn't about starting cheap and working your way up the payscale. Another Resolution Foundation report shows that fewer than 1 in 5 people (18%) of people who were in low pay in 2002 had escaped in 2012. (In the pie chart below, 'Cyclers' are those who moved in and out of low pay, but happened to be in low pay in 2012).




The Conservative Party plans to make strikes more difficult, by setting a ballot threshold that has not been achieved by a single Member of Parliament at the ballot box of a national election, nor any government in recent decades.
 

The TUC General Secretary, Frances O'Grady, commented,

"These proposals are designed to make legal strikes close to impossible, and the Conservatives do not include a single proposal – such as allowing secret online balloting – that would increase participation.
 
You cannot have proper negotiations between employers and unions without some power for the union side. Making strikes near impossible will fundamentally shift the balance of power in British workplaces in favour of the employer – and as union negotiations often set the pace for pay rounds, this will hit non-union workers as much as those in unions.

“The purpose of this is clear. It is to ensure that the fruits of recovery are reserved for the few and kept from the many.”

Free marketeers say wages are set by the free market. They would have us forget that the unions are part of the free market. Disabling the unions is anti-free market. As O'Grady says "the purpose of this is clear. It is to ensure the fruits of recovery are reserved for the few and kept from the many".


When the Tories say "we are on the side of the public" in making strikes virtually impossible, don't you believe them!

Friday, 18 July 2014

Friday, July 18, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , , ,
Chris and his wife figure out who's rescuing who...
SOURCE DAILY MAIL: Young adults hit hardest by financial crisis: Think-tank claims real incomes of those under 30 fell 13% since 2008
Between 2008 and 2013, the real household income of the under 30s fell by 13 per cent while among 31 to 59 year-olds, the fall in household income was just over half that at 7 per cent. The IFS said the employment rate among the under-30s fell by 4 per cent following the financial crisis while remaining unchanged for 31 to 59-year-olds. Moreover, those under-30s that could find work found their average pay fell by 15 per cent compared with just 6 per cent for 31 to 59-year-olds. Just over one quarter of adults under the age of 30 continued to live with their parents, the IFS study found, helping to cushion the impact of the recession on their household incomes. Those living with their parents found their income fell by 8 per cent between 2008 and 2013, compared to those living on their own whose incomes fell in real terms by 17 per cent. In contrast those over the age of 60 saw almost no impact on their pay or employment. The report comes four months after the Chancellor delivered a Budget that was largely seen as being aimed squarely at older voters, with reforms to pension rules among one of George Osborne's big announcements. ‘Young adults have borne the brunt of the recession” said report author Jonathan Cribb, a research economist at the IFS. ‘Pay, employment and incomes have all been hit hardest for those in their 20s. 'A crucial question is whether this difficult start will do lasting damage to their employment and earnings prospects’. 

SOURCE DAILY MAIL: Rents rose FOUR times faster than earnings in the last year as demand continues to surge
The latest figures from the Homelet Rental Index show that UK private home rents have risen 7.5 per cent in the last year, compared to a 1.7 per cent rise in wages. Homelet also found evidence that more affluent tenants are entering the rental market, helping to drive up prices and reducing the options of those on lower incomes. The average rent in the UK now stands at £846-a-month, compared to just £787 a year ago, with the rise inflated by hefty increases in East Anglia and Greater London, where rents were up 10.7 and 9.4 per cent respectively. The Bank of England's intervention into the mortgage market and retirees making use of new pension freedom rules to invest in buy-to-let could mean buying a home will become even harder for renters. 

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Thursday, 17 July 2014

Thursday, July 17, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Young adults hit hardest by financial crisis: Think-tank claims real incomes of those under 30 fell 13% since 2008
Between 2008 and 2013, the real household income of the under 30s fell by 13 per cent while among 31 to 59 year-olds, the fall in household income was just over half that at 7 per cent. The IFS said the employment rate among the under-30s fell by 4 per cent following the financial crisis while remaining unchanged for 31 to 59-year-olds. Moreover, those under-30s that could find work found their average pay fell by 15 per cent compared with just 6 per cent for 31 to 59-year-olds. Just over one quarter of adults under the age of 30 continued to live with their parents, the IFS study found, helping to cushion the impact of the recession on their household incomes. Those living with their parents found their income fell by 8 per cent between 2008 and 2013, compared to those living on their own whose incomes fell in real terms by 17 per cent. In contrast those over the age of 60 saw almost no impact on their pay or employment. The report comes four months after the Chancellor delivered a Budget that was largely seen as being aimed squarely at older voters, with reforms to pension rules among one of George Osborne's big announcements. ‘Young adults have borne the brunt of the recession” said report author Jonathan Cribb, a research economist at the IFS. ‘Pay, employment and incomes have all been hit hardest for those in their 20s. 'A crucial question is whether this difficult start will do lasting damage to their employment and earnings prospects’. DAILY MAIL

FTSE fat cats now earn 180 times the average worker, as their salaries hit £4.7m a year
The gap between bosses and workers has soared over the past 20 years - from just 60 times the average wage in the 1990s. On average the bosses of Britain's 100 biggest companies took home £4.7million last year - up from £4.1million the year before, according to the High Pay Centre. Ordinary workers, meanwhile, earned £26,884. A Business Department spokesman said: 'The Government has introduced comprehensive reforms to give shareholders more powers in order to restore the link between top pay and performance, which in recent years has become excessive and increasingly disconnected.” But the High Pay Centre said shareholders were still signing off soaring executive pay despite being given the power to vote them down at annual meetings. They urged the government to take 'radical action' to close the gap, such as requiring firms to cap executive pay at a fixed multiple of their lowest paid employees. High Pay Centre director Deborah Hargreaves said: 'The Government's tinkering won't bring about a proper change in the UK's pay culture... We need to build an economy where people are paid fair and sensible amounts of money for the work that they do and the incomes of the super-rich aren't racing away from everybody else... A maximum pay ratio would recognise the important principle that all workers should share in a company's success and that gaps between those at the top and low and middle earners cannot just get wider and wider.' DAILY MAIL

Fleecing the elderly: home and car insurance price rises that shame the insurance industry
Over the last year, market rates for home and car insurance have plummeted. In Manchester, average car premiums are down by more than £100 and are heading back to rates last seen five years ago. So it is scandalous how insurers chase new customers with low prices while fleecing their elderly, more loyal ones. But there is now a glimmer of hope. If new proposals come into force, customers receiving their annual renewal on car or home insurance will have to be told what they paid last year. It's extraordinary that until now they have had to dig out old documents to see whether they're being shafted with a rise. Many people don't – allowing the insurers to sneak through rise after rise. In March 2008, we highlighted the case of Robert King who was quoted a home insurance renewal price of £551 by Direct Line. Yet when he went to its website, posing as a new customer, he was quoted £173. He had been a customer for 10 years. Ans an 83-year-old Derbyshire pensioner, living in a modest two-bed bungalow, had his home and contents policy with the same insurer for 58 years. It progressively ramped up his premium to £648 a year – yet if he bought it as a new customer it was just £135. So when you open your renewal letter, look for a premium that is lower than last year. If it's not, it's time to switch. GUARDIAN

Uncovered... great sun cream swindle: Prices inflated then slashed to give illusion of discounts
Supermarkets are putting up the prices of lotions just before offering discounts to make shoppers believe they are getting a better deal, it has been claimed. Shops such as Boots, Sainsburys, Asda, Morrisons and Tesco now face accusations that they are manipulating British families ahead of the summer holidays. An investigation by mySupermarket.co.uk, tracked the prices of major brand and own-brand sun tan lotions over the last year. The price comparsion website found a ‘zig-zag’ pattern, where prices were raised shortly before being slashed to ‘half-price’, to create the impression that consumers were getting a bargain. Boots’ own-brand Soltan kids’ SPF 50+ spray is currently half-price as part of a ‘Get the Most out of Summer’ promotion, reduced from £10.50 to £5.25. But the spray was only £10.50 during term-time between January and March this year, when it was also on buy-one-get-one-free. Ever since it has been sold for £5.25. The Department for Business rules for traders state that ‘the price used as a basis for comparison should have been your most recent price available for 28 consecutive days or more; and the period for which the new (lower) price will be available should not be so long that the comparison becomes misleading.’ DAILY MAIL


FCA proposes payday loans cap of 0.8% per day
The measures announced include: Initial cap of 0.8% a day in interest charges. Someone who takes out a loan of £100 over 30 days, and pays back on time, will therefore pay no more than £24 in interest; Default fees capped at £15. Borrowers who fail to pay back on time can be charged a maximum of £15, plus 0.8% a day in outstanding interest; Total cost cap of 100%. Even if a borrower defaults, he or she will never have to pay back more than twice the amount they borrowed. The FCA estimates that payday lenders will lose £420m a year as a result of the changes, or 42% of their revenue. But it says consumers will save an average of £193 each a year. Since 1 July, payday lenders have already been subject to new rules, including a limit on roll-overs, more affordability checks, and controls on Continuous Payment Authorities (CPAs), which allow lenders to take money from people's bank accounts. Those changes have already led to far fewer loans being made. The payday industry said the changes - due in January 2015 - would mean more people turning to loan sharks. BBC NEWS

Insurance price comparison sites failing, says regulator
Of 14 sites reviewed, many were accused of being "unclear" by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and some were failing regulatory standards. The FCA said comparison sites tend to focus too much on price, without telling consumers about other policy details - such as the excess they might have to pay in the event of a claim. It said that some consumers mistakenly believed that the price comparison website had provided them with quotes on the best policy for their individual needs and had assessed the suitability of the policy for them. In addition, some sites which are owned by an insurance company or an insurance broker, were failing to flag up a potential conflict of interest. This is against FCA regulations. Small print on the Gocompare.com website informs customers that it is 50% owned by Esure, an insurance company. Those who read right to the bottom of another site, Confused.com, will see that it is owned by Admiral Insurance. However, the FCA found no evidence that such firms had profited as a result of their potentially conflicting ownership. BBC NEWS

Citigroup pays $7bn to settle sub-prime mortgage investigation
The agreement comes after months of tense negotiations and comes as Justice Department continues to negotiate a similar settlement with rival Bank of America. Citigroup executives ignored their own warnings and misrepresented the quality of the subpar mortgages they were selling to investors. In an internal email cited by the government one Citigroup trader stated the bank "should start praying" because so many of the investments it had made were about to fail. The trader said he was “amazed” the loans had ever been made. Despite knowledge that many of the loans were failing or likely to, Citigroup packaged up the home loans and sold them to investors. Attorney general Eric Holder said the bank’s conduct had "contributed mightily to the financial crisis that devastated our economy in 2008... As a result of their assurances that toxic financial products were sound, Citigroup was able to expand its market share and increase profits.” GUARDIAN

Watchdogs in Britain accused of failing to shine spotlight on emerging 'dark pools' trading scandal
Giving evidence to the Treasury Select Committee, Bank of England officials including governor Mark Carney were admonished for lagging their counterparts in the US and Europe. In the US, Barclays was last month accused of ‘systemic fraud and deceit’ against its ‘dark pool’ customers by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who launched a lawsuit against the bank. In further evidence that US regulators are turning up the heat, Goldman was also fined £466,000 by the US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority earlier this month for failing to protect clients in its ‘dark pool’. In a salvo against Carney and the Bank’s Prudential Regulation chief Andrew Bailey, committee member George Mudie suggested similar urgency had not been evident among the UK watchdogs, including the Bank of England. So-called dark pools are secretive markets where people buy and sell stocks without disclosing information about the transactions. DAILY MAIL

US drugs giant AbbVie trying to buy UK’s Shire in bid to cut tax bill already operates international network of offshore havens
AbbVie bosses want to slash the firm’s global tax bill by 40 per cent in two years by buying the Irish-based pharmaceuticals firm for £31bn. But almost 40 per cent of AbbVie’s subsidiaries are already based in tax havens such as Bermuda, Jersey or Switzerland. Of the 122 offshoot companies registered to AbbVie 46 are based in tax shelters, according to corporate documents analysed by the Mail. A total of 19 are based in Delaware, the notorious tax haven US state which houses almost a million companies, with as many as 300,000 registered at a single address. DAILY MAIL

Taxpayers 'lost £1bn' on Royal Mail sale, MPs say
The government feared failure and acted on bad advice over the Royal Mail stock market flotation, reports the Business, Innovation and Skills select committee. On flotation, the taxpayer-owned Royal Mail shares were priced at 330p, but jumped as high as 618p per share, and now stand at around 473p. The committee also said it was "disturbed" that the taxpayer may not have benefited from valuable assets included in the privatisation. In particular it highlighted three sites in London which the National Audit Office (NAO) said had a hidden value of up to £830m. The committee also expressed concern about so-called preferred investors who received large blocks of shares, prior to the flotation. Some were also advisers to the government over the share sale. Lazard, UBS and Goldman Sachs all had Royal Mail shares allocated to separate parts of their businesses. Lazard and the banks made millions of pounds on the sale on behalf of clients. The Department for Business said the MPs' report contained "factual errors and misunderstandings". The committee's report is the latest in a series of official criticisms of the sale, including by the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee. The government announced there would be a review, led by former City minister Lord Myners, of how it handles all stock market flotations. BBC NEWS

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Wednesday, July 16, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , , ,
For years one of the favourite excuses for making all us Ripped-off Britons worse off by hiking prices and keeping down wages has been the need to pay for "investment". 

Energy , telecoms and transport companies warn of blackouts and overcrowding unless we swallow price hikes for "investment". 

Employers and governments say wages and pensions can't go up because the  money kept from us is needed for "investment".


A report by the National Audit Office, "Infrastructure Investment: the impact on consumer bills", reveals the extent of the rampant rises:


"Spending [by consumers paying their bills] on energy and water bills rose by 44 per cent and 21 per cent respectively, in the period 2002 to 2011 while median incomes were still the same in 2011 as they were in 2002 (all figures calculated in 2012 prices)"

And yet when the rain pours, the wind puffs, or the wrong type of snow falls everything seems to grind to a halt. Is all the investment we pay for with higher bills and stagnant wages being wasted? Or is it simply not happening at all?

Figures from a European Union report, "In Depth Review for the UK", suggest that the "investment" is actually woefully inadequate. The report shows that the UK has about the worst investment record of all 27 EU nations.



Makes you wonder where all the  money actually does go:
Income data from http://topincomes.g-mond.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/
>>
<<


Tuesday, 15 July 2014

Tuesday, July 15, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,

SOURCE DAILY MAIL: FTSE fat cats now earn 180 times the average worker, as their salaries hit £4.7m a year
The gap between bosses and workers has soared over the past 20 years - from just 60 times the average wage in the 1990s. On average the bosses of Britain's 100 biggest companies took home £4.7million last year - up from £4.1million the year before, according to the High Pay Centre. Ordinary workers, meanwhile, earned £26,884. A Business Department spokesman said: 'The Government has introduced comprehensive reforms to give shareholders more powers in order to restore the link between top pay and performance, which in recent years has become excessive and increasingly disconnected.” But the High Pay Centre said shareholders were still signing off soaring executive pay despite being given the power to vote them down at annual meetings. They urged the government to take 'radical action' to close the gap, such as requiring firms to cap executive pay at a fixed multiple of their lowest paid employees. High Pay Centre director Deborah Hargreaves said: 'The Government's tinkering won't bring about a proper change in the UK's pay culture... We need to build an economy where people are paid fair and sensible amounts of money for the work that they do and the incomes of the super-rich aren't racing away from everybody else... A maximum pay ratio would recognise the important principle that all workers should share in a company's success and that gaps between those at the top and low and middle earners cannot just get wider and wider.'

SOURCE HIGH PAY CENTRE: How to make top pay fairer

The Government should consider requiring companies to cap executive pay at a fixed multiple of their lowest-paid employee, according to a new report published today by the High Pay Centre think-tank. The report notes that since the late 1990s executive pay has grown from 60 times that of the average UK worker to nearly 180 times and that more radical action is needed if the gap between top bosses and everyone else is to return to more proportionate levels. Last year the Coalition Government gave shareholders the power to vote down executive pay policy at company AGMs if they thought the proposed pay package was too large. However, every vote at a FTSE 100 company has seen a majority of shareholders support the company policy on top pay. In 2013, pay received by the average FTSE 100 Chief Executive increased to £4.7 million, up from £4.1 million in 2012. The High Pay Centre argue that the perception of an executive elite reaping all the rewards from economic growth is damaging trust in business, while the threat of widening inequality could also cause political and economic instability. Polling suggests that 78% of the public would support a maximum limit on the amount the highest-paid employee of a company can be paid in relation to the lowest-paid, with just 13% opposed.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us