TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Thursday, 2 May 2013

Thursday, May 02, 2013 Posted by Jake 1 comment Labels:
“Big 4” accountancy firms use knowledge gained from staff seconded to Treasury to help clients avoid taxes
In one example, KPMG advised on the development of "patent box" rules, and then issued marketing brochures titled "Patent box: what's in it for you."  Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers have provided the government with expert accountants – free of charge - to help draw up tax laws. But the firms went on to advise multinationals and individuals on how to exploit loopholes in legislation they helped to write. GUARDIAN
("Yes, free of charge... Well, there is a small charge... Between £35bn and £70bn+ of taxes dodged by our clients!" said our Big 4 insider.)

Warning from headteachers as parents dig deep to fund boom in private tutors
Parents on modest incomes and families from ethnic minorities are behind a massive boom in Britain's multimillion-pound tutoring market. Hundreds of thousands of children – some as young as two – now receive private tuition at a cost of between £7 and £60 an hour. Parents say the extra study gives their children confidence and helps them secure top grades. But headteachers are warning that the tutoring market is beginning to spiral out of control and is "trading on insecurity". GUARDIAN
(…So… degrade a public service - education - and a whole new private sector is born! The system works!!)

More women turn to credit cards and loans to make up for their lack of income
A survey by credit report company Callcredit found that 72% of women have applied for some form of credit in the last 18 months, compared to just 28%. Worryingly, the main reason women did so was to make up for shortfalls in their income. The research also found that women are now far more likely to apply for credit to cover household goods than men, as well as being more likely to resort to the desperate measure of taking out an exorbitant payday loan. European Commission studies found that across the continent women earn on average 16.2% less than men. DAILY MAIL

Iain Duncan Smith urges wealthy elderly to 'hand back' benefits
Wealthy elderly people who do not need benefits to help with fuel bills, TV licences or free travel should give the money to his department, said the work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith. He said he would "encourage" people who do not need such financial support "to hand it back". BBC NEWS
(Meanwhile, extremely wealthy people who do not need 'loopholes' to help with their 'tax', 'moral compass' and 'vast wealth' should give the money to the Conservative Party, if they haven’t done so already...)

Google and its auditor Ernst & Young ordered back to parliament to answer tax questions
Google's European boss told parliament's public accounts committee last November that his sales team was based in tax-sheltered Dublin and that the job of UK staff was simply to market Google. But evidence from Google's own website, interviews with clients and former staff, and staff profiles on the internet, shows that some sales staff are based in London. If so, Google's UK tax bill could increase significantly. Google's own corporate website advertises London-based jobs whose duties include "negotiating deals", closing "strategic and revenue deals" and achieving "quarterly sales quotas". Google responded: "As we have said many times, we comply with all the tax rules in the UK and in every other country in which we operate." Google’s motto is “Don’t do evil”. GUARDIAN
(Google added: "And as we have said many times, we comply with all the rules of evil as found in the Kingdom of Hell, and in every other moral vacuum in which we operate.")

Moody’s S&P settle lawsuits accusing them of hiding risky subprime investments
The lawsuits from King County in Washington state and Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank claimed that the ratings agencies and Morgan Stanley hid the risk of investing in a fund that purchased bonds backed by subprime mortgages. The collapse of such "subprime" funds triggered the global financial crisis. The cases were settled without any admission of liability or wrongdoing, which means that no one will be prosecuted. WASHINGTON POST
(…which is handy, as US jails are already rammed full of low income people who defaulted on their subprime mortgages…)

Estate agents obliged to reveal property problems, rather than keep quiet
The days of estate agents singing a property’s praises without mentioning its drawbacks are over. At least, that’s what the Office of Fair Trading has ruled. In the past, it was up to the buyer to ask the questions. The seller or agent did not have to volunteer every detail about a property — their only obligation was to give truthful answers. Now the onus is on the agent to be frank and disclose any information that could affect a decision — not only to purchase but even view in the first place. Matters that must be disclosed include: nearby motorways, flightpaths, night clubs and schools; crime; failed sales and the causes thereof. Also, photos must accurately reflect the state of the property. DAILY MAIL

Austerity kills, economists warn
Austerity is causing soaring suicide rates, rising HIV infections and even a malaria outbreak. In a new book, The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills, the authors show how different strategies to deal with economic shocks affect health. Examples include Sweden, which used public spending to cope with its recession in the 1990s: the number of suicides fell despite a large rise in unemployment. In Greece, however, HIV infection has risen by over 200% since 2011 as prevention budgets have been cut, and intravenous drug use has grown amid 50% youth unemployment. Greece also experienced its first malaria outbreak in decades after budget cuts to mosquito-spraying, the authors say. GUARDIAN

Commission sales are abolished on some financial policies
The new policy will apply to the sale of investments such as pensions, annuities and unit trusts, but not to some mortgages and insurance policies. Commission-driven sales were at the heart of the huge mis-selling scandals of the past few decades, affecting the sale of endowment policies, personal pensions and most recently payment protection insurance (PPI). Even apart from those scandals, the FSA estimated in 2010 that mis-selling in general was costing consumers about half a billion pounds a year. A recent survey for the FSA found that 17% of adults currently take advice from a professional financial adviser and another 32% would consider doing so. But a third of the respondents thought, wrongly, that the advice was free. BBC NEWS
(…Errr... because a hundred per cent of salespeople told them it was?...)

Tuesday, 30 April 2013

Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , ,
The Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, shows the design to Cameron...


SOURCE INDEPENDENT: Sir Winston Churchill to replace Elizabeth Fry on the five pound note

GUARDIAN: Budget 2013: George Osborne concedes lack of progress in cutting deficit
Chancellor, who halved growth forecast to 0.6%, refuses to agree with OBR that his plan to cut borrowing has 'stalled'



OUR RELATED STORIES:

Saturday, 27 April 2013

Saturday, April 27, 2013 Posted by Jake 3 comments Labels: , , , , , ,
Adam Smith, the patron saint of capitalism, theorised that by everyone behaving selfishly the 'invisible hand' of all the selfishness will distribute the wealth of the nation as if "the earth had been divided into equal portions among all its inhabitants". Smith wrote: 

"The rich only select from the heap what is most precious and agreeable. They consume little more than the poor, and in spite of their natural selfishness and rapacity, though they mean only their own conveniency, though the sole end which they propose from the labours of all the thousands whom they employ, be the gratification of their own vain and insatiable desires, they divide with the poor the produce of all their improvements. They are led by an invisible hand to make nearly the same distribution of the necessaries of life, which would have been made, had the earth been divided into equal portions among all its inhabitants, and thus without intending it, without knowing it, advance the interest of the society"

So why hasn't this beneficial outcome happened in Britain? Perhaps the flaw is it requires everyone to behave selfishly. Not just the wealthy, but also the rest of us. Just as the rich demand the gratification of their insatiable desires, for the 'invisible hand' to succeed ordinary Brits must demand as big a share as they can grab. Is it the fine balance of grasping that is the key? Is it all our fault, that although the wealthy are grabbing we aren't doing our bit?

During this time of 'austerity' appeals are made to the unselfishness of us Britons by political and business leaders claiming "we are all in this together". 

Are we ripped-off Britons too gullible, accepting wage freezes, benefits cuts, withdrawal of decent pensions, curtailment of employment rights? Governments have cleverly targeted minorities for their austere medicines. But as the scythe progressively cuts at one minority after another, we slowly realise that we are all minorities one way or the other: the disabled; the unemployed; the teachers; the public servants; the pensioners; the soldiers; the students; the nurses... 

The reality is those who make the appeals rely on the unselfishness of others as they selfishly feather their own nests. Cuts for all - with the biggest being tax cuts for companies, their top executives, and their owners.

For this post we focus on corporation tax cuts, and refer to some interesting graphs from the 2013 Budget Document:

a) Tax cuts announced in the Budget mean Britain will have the lowest corporation tax in the G7 and the G20. We now match those exemplary friends of business Saudi Arabia and Russia. Turkey, South Korea, Indonesia and China are also between us and the next G7 nation in terms of low corporation tax rates.

b) In terms of 'tax competitiveness', the loser by a long chalk is the USA. On the other hand, the UK in 2012 leaped down to the same depths as those paragons of tax probity Luxembourg and Switzerland.


The KPMG report states:

"This jump in the UK’s tax competitiveness is very encouraging. In KPMG’s view there are a number of factors. It is partly as a result of the reducing corporate tax rate. Respondents said this is the number one factor they look for. But reforms to the way in which foreign profits are taxed are also very important."

So let's take a glance at the way foreign profits are taxed: 
HMRC's own assessment of the changes is 

"The measure will remove some specific opportunities for corporation tax avoidance."


The accountancy firms beg to differ:

Grant Thornton

"Any company with overseas operations may now be able to pay lower rates of tax."

Baker Tilly

"Despite the Government’s best intentions to simplify the UK CFC [Controlled Foreign Companies] regime, there is now a myriad of exemptions from the new CFC rules"

So, how does economic growth compare between the scantily taxed UK and the USA where 'tax competiveness' has been thrown to the dogs? Is the US suffering? Actually we find the US outstripping the European economies. With Britain losing the wooden spoon for wretchedness only to Italy.


http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/RP13-17
Of course, if the grotesque enrichment of the few actually did make us all richer perhaps that would be ok. So has the determined selfishness of the 1% of our fellow Brits made us all wealthier than ordinary citizens of other comparable nations? To know for sure take a look at our average (median) incomes, taken from the OECD's stats. 

OECD Statistics, http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=INEQUALITY#
For all the bluster of our leaders in politics and industry, claiming to have put the 'Great' back into Britain, we are actually poor relative to our peers.

It was Winston Churchill who advised never to waste a good crisis. You would expect Cameron and Osborne to be students of Churchill, so it is no surprise they are using the banking crisis as cover to roll back the share of the nation's wealth going to the 90%. 

We too should not forget Churchill's advice in regard to our youthful prime minister and chancellor:

Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart "

Friday, 26 April 2013

Friday, April 26, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments
"Scam": PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPGM... Fee tries to explain, but KJ and Chris get there in the end...



SOURCE: GUARDIAN
“Big 4” accountancy firms use knowledge gained from staff seconded to Treasury to help clients avoid taxes

In one example, KPMG advised on the development of "patent box" rules, and then issued marketing brochures titled "Patent box: what's in it for you." Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers have provided the government with expert accountants – free of charge - to help draw up tax laws. But the firms went on to advise multinationals and individuals on how to exploit loopholes in legislation they helped to write.



Thursday, 25 April 2013

Thursday, April 25, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:

Famous academic paper used to make the case for austerity cuts contains major errors
Another surprise is that the mistakes, by two eminent Harvard professors, were spotted by a student. He'd spotted a basic error in the spreadsheet. The Harvard professors had accidentally only included 15 of the 20 countries under analysis in their key calculation (of average GDP growth in countries with high public debt). BBC NEWS
(“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?” – JM Keynes c.1940. “I change the facts” – George Osborne c.2013.)

OFT accuses pharma giant GSK of 'pay-for-delay' deals to protect profits
GlaxoSmithKline has been accused of paying three other firms to delay the release of cheaper copies of its anti-depressant drug, Seroxat, in a bid to protect one of its best performing products. The introduction of cheaper “generic” medicines leads to strong competition on price, drives savings for the NHS, benefit patients and, ultimately, taxpayers. GSK said they had only just received the OFT objections and needed “time to carefully review it.”  TELEGRAPH
(“How much time? About the same time it takes to collect our paper trail of bribery, then shred it,” said our pharma insider…)

Big Six energy firms 'hide profits to dodge price controls' and cash in as household bills soar
Energy firms may be hiding their profits from energy regulator Ofgem and understating how much they make from consumers. Their accounting methods could be obscuring how much energy groups earn from UK households, making it harder for Ofgem to regulate pricing. It follows the revelation last week that many of the big six energy firms – RWE npower, ScottishPower, SSE, Eon, Centrica and EDF – pay little or no tax in Britain. DAILY MAIL

Shelter inundated as housing costs and benefit cuts bite
Housing benefit changes and soaring living costs mean growing numbers of tenants are struggling to pay bills. A series of welfare changes took effect this month, including a £26k/year cap on household benefit claims, begun in four London boroughs and to be implemented nationwide from 15 July. Also, the so-called bedroom tax, which will result in social housing tenants losing 14% of their housing benefit if they are deemed to have one spare bedroom, or 25% if they are deemed to have two.  GUARDIAN

Which? warns current energy strategy means households pay more
At present, 82% of people who believed they were on the cheapest energy tariff were paying more than they should. As part of a raft of proposals designed to protect consumers, the commons will this week hear proposals to help customers compare tariffs for energy, water and credit cards. But similar measures already aimed at the energy market were accused of adding to costs for consumers. One problem with energy billing formulae is the less you use, the more you pay per unit. DAILY MAIL
(“The less you use, the more you pay per unit?! A stupid formula for a scarce resource, and one that means poor low-use households subsidise the rich. Who’s keeping an eye on these cowboys?!” said OFGEM, without a hint of irony...)

Final salary pension members '£149,000' better off than those with the new standard schemes
Government figures show that the median worth of a final salary pension is £178,000 compared to just £29,000 for standard schemes. The wealth gap between those with gold-plated final salary pensions and the rest of the population is growing. 48% now have final salary “defined benefit” pensions, while 51% have the lower “defined contribution” pensions. However, the number with DC pensions is expected to rise sharply as more final salary schemes are closed: they will increase from 6.6m today to 16m by 2020. TELEGRAPH
(Forget about the threat to the status quo of UKIP. Wait until someone starts the UK Pensioners Party!)

Savers warned of expansion of £80bn "Funding for Lending"
The scheme promised to boost lending to smaller firms, but its main impact has been to reduce mortgage and savings rates. Critics say it's simply sustaining a property bubble and disincentivising savers: two causes of the credit crunch. Anna Bowes of the website Savingschampion.co.uk said: "Those who have done the right thing and prepared for their future by saving have been hammered and now there is little incentive for future generations to save; what message does this send out and what mess will we have to fix in years to come." TELEGRAPH

Tuesday, 23 April 2013

Tuesday, April 23, 2013 Posted by Jake 2 comments Labels: , , , , , , ,
Osborne and Cameron see the light?...



SOURCE BBC NEWS: Prime Minister defends plans to get trainee nurses to first work as healthcare assistants, washing and feeding patients. The Royal College of Nursing called the idea "stupid".

GUARDIAN: Iain Duncan Smith calls petition for him to live on £53 a week a stunt
Work and pensions secretary insists he has twice lived on breadline after online petition secures nearly 300,000 signatures

Saturday, 20 April 2013

Saturday, April 20, 2013 Posted by Jake 5 comments Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Our leaders tell us we must be more competitive. So we can work ourselves out of the banker induced crisis. They tell us that to earn money to pay off the debts that came from the crisis we must compete with other countries to attract companies to Britain. 

To do this they tell us we must have a more flexible labour market (i.e. easier for companies to fire us), more competitive wage structure (i.e. pay us lower wages), and we must cut corporation tax for the companies (i.e. reduce companies' contribution to the public purse, paying for the NHS, schools, defence, roads and stuff like that).

So we thought we would look to see how uncompetitive we actually are in terms of wages, sackings, and tax at the moment:

a) Compare wages, and we see the UK average wage measured by the EU is well below other major European countries, and below the average of all the EU27 countries.
Statistics from the European Union, Europa.eu (As figures are in Euros, UK average wage rise is impacted by exchange rate of strengthening pound in this period)

b) Compare labour market flexibility measured by employment protection and how easy it is to fire us: We see UK worker protection is the joint second worst in the OECD:


c) Compare corporation tax rates, using this graphic produced by HMRC for the 2013 budget: We see corporation tax in 2015 will be well below that in the G7. Even before this cut, UK corporation tax is the lowest (main rate is 23% in 2013, and 21% in 2014).




The data shows we already have low wages, low employment protection, and low corporation tax. And yet Britain shows scant sign of recovery. Nothing but anaemic growth, with the worst recovery of any recession since 1920:




Fitch, the second agency to strip the UK of its AAA credit rating in April 2013, stated:  "The downgrade of the UK's sovereign ratings primarily reflects a weaker economic and fiscal outlook". If the government's objective is to strengthen our economy, then all the cuts in wages, benefits, pensions, employment rights, and even all the cuts in top rate income tax and corporation tax are not working

Is this failure incompetence? Or is it failure at all? Is it actually sublime competence, and we are simply missing the point?

We wonder whether all this cutting has nothing to do with encouraging more companies to come to Britain to employ us. And has everything to do with using the Banking Crisis as cover to further exclude 90% of Britons from a share of the national wealth. Austerity and competitiveness is being used to justify cuts to those not working - pensioners and the unemployed - and cuts to those who are working - salaries and in-work benefits. Keeping more for the top 1%. This rip-off has been happening to Ripped-Off Britons for decades (through both Labour and Tory led governments):

http://topincomes.g-mond.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/#Database:

And the share of national income being paid to employees, as a percentage of GDP, has been dropping since the 1970's:


In spite of this fall in employees' share of GDP, leaving more with companies as profits, the government plans to virtually freeze the amount paid in corporation tax while increasing the amount paid in income taxes:



The government response to the stripping of our AAA credit rating by Fitch was:
"This is a stark reminder that the UK cannot simply run away from its problems, or refuse to deal with a legacy of debt built up over a decade. Though it is taking time, we are fixing this country's economic problems."
Thus we see George Osborne's logic:
Rating maintained = proof austerity and cuts work = more austerity and cuts.
Rating stripped = proof we need more austerity and cuts = more austerity and cuts.

What Osborne has forgotten, unless concentrating wealth in the hands of the few is his over-riding objective, as he takes from the 90% (wage freezes and benefits cuts) to give to the wealthiest (tax cuts) is most of the spending is done by ordinary people. Companies come to a country not just to employ people to make stuff, but also to sell stuff. According to government statistics, although the poorest 50% have virtually no wealth,  they do 30% of the spending. Although the richest 10% have over 70% of the wealth, they only do 20% of the spending.


As the Governor of the Bank of England in May 2011 told MPs:

"'The price of this financial crisis is being borne by people who absolutely did not cause it "Now is the period when the cost is being paid, I'm surprised that the degree of public anger has not been greater than it has."

Friday, 19 April 2013

Friday, April 19, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , ,
Chris meets an energy fat cat...




SOURCE GUARDIAN Big six energy firms accused of 'cold-blooded profiteering'Official figures showed the big six energy firms had more than doubled their retail (i.e. selling to households and businesses) profit margins over the last 18 months and were now earning an average of £95 profit per household on dual-fuel bills. Ofgem also said average margins in generation (i.e. extracting the oil and gas) across the big six increased from 18.4% in 2010 to 24.4% in 2011. Critics accuse energy firms of acting as a profiteering cartel, forcing poor households to either “heat or eat.”

GUARDIAN MP’s outraged that RWE, npower and others have paid little or no corporation tax despite significant profits rise
A spokesman for the energy sector defended them, saying they had spent tax-deductible billions on investment, and in any event paid proportionately more tax than other sectors compared to its contribution to GDP. But they are accused of hiding profits through the complex relationship between different divisions of the same company. Selling energy to consumers – the retail market – is separate from the business of energy generation, and they also have energy trading arms that buy and sell power daily in the "spot" and futures markets.


OUR RELATED STORIES:

Thursday, 18 April 2013

Thursday, April 18, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:
Welfare cuts to hit the north and regions up to five times as hard as the Conservative heartland southern counties
Blackpool, the hardest-hit town, will see an average loss of £914 a year for every working age adult, or 4.65% of household incomes. It is only 0.86% in Surrey. This will also make a Conservative majority at the next election more unlikely, as those are the areas where the Tories must win more seats. FINANCIAL TIMES

Royal Bank of Scotland should stay in public ownership for now, says poll
A YouGov poll reveals only 9% of voters think RBS should see a swift return to the private sector, while 66% call for bailed out bank bosses to return their knighthoods. The government is understood to be keen to kickstart the selloff of part of its 82% stake in the bailed out RBS before the general election in 2015, even though – on current prices – this would involve a loss of around £20bn. GUARDIAN
(66%? What did the other 34% want done to those bank bosses?..)

Big six energy firms accused of 'cold-blooded profiteering'
Official figures showed the big six energy firms had more than doubled their retail (i.e. selling to households and businesses) profit margins over the last 18 months and were now earning an average of £95 profit per household on dual-fuel bills. Ofgem also said average margins in generation (i.e. extracting the oil and gas) across the big six increased from 18.4% in 2010 to 24.4% in 2011. Critics accuse energy firms of acting as a profiteering cartel, forcing poor households to either “heat or eat.” GUARDIAN
(“Hey, we’re also faced with a choice that rhymes. Compete or cheat...” said our energy fat cat insider.)

MP’s outraged that RWE, npower and others have paid little or no corporation tax despite significant profits rise
A spokesman for the energy sector defended them, saying they had spent tax-deductible billions on investment, and in any event paid proportionately more tax than other sectors compared to its contribution to GDP. But they are accused of hiding profits through the complex relationship between different divisions of the same company. Selling energy to consumers – the retail market – is separate from the business of energy generation, and they also have energy trading arms that buy and sell power daily in the "spot" and futures markets. GUARDIAN

Homebuyers overpaying by tens of thousands of pounds because of widespread “errors” by estate agents in measuring floorspace
The FT analysed more than 200 London properties and found more than half have floorplans much larger in square footage compared with another agent selling the same property. The difference varied by as much as 300 sq ft. Several complaints have been made against Foxtons. It can have a big impact in the prime London market where it has become common practice to value property based on floorspace. Some in the industry blame poorly trained staff, and  rules that allow alcoves and stairwells to be included in the measurement.  FINANCIAL TIMES
(NEWS LATEST: A crisis meeting of the entire membership of the Association of Estate Agents, convened to rebut the FT’s findings, was abandoned when the conference room they hired turned out to be Foxton's broom cupboard…)

Staff fraud increases by 43% in 2012
The main reason for the overall increase is the surge in fraudulent attempts to gain employment, given the economic and employment uncertainty. Another common fraud is the theft of cash from either a customer account, or directly from the employer. Frauds where an organisation’s staff stole customer data for personal use have also increased. CIFAS

OFT opens investigation into 'free apps' that allow children to buy in-game content
‘Direct exhortations’ to children - a strong encouragement to make a purchase - are against the law under the Consumer Protection (from unfair trading) Regulations 2008. In one case five-year-old Danny Kitchen from Bristol racked up a bill of £1,700 on the game Zombies vs Ninja, downloaded from iTunes, in which players can purchase weapon upgrades for as much as £69.99 a time. The money was later refunded by Apple. Twice-capped England rugby union player Sam Vesty told BBC Radio 5 Live that his two sons had spent £3,200 in under three hours on the game Tiny Monsters, after 54 purchases of a “mountain of food” at £69.99 a go. INDEPENDENT
(...and it’s that old 99p trick again. ‘Cos no 5 year old would dream of spending £70 on a mountain of non-existent electronic food…)

Tenants and landlords to be given right to challenge rogue letting agents
The new laws require agents to sign up to ombudsman scheme while giving the OFT the power to ban those who act improperly. The changes have already received widespread support from estate agents, letting agents, the British Property Federation, RICS, Which? and Consumer Focus. Although the new rules provide welcome redress procedures, they don’t go so far as to outlaw the unfair practices in the first place, like hidden agents’ fees. GUARDIAN
(One lettings agent called in to congratulate the new legislation, saying it would separate the rogues from the honest agents. Then sent us a bill for cleaning his carpets…) 

Pauper's funerals soar as government refuses to pay
As the country gears up for a lavish funeral for Margaret Thatcher, the number of pauper's funerals has increased dramatically, as the government refuses half of all requests to fund a proper funeral. AOL MONEY/PA

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , ,
Cameron ponders the implications with IDS, Osborne and his party...



SOURCE FINANCIAL TIMES: Cuts to welfare payments will hit the local economies of northern towns and cities as much as five times as hard as the Conservative heartland southern counties. The FT's research underlines the potential risks to economic regeneration and private sector business prospects in poorer areas where the local population faces the loss of a large slice of purchasing power. Small independent shops already faced tough competition from supermarkets and out of town centres and had gone through a hard time during the recession. Taking more money out of already struggling local economies may well exacerbate the problem.

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us