TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Sunday, 13 July 2014

Sunday, July 13, 2014 Posted by Hari 2 comments Labels: , , , , ,
How many votes should you get to win an election? Whether for Parliament or for industrial action? 

David Cameron proposed that a 'threshold' must be passed in addition to being 'first past the post'. Boris Johnson would like the threshold to be at least 50% of eligible voters (including those that don't vote). Both politicians intend this threshold only for strike ballots. But what if a threshold were applied to MPs?

Figures from the Electoral Commission for the 2010 General Election show what percentage of all voters in each parliamentary constituency voted for the winner. Precisely zero MPs had the support of more than 50% of eligible voters in their own constituency. None had the support of more than 46% of elgible voters.

Consider the three main parties seperately:
Conservatives: Highest 45%; Lowest 21%

Labour: Highest 40%; Lowest 18%

Liberal Democrats: Highest 46%; Lowest 19%
Those who don't vote effectively vote to follow the decision of others, whether electing MPs or deciding on strikes. To ensure higher voter turnouts two things are needed:
1) Introduce compulsory voting.
2) Include "I Abstain" as a choice on the ballot.

However, we wonder whether MPs really want it known that between 54% and 82% of their constituents did not vote for them?
http://bsa-30.natcen.ac.uk/media/37580/bsa30_full_report.pdf

Friday, 11 July 2014

Friday, July 11, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , , , , , ,
Chris, KJ and Fee do the sums...


SOURCE BBC NEWS: Public sector strikes hit schools and services around the UK
Hundreds of thousands of people have taken part in rallies and marches across the UK as part of a day of strike action by public service unions. Teachers, firefighters and council workers joined the strike, which follows disputes with the government over pay, pensions and cuts. Thousands of pupils were affected as some 6,000 schools in England closed, the Department for Education said. The Cabinet Office described the action as "irresponsible". But Trades Union Congress (TUC) general secretary Frances O'Grady said workers had gone on strike "to say enough is enough". The GMB and Unison unions said more than one million people had taken part in the strikes. But Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude said fewer than 500,000 had participated. And a government spokesman said "most" public sector workers had reported for work and "nearly all key public services" were delivered as normal.

SOURCE BBC NEWS: David Cameron promises to tighten strike ballot laws
The PM told MPs the "time had come" to set thresholds in union strike ballots. More than a million public sector workers are set to join Thursday’s strike. They include council staff, teachers, firefighters and civil servants on a range of disputes, including pay, pensions, jobs and spending cuts. Ministers froze public sector pay in 2010, and brought in a pay cap of 1% in 2012 which remains in place. Under the current law, a strike can take place if it is backed by a majority of those balloted. The Prime Minister said: "I think the time has come for looking at setting thresholds in strike ballots... The [NUT] strike ballot took place in 2012, based on a 27% turnout.” But Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the PCS union, accused the prime minister of "complete and utter hypocrisy". "Ever since David Cameron came into government, and before him Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, I offered to sit down with them - all of the time, every time we raised it - and said 'We want to work with you to get higher turnouts in ballots' ...And if we work together and we use online voting, internet voting, supervised voting in the workplace - we know that these turnouts will dramatically increase. They never, ever wanted to discuss it" he said. 

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Graphs at a glance: Government spending on education, health and other services are being cut to pre-1948 levels

Thursday, 10 July 2014

Thursday, July 10, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , ,
How much support should a cause have? From Unions wanting strikes for more pay to governments wanting the power to wield the bountiful ladle of taxing and spending?

Since 1979 no ruling party has ever had the votes of more than 1 in 3 of voters in a British General Election.

Since 2001 no ruling party has ever had the votes of more than 1 in 4 of voters in a British General Election.

http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/uktable.htm

Thursday, July 10, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Rents rose FOUR times faster than earnings in the last year as demand continues to surge
The latest figures from the Homelet Rental Index show that UK private home rents have risen 7.5 per cent in the last year, compared to a 1.7 per cent rise in wages. Homelet also found evidence that more affluent tenants are entering the rental market, helping to drive up prices and reducing the options of those on lower incomes. The average rent in the UK now stands at £846-a-month, compared to just £787 a year ago, with the rise inflated by hefty increases in East Anglia and Greater London, where rents were up 10.7 and 9.4 per cent respectively. The Bank of England's intervention into the mortgage market and retirees making use of new pension freedom rules to invest in buy-to-let could mean buying a home will become even harder for renters. DAILY MAIL

David Cameron promises to tighten strike ballot laws
The PM told MPs the "time had come" to set thresholds in union strike ballots. More than a million public sector workers are set to join Thursday’s strike. They include council staff, teachers, firefighters and civil servants on a range of disputes, including pay, pensions, jobs and spending cuts. Ministers froze public sector pay in 2010, and brought in a pay cap of 1% in 2012 which remains in place. Under the current law, a strike can take place if it is backed by a majority of those balloted. The Prime Minister said: "I think the time has come for looking at setting thresholds in strike ballots... The [NUT] strike ballot took place in 2012, based on a 27% turnout.” But Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the PCS union, accused the prime minister of "complete and utter hypocrisy". "Ever since David Cameron came into government, and before him Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, I offered to sit down with them - all of the time, every time we raised it - and said 'We want to work with you to get higher turnouts in ballots' ...And if we work together and we use online voting, internet voting, supervised voting in the workplace - we know that these turnouts will dramatically increase. They never, ever wanted to discuss it" he said. BBC NEWS

NHS chief announces plan to give patients cash to fund their own care
Billions of pounds of health service and town hall budgets are to be handed over to the most vulnerable patients to purchase health and social care services in the community, in a dramatic change of policy being unveiled by the NHS's new boss. Frail elderly people, disabled children and those with serious mental illness or learning disabilities will from next April be offered individual pots of money to spend as they see fit on health and social care services such as carers, physiotherapists and psychotherapy sessions, in an attempt, in part, to keep them out of hospital. Some patients' budgets will be as little as a few hundred pounds, though most are likely to get more than £1,000, with a small number who have very complex needs receiving much more than that. Stevens said that "north of five million patients" could each have a personal combined health and social care budget by 2018, paid for by "billions" of pounds provided by the NHS and local councils. GUARDIAN

David Beckham among stars and wealthy investors warned of huge tax demands as taxman cracks down on suspected avoidance schemes
Footballers, singers, TV presenters, City bankers and other wealthy investors face handing over hundreds of millions of pounds to Revenue & Customs, despite still being locked in a legal battle over alleged tax-avoidance schemes. Investment company Ingenious Media has warned 1,300 investors past and present, who include David Beckham, Ant and Dec and Gary Lineker - that they will soon be hit with a tax demand even though their cases have yet to be resolved. Many investors put money into schemes that backed the British film industry, as directors of partnerships they were then able to write off losses against other income. The tax demands are said to add up to more than £500million and could total as much as £1billion, with larger investors hit with bills for millions of pounds. The stars invested in schemes offered by Ingenious that HMRC deems allowed them to avoid tax, in one instance by allowing them to take advantage of film tax relief, so that it reduced their own overall tax bills. And under controversial rules implemented by The Treasury earlier this year, investors will have to pay back the tax they are alleged to have avoided - possibly with interest - even before a decision has been made on their case. It is part of a wider crackdown by the Treasury to recoup some £7billion thought to be owed to the Exchequer as a result of avoidance schemes. Some 12,000 people are thought to have bought into movie schemes, or versions of them, that qualified for tax breaks under rules designed to help the UK's film industry, with hit films such as Life of Pi and Avatar benefiting. DAILY MAIL


Outcry at plan to put multimillionaire Tory donor David Ross in charge of Ofsted
David Ross, a co-founder of the Carphone Warehouse high street chain, is believed to be the front runner for the post after the Education Secretary in effect sacked the previous incumbent, Baroness Morgan. But the move will be deeply controversial because, as well as being a Tory donor, Mr Ross is the founder of a chain of 25 academies – for which Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, has responsibility. “What will happen when inspectors are sent into his own schools?” one teachers’ leader asked. Any attempt to appoint Mr Ross would ignite a fierce row within the Coalition as Mr Gove’s deputy, the Liberal Democrat schools minister David Laws, has made it clear he expects the appointment to be non-political. Mr Ross, who has given the Conservative Party around £220,000, belongs to an elite diners’ club whose members get frequent access to David Cameron in exchange for donating more than £50,000 a year. Mr Laws indicated that he believed the decision not to re-appoint Baroness Morgan was a sign that the Ofsted inspectorate, which is officially independent of government control, was being damaged by political interference. INDEPENDENT

Dirty tricks banks use to hide your savings rates: Scale of deception that strips savers of nearly £4billion a year in interest laid bare
An investigation by City regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority, into the UK’s £700 billion savings market found bank behaviour left customers routinely deprived of interest. It has now launched a further probe and has asked savers for evidence about how they are ripped off. Half of easy-access savers are currently in an account which pays — or has paid — a bonus or ‘teaser’ rate. These typically last a year, after which the rate can be reduced to almost nothing. Banks and building societies rely on their customers’ laziness or lack of knowledge to leave them on this low rate. On top of this, £353 billion is in easy-access accounts where the rate can be cut without warning. These savers could be losing out on as much as £3.74 billion a year in interest, compared with what they would make if they moved to the best deal available, paying 1.32 per cent (1.65 per cent). Over the past 24 months there have been more than 2,000 cuts on variable accounts.   And they are coming thick and fast.  Banks and building societies don’t have to write and let you know of any change unless it is ‘material’. That means they only have to do it if the rate falls by more than 0.25 percentage points in one go, or a total drop of 0.5 points or more in smaller cuts over a year.  A number of firms now use conditional rates where the interest  paid will depend on the customer sticking to rules. This can include being restricted to making a certain number of withdrawals or depositing a set amount. Make a mistake and the savings rate usually drops substantially. These and other techniques are likely to come under scrutiny by the FCA. DAILY MAIL

First Wonga, now banks, energy and water firms, and the Student Loan Company are caught sending fake bullying legal letters to collect debts
A major row erupted last week when it was revealed that payday loan giant Wonga had made up the names of two firms to harass people who were behind on loan repayments. It has now emerged that Barclays, Lloyds, Halifax, RBS and HSBC are among firms who have sent customers letters that look like they are from outside firms when they are not. The letters appear to be designed to put pressure on customers by making them believe requests for debt repayments have been passed on to third parties. Energy giant Scottish Power and Anglian Water, which supplies families in the East of England, are also using the letters. The Student Loan Company also uses the same tactic to chase graduates for their student loans, and it can now be revealed that the threatening tactics go well beyond the ‘legal loan sharks’ such as Wonga, with a string of household names using the controversial ploy. Wonga was ordered by the City watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), to pay £2.6million in compensation to the 45,000 people affected. The City of London police are investigating whether Wonga has broken one of several laws, ranging from the Theft Act to the Administration of Justice Act, which covers the harassment of debtors. DAILY MAIL

David Cameron's A&E waiting time claim questioned
David Cameron's claim that A&E waiting times are getting shorter have been questioned by the House of Commons Library. The Prime Minister’s claim that the average waiting time in NHS hospitals has fallen from 77 minutes under Labour to 30 under the Coalition is based on a “simplistic reading” of statistics. The intervention is significant to the Prime Minister because the House of Commons Library, which compiles research for MPs, is widely regarded by both parties as authoritative and non-partisan. It rarely makes comment on the merit of MPs’ claims in the chamber. The Library’s analysis concluded: "The data does not show that the average time in A&E has fallen since 2008. Rather, the typical total time in A&E has risen (for admitted patients, at least), and the typical time to treatment has remained static... It is welcome that the rich data on the amount of time patients spend in A&E is becoming part of the wider political debate on the NHS. But in order for it to be useful and informative, it must be discussed in a way which fully respects the data." TELEGRAPH

Main aim of pension reforms was 'to boost tax receipts' rather than give savers freedom - former government adviser claims
Bringing forward tax revenues is the 'primary driver' behind the Government's plan to give savers unrestricted access to their pension pots, a former senior government actuary Chris Daykin has claimed. He expressed concern that many pensioners will be left worse off by withdrawing their whole pensions when the new freedom rules are introduced from next April. People with defined contribution pensions will be allowed to withdraw as much as they want from their pots, provided they are over 55, and only pay marginal tax on it. But in taking their whole pot many savers would hit the 40 or even 45 per cent tax rates, rather than just paying 20 per cent if they were to take a small income every year. Many pensioners' total income will be under the £10,000 personal allowance that can be earned before any tax is paid. Mr Daykin explained: 'The assumption must be that many retirees, given the chance, will take their money out as quickly as possible...so, presumably, the Treasury are assuming cash is taken quickly, if not immediately, and that it is mostly going to be taxed at standard rates.' The Treasury data shows the change would 'front-load' the Government's tax revenues from pension savings, bringing in an extra £1.2billion revenue-a-year by 2018/19. Daykin went on to say: 'There is no doubt a risk that many people may spend their retirement monies too quickly and end up on a very low income.’ DAILY MAIL

Consumers don't trust pension providers, says report
Consumers do not trust the pensions industry and equate investment with casino-style gambling, according to a report from the government's workplace pension scheme. National Employment Savings Trust (Nest) found that consumers wanted their pensions to be safe and reliable but they associated the industry with corruption and incompetence. The financial crisis had made people more wary of investing by increasing fears that their money could be lost. Nest said the findings were a worry given that auto-enrolment into workplace pensions had started and people retiring had been given greater freedom over what they do with their pension pots. GUARDIAN

Network Rail fined more than £50m for late trains
The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has slapped a £53.1m fine on the track operator, the biggest it has yet levied for missing targets. Last year, almost one in six long-distance trains ran late, nearly twice as many as permitted by the 92% punctuality target. More than one in 10 commuter trains in London and the south-east ran late, where the target was 93%. The government said some of the fine would go towards improving Wi-Fi, with trackside equipment being put in place by NR over the next three to four years to provide a faster service. The service, costing around £90m, is expected to be free for passengers and should increase broadband speeds by 10 times. Unions have denounced the move. The RMT acting general secretary, Mick Cash, said: "The public need to be aware of the brutal fact that the fine will come straight out of safety-critical maintenance and renewals budgets and diverted into the pockets of the greedy private train companies to finance Wi-Fi services on their trains." Manuel Cortes, the leader of the TSSA rail union, said it was "yet another example of the crazy-money merry-go-round that is at the heart of our fragmented rail industry". GUARDIAN

Tuesday, 8 July 2014

Tuesday, July 08, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,

SOURCE GUARDIAN: Network Rail fined more than £50m for late trains
The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has slapped a £53.1m fine on the track operator, the biggest it has yet levied for missing targets. Last year, almost one in six long-distance trains ran late, nearly twice as many as permitted by the 92% punctuality target. More than one in 10 commuter trains in London and the south-east ran late, where the target was 93%. The government said some of the fine would go towards improving Wi-Fi, with trackside equipment being put in place by NR over the next three to four years to provide a faster service. The service, costing around £90m, is expected to be free for passengers and should increase broadband speeds by 10 times. Unions have denounced the move. The RMT acting general secretary, Mick Cash, said: "The public need to be aware of the brutal fact that the fine will come straight out of safety-critical maintenance and renewals budgets and diverted into the pockets of the greedy private train companies to finance Wi-Fi services on their trains." Manuel Cortes, the leader of the TSSA rail union, said it was "yet another example of the crazy-money merry-go-round that is at the heart of our fragmented rail industry".

SOURCE BBC NEWS: Network Rail fine to help pay for faster train wi-fi
A proportion of the £90m cost of the scheme will be funded by the government from a record-breaking fine being handed to Network Rail this week. The firm looks after much of the track, signalling and stations across Britain. It is being punished by the Office of Rail Regulation for missing key punctuality targets on its long-distance services over five years. Critics have long questioned the point of fining Network Rail for poor service, because in the end it is being stripped of cash that could be used to improve the lines. Now ministers say they will make sure the cash will be used to help people get online. 

Saturday, 5 July 2014

Saturday, July 05, 2014 Posted by Hari 2 comments Labels: , , , ,
Wonga sent phoney lawyer's letter to 45,000 customers between 2008 to 2010. Shocked? You shouldn't be. 

Not because it's just the sort of thing Wonga would do. But because it's just the sort of thing companies in Britain do to Ripped-Off Britons, as we shall show:

In the very same week of the Wonga phoney-letter judgement several Blue Chip British companies were caught out doing the same. The Daily Mail reported:

"High street banks are using Wonga-style bullying letters to chase customers for payments.

Barclays, Lloyds, Halifax, RBS and HSBC are among firms who have sent customers letters that look like they are from outside firms when they are not.

Energy giant Scottish Power and Anglian Water, which supplies families in the East of England, are also using the letters."


And the Guardian reported a government agency, the Student Loans Company, was upto the same naughtiness:
 
"The Student Loans Company is facing calls to compensate more than 300,000 graduates sent [between 2005 and 2014] misleading "Wonga-style" debt collection letters."


How seriously is this kind of deliberate intimidation by deception taken by the authorities in Britain? As a rule of thumb, the seriousness of a crime is reflected by the size of the penalty. Let's consider Wonga's penalty.

As a result of its threatening bogus letters Wonga was required to cough up £2.6 million by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The FCA claimed that it could not take the matter any further, i.e. larger fine or prosecution, as the investigation had started under its equally inept and now defunct predecessor the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). For some poorly explained reason the FCA judged that this let Wonga off the hook.
Is £2.6 million by itself much of a penalty? Wonga point out with some justification that it isn't fair to use the 5,853% APR of a Wonga loan, because the APR is based on assumptions that don't apply to short term loans.
So, instead of working out how long it would take a Wonga loan to grow to £2.6 million using 5,843% interest, let's take another approach.

Question: How tough is it for Wonga to "generate" £2.6 million?

Consider the following, from the Wonga website's FAQ
  • Wonga's average loan is £180
  • Charges 1% per day (On £180, 1% is £1.80 per day)
  • plus £5.50 fee for each new loan
Say Wonga lent £180 for a 30 day month. At the end of the month Wonga would have:
  • £180 (loan) + £5.50 (fee) + £54 (30 x £1.80 interest)
  • A total of £239.50
Now, if Wonga 'rolls over' this £239.50 into another loan for another 30 days. At the end of this period Wonga would have:
  • £239.50 (loan) + £5.50 (fee) + £71.85 (30 x £2.395 interest)
  • A total of £316.85
How long would it take Wonga to generate £2.6 million by repeating "roll over" of this original £180 into new loans?

Answer: In just under 3 years, Wonga can grow £180 into the £2.6million it needs to pay its penalty.

The FCA's press release even commended Wonga!:

"We are pleased that Wonga has been working with us to put matters right for its customers and to ensure that these historical practices are truly a thing of the past."

"Truly a thing of the past"? Does that include the banks, energy and water companies? And government agencies too? We shall see.

Friday, 4 July 2014

Friday, July 04, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,
Chris and a top Tory try to clear up any misunderstandings...


SOURCE DAILY MAIL: PM's party for donors - with an £11bn guest list: Billionaires, bankers, and lobbyists among attendees at glittering dinner that gave them access to top Tories
A list of billionaires, bankers and lobbyists who received £12,000-a-table access to David Cameron and other senior Cabinet ministers was published for the first time last night. Documents seen by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism showed there were 73 financiers, 47 retail and property tycoons, ten people in oil, gas and mining and 19 attendees working in public affairs and PR. The documents revealed that almost 450 attendees at last summer’s glittering Tory fundraising dinner had a combined wealth of more than £11billion. They sat at tables costing up to £12,000 each alongside Mr Cameron, Home Secretary Theresa May, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond and London Mayor Boris Johnson. It is not known how much was raised from the 2013 event, but Electoral Commission figures show that since the ball, those present have donated £5million to the Conservatives. Of this, £1.1million was registered in the week after the event. Table sales raised at least £250,000, with cheaper tickets going for £400. The guest list for the private event last summer at Old Billingsgate Market in Central London included six billionaires and 15 people with a personal wealth above £100million. The revelation will give further ammunition to Labour, which wants to paint the Conservatives as the party of the rich. The Tory fundraising dinner is an annual event and this year’s will be held next Wednesday at the Hurlingham private members’ club in West London.

FOR A FASCINATING SEATING PLAN OF THE DINNER, VISIT Bureau of Investigative Journalism

Thursday, 3 July 2014

Thursday, July 03, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Nestle agrees to pay living wage to all contractors
Nestle, the world's largest food company, has become the first major manufacturer to say it will pay the living wage to all its staff. The firm already pays the living wage to its 8,000 employees but Nestle says it will now extend this to its 800 contractors by the end of 2017. Nestle UK & Ireland chief executive Fiona Kendrick said: "As a major UK employer, we know that this is the right thing to do. Not only does it benefit our employees but also the communities they live and work in." The living wage is based on the amount an individual needs to earn to cover the basic costs of living. Living costs vary in different parts of the country so there is a different rate for London and the rest of the UK. The living wage is now set at £8.80 an hour in London and £7.65 an hour elsewhere. By comparison, the national minimum wage is significantly lower. Since 1 October, 2013, the national minimum wage has been £6.31 an hour for adults aged 21 and over, and £5.03 for those aged 18 to 21. The GMB union said: "This shows once and for all that if one leading manufacturer can pay a living wage to all employees, including young workers and those contracted out, then many more are able to do so." BBC NEWS

PM's party for donors - with an £11bn guest list: Billionaires, bankers, and lobbyists among attendees at glittering dinner that gave them access to top Tories
A list of billionaires, bankers and lobbyists who received £12,000-a-table access to David Cameron and other senior Cabinet ministers was published for the first time last night. Documents seen by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism showed there were 73 financiers, 47 retail and property tycoons, ten people in oil, gas and mining and 19 attendees working in public affairs and PR. The documents revealed that almost 450 attendees at last summer’s glittering Tory fundraising dinner had a combined wealth of more than £11billion. They sat at tables costing up to £12,000 each alongside Mr Cameron, Home Secretary Theresa May, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond and London Mayor Boris Johnson. It is not known how much was raised from the 2013 event, but Electoral Commission figures show that since the ball, those present have donated £5million to the Conservatives. Of this, £1.1million was registered in the week after the event. Table sales raised at least £250,000, with cheaper tickets going for £400. The guest list for the private event last summer at Old Billingsgate Market in Central London included six billionaires and 15 people with a personal wealth above £100million. The revelation will give further ammunition to Labour, which wants to paint the Conservatives as the party of the rich. The Tory fundraising dinner is an annual event and this year’s will be held next Wednesday at the Hurlingham private members’ club in West London. DAILY MAIL

FOR A FASCINATING SEATING PLAN OF THE DINNER, VISIT Bureauof Investigative Journalism

Former Tory health minister: NHS in danger of collapse within five years
Senior Tories have called on David Cameron to increase NHS spending significantly. Stephen Dorrell, a former Conservative health secretary, claimed that the challenge to make £30bn efficiency savings to redistribute around the NHS had failed. He said he would be ashamed if the NHS budget did not receive a boost in income at a time when the economy was growing. "I am in favour of the government not denying what 5,000 years of history tells us is true, which is that every time a society gets richer it spends a rising share of its income on looking after the sick and the vulnerable," he said. A slew of bad news over the NHS has raised Tory fears that the health service could again prove to be a toxic issue just 10 months before a general election. The NHS says 299,031 patients arrived at A&E departments last week – the highest number on record. A&E waiting time targets were missed for the 49th consecutive week and a record number of beds were filled last month by patients who could not be discharged, often because community or social care services were not in place. This week Labour MP Clive Efford introduced a private member's bill to lay out how it would repeal the coalition government's controversial health and social care act, which ushered in greater private sector involvement in the NHS. GUARDIAN

CBI says recovery in jobs market bypassing society's disadvantaged
The young, minority ethnic groups and people without advanced skills are missing out on the recovery of the jobs market, and women are still getting a raw deal on pay, according to a report by the CBI, Britain's leading business group. The CBI says its research into who has lost out most since the downturn in the UK economy indicates that personal background still has too much influence on prospects. The group has called for politicians from all parties to help the most disadvantaged in society. The organisation's research forms part of a "Growth for Everyone" project by the lobby group and coincides with a speech this Thursday to be made by the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, on "inclusive prosperity". Katja Hall, the CBI's deputy director-general, said the research reflected a growing awareness among businesses that the recovery was not improving living standards for many people. GUARDIAN


Spending watchdog criticises ministers over £16bn renewable energy deals handed to big corporates
The National Audit Office warned that the government may have handed benefits to corporate power providers at the expense of consumers by awarding £16.6bn of renewable energy contracts without putting them out to competitive tender. The watchdog also noted that the eight contracts to companies such as SSE, Dong Energy and Drax will provide only 5% of the 20% target, and yet the contracts allow them to reduce these targets in future by 36% without financial penalty. The criticism from the NAO came as statistics released by the Department of Energy and Climate change showed that a fifth of all electricity was generated in Britain by solar, wind and other green technologies in the first three months of the year to 18.1 terawatt hours, enough for 15m homes and up 43% on the same period of 2013. GUARDIAN

Stiffer rules for payday lenders come into effect
Payday lenders will no longer be able to roll over loans more than twice or make continued raids on borrowers' bank accounts to recover their cash. The new rules are designed to deter lenders from offering loans to borrowers who cannot afford to repay them over the original term, and to protect those who struggle with repayments from incurring spiralling costs. Payday lenders, such as Wonga and the Money Shop, offer short-term loans arranged over days or weeks. They argue that annual interest rates in excess of 5,000% are misleading because debts are paid back before that much interest accrues, but charges can quickly add up if debts are rolled over or repayments are missed. Wonga said that 4% of its loans were extended once, 1.4% were extended twice, and only 1.1% had been extended three times, while 93.5% had never been rolled over. Russell Hamblin-Boone, chief executive of the Consumer Finance Association, which represents some of the biggest payday lenders, said members were fully committed to meeting the new rules. But he added: “...if the regulator turns the screw too far and drives reputable lenders out of the market, these borrowers will be forced to look for credit elsewhere and this creates a perfect market for illegal lenders." GUARDIAN

Households face higher bills to cover £250billon cost of upgrading UK's crumbling roads, railways and utilities and poor will be hit hardest
Major energy, water and transport projects have all been planned over the next 15 years, but no regulator or government department has worked out whether households will be able to pay for them, MPs warned. The Treasury is planning to splash out more than £375billion to replace old assets that don’t comply with EU regulation, to support economic growth and prepare for the needs of a growing population. As much as two-thirds of this investment will be taken on by private companies, but paid for by consumers through utility bills and user charges such as rail fares. This is likely to lead to higher household bills, hitting poorest families hardest as they spend a higher proportion of their incomes on bills. Energy bills alone are predicted to be 18 per cent higher in real terms in 2030 than in 2013. Consumer group Which? said that the government has not gone far enough to ensure that costs are being kept down: ‘...the NAO and the PAC, the Government has still not published an affordability assessment of the impact on consumer bills of infrastructure costs or made a convincing case that these are being kept under tight enough control.' DAILY MAIL

British Gas and Sainsbury's Energy embroiled in mis-selling scandal
British Gas, part of energy giant Centrica, has now agreed to pay compensation to customers who were provided with inaccurate information when signing up for tariffs. The majority were signing up to tariffs branded as Sainsbury's Energy but sold by British Gas staff through its partnership deal. The supplier has paid in the region of £500,000 compensation, shared between roughly 4,300 customers who were given incorrect information about their likely savings. The figure is a relatively small sum compared with other mis-selling cases but is symbolic because British Gas had prided itself on being the only one of the major energy companies not to have mis-sold. TELEGRAPH

Tuesday, 1 July 2014

Tuesday, July 01, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: ,

SOURCE GUARDIAN: BNP Paribas regrets misconduct that led to record $8.8bn fine
US prosecutors said the bank had engaged in a "long-term, multi-jurisdictional conspiracy" involving currency trades for clients in Sudan, Iran and Cuba that was known at the highest levels at the company. Jean-Laurent Bonnafe, the bank's chief executive, said the misconduct was "something that goes against the grain of the bank", and insisted that the settlement did not undermine the solidity of its finances. BNP Paribas shares rose 3.4% on Tuesday, after the bank announced it would pay a dividend of €1.50 a share – a surprise for some analysts who had assumed BNP's 2014 dividend would be wiped out by the enormous fine.
SOURCE BBC NEWS: Barclays shares fall 6.5% on new fraud accusation
The New York attorney general has filed a fraud lawsuit against Barclays. The lawsuit alleges the bank falsified documents and misrepresented benefits it was offering to big institutional clients, including pension funds. It relates to the bank's "dark pool" trading operations, which allow clients to trade large blocks of shares while keeping prices private. Barclays has begun an internal probe into the allegations. In an email to staff, Barclays chief executive Antony Jenkins said: "I will not tolerate any circumstances in which our clients are lied to or misled and any instances I discover will be dealt with severely.” Barclays has been the subject of several investigations, fines and settlements in recent years. In May it was fined £26m by UK regulators after one of its traders was discovered attempting to fix the price of gold. In April, Barclays agreed to a $280m (£167m) settlement with the US Federal Housing and Finance Authority (FHFA), which claimed that Barclays misled US mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the housing crisis. In 2012 it was fined £290m by UK regulators for attempting to manipulate an important lending rate, known as Libor.

SOURCE JAPAN TIMES: London has more billionaires than any other city in the world while Britons’ use of food banks rises 163%
The survey of Britain’s superrich compiled annually for the Sunday Times newspaper is likely to prompt debate in a country where many still struggle financially and where food banks are a fact of life despite economic growth recently returning to levels not seen since the 2008 financial crash. London is home to 72 of Britain’s 104 billionaires, well ahead of Moscow in second place with 48 people. New York is in third place with 43. Britain also has more billionaires per head of population than any other country. The Trussell Trust, Britain’s largest food bank network, said the number of people who they had served had risen 163% in the last year to just over 913,000 people. The group labeled the figure “shocking,” particularly as it does not include those helped by other food providers or the large number of people too ashamed to seek help and who cope by eating less food.

SOURCE TELEGRAPH: Living Wage Commission calls for moves to end 'national scandal'
The Archbishop of York John Sentamu said: "Working and still living in poverty is a national scandal. For the first time, the majority of people in poverty in the UK are now in working households.” A year-long study by the Living Wage Commission recommended a series of "low-cost" moves to tackle low pay, by building on the UK's economic recovery. The commission, chaired by Dr Sentamu, said increasing the pay of half a million public sector workers to the Living Wage could be more than met by higher tax revenues and reduced in-work benefits from a similar number of employees in private firms. Also on the Living Wage Commission is Dr Adam Marshall, director of policy and external affairs at the British Chambers of Commerce. He said: "The return to economic growth means that many employers are now looking again at increasing levels of pay for their employees after a tough period for business... Some businesses simply cannot afford to pay a Living Wage just yet - which is why the Commission rejected a compulsory Living Wage. The task now is to support as many employers as possible to make this transition, because paying the Living Wage can benefit employers as well as their staff."

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Saturday, 28 June 2014

Saturday, June 28, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , , , , , ,
In June 2014 Parliament started debating a key change to the nation's pensions, the "Pension Schemes Bill". According to the Department of Works and Pensions' press release, "Public backing means full steam ahead for pension reforms".

As it apparently already has your backing, dear fellow ripped-off Britons, we thought you should know more about what you are so keen on. 

The proposed legislation includes worrying provisions relating to independent trustees, indexation, and more. But for the purpose of this post, we shall focus on the "new" type of pension being introduced.

Britons have been used to three main pension options:
  • Defined Benefit (DB): Where you are certain how much pension you will get, usually based as a percentage of your salary (final salary; career average; or whatever).
  • Defined Contribution (DC): Where you only know how much pension you will get when you buy an annuity when you retire.
  • No Private Pension: Where your employer makes no contribution, and you depend on the state pension plus welfare and any other savings and investments you yourself may have.
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-332157
If you have a Defined Benefit pension the responsibility is on your employer to ensure there is enough money available in the pension fund to guarantee you will get the agreed percentage of your salary during retirement. This is risky for the employer, as the commitment is made when you start your job and only ends when you and your spouse drop dead. In contrast, with Defined Contribution the employer joins you in contributing to your pension pot. However when you retire it's up to you to use the pension pot, while the employer walks away unencumbered.

It is said the Defined Benefit puts the risk on the employer, while Defined Contribution puts the risk on the employee. The new "Pensions Schemes Bill" comes up with a new "Shared Risk" pension.

Now if you thought "Shared Risk" meant the employer and the employee sharing the risk, you'd be wrong. From the employer's point of view "Shared Risk" is the same as "Defined Contribution". Great for the employer, as it makes its cheaper contributions on a "pay and forget" basis just like for Defined Contribution.


In reality, the only new thing about this new type of pension is its name. Ministers have experimented with various names hoping to disguise what it actually is: "Defined Ambition"; "Defined Aspiration"; "Shared Risk"; "Collective Defined Contribution". Whatever the name of this particular rose, the key thing is it is cheaper for the employer. The typical employer contribution to Defined Benefit is 15% of your salary, but for Defined Contribution it is less than 8%. And like Defined Contribution, if the pension pot doesn't grow as expected over time then that's not the employer's problem - it's yours.

"Shared Risk" actually means you are sharing the risk with other employees, while the employer itself is off the hook. Not unlike a Group Personal Pension (except unrelated companies can be in the 'group'), which is another type of Defined Contribution pension. This basically means rather than being alone in a boat without a paddle, you are grouped in a canoe without any paddles.

All this is not aimed at helping small employers. Showing sympathy for those who aren't strong enough to take the risk is not a priority. 
The reality is small companies already don't really provide Defined Benefit schemes. ONS figures for 2013 show for companies with up to 99 employees only 5% of staff are on Defined Benefit schemes. (For companies with 1 to 12 staff 90% of employees have no company pension; for companies with 13 to 99 staff 75% have no company pension).

This change is for the benefit of large companies, employing over 1,000 staff. For these companies ONS figures show 45% of staff in 2013 were on Defined Benefit pensions.

(As the graphs show, whatever size company you work for the lower your pay the less your employer cares about your retirement).

This new legislation has played fast and loose with the word "Defined". Nothing is "Defined" in this new type of pension. The legislation is equally cavalier with the word "Promise". In a particularly risible manner Section 5 draws a distinction between a "full pensions promise" and a "pensions promise".
  • Full Pensions Promise:
    "(a) the scheme provides for there to be a promise, at all times before the benefit comes into payment, about the level of the benefit, and
    (b) the level of the benefit is to be determined wholly by reference to that promise in all circumstances."
  • Pensions Promise:
    "there is a “pensions promise” in relation to a retirement benefit if the scheme provides for there to be a promise, at a time before the benefit comes into payment, about the level of the benefit."
What is the distinction? A "Full Pensions Promise" is a commitment made at the start of your employment. On the other hand a "Pensions Promise" can be made any time up to the moment before you retire - no different to buying an annuity with a Defined Contribution pension (which is already a mis-selling scandal in its own right).

Britain is a rich country, getting richer. Britain is also unequal, getting more unequal. The share of GDP going to employees, in forms including salary and pensions, has fallen. This pension change means the employee share will get less.


The DWP claims "Public backing means full steam ahead for pension reforms". Full steam maybe, but Public backing? Really?

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us