TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Friday, 10 October 2014

Friday, October 10, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , ,
KJ, Fee and Chris discover how...

SOURCE HIGH PAY CENTRE: One Law For Them - The runaway growth of executive pay
Leading economist Gavyn Davies has argued that low wage growth accounts for more than two thirds of corporate profits since the 1980s. As a substantial proportion of these profits have been used to pay dividends to shareholders, executives (who are directly paid in restricted shares) have directly increased their pay at the expense of their workers.

SOURCE FINANCIAL TIMES: Gavyn Davies - The real underpinning for equities
In the past, market economies have tended to erode unusually high profit margins through price competition which has restored real wages to their previous trends. That has always been seen as the natural order of things in a capitalist system. But there is no sign of it happening this time. It is important to recognise that similar patterns have been seen not just in the US, but throughout the developed world, starting in the late 1970s. In fact, the gross profit share in the advanced economies has risen by about 10 percentage points of GDP over three decades, and the wage share has fallen by the same amount. The cumulative effect on corporate earnings, and therefore on equity markets, has been enormous. Consider the following. If the 10 percentage points decline in the wage share had not occurred, and everything else had (implausibly) stayed the same, then gross profits in the developed economies would have been about one-third lower than they are today and net profits (after depreciation) would have been about two-thirds lower. This is an enormous upheaval in the distribution of income in the global economy, and it has happened in an almost continuous straight line over the entire period. It seems to have been impervious to every kind of shock, including the decline in inflation, the technology bubble, the arrival of the BRICs, the collapse in the global financial system and two successive Ashes victories for England against Australia.

OUR RELATED STORIES:


Thursday, 9 October 2014

Thursday, October 09, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Dept of Energy & Climate Change fails taxpayer: £16.6bn of Renewable Energy contracts awarded without competition
The government's decision to award billions of pounds of renewable energy contracts without a proper tendering process has left consumers out of pocket, said MPs on the Public Accounts Committee. The five offshore wind and three biomass project contracts were awarded without competition to avoid delays. But  MPs said Decc's own case showed no benefits to awarding contracts early. They added that it was not clear if the early contracts were needed in order to meet 2020 renewable energy targets. The contracts involved a guaranteed "strike price" that the renewable energy producers would receive for the energy that they produced. This strike price was linked to inflation, with consumers picking up the bill if inflation rose when the projects were completed. The MPs criticised the government for failing to challenge developers' claims that the projects would not go ahead without consumers taking on part of the risk. "By awarding contracts worth up to £16.6bn to eight renewable electricity generation projects without price competition, Decc failed to adequately secure best value for customers," said committee chairwoman Margaret Hodge. "Yet again, the consumer has been left to pick up the bill for poorly conceived and managed contracts." BBC NEWS

Supermarkets charge suppliers £80,000 just to get new products on store shelves, fuelling a third of profits
Supermarkets are making as much as a third of their profits from suppliers by demanding the type of charges that have led to the accounting scandal at Tesco. Tesco has admitted that it has overestimated its half-year profit by up to £250million and the overstatement is said to relate directly to the miscalculation of the commercial charges imposed on suppliers. The scale of such ‘commercial income’ – as it is known in the industry – is not spelt out in the financial results of supermarkets and its crucial importance has only begun to emerge in the wake of the Tesco fiasco. The fees include penalty charges for late or incomplete shipments, bonuses for hitting sales targets, refunds for promotional discounts and one-off payments for a multitude of reasons such as launching new products. The fees are lumped in on top of simple retail profits and they can grow to huge sums when large supermarkets are able to negotiate more lucrative deals with their suppliers. It has also come to light that Tesco was rapped at the end of last year by supermarkets watchdog the Groceries Code Adjudicator for unfairly using its size to demand that suppliers pay extra fees to secure the best positions on its shelves. Adjudicator Christine Tacon warned Tesco last December that it should not have been asking for such payments. The ruling followed a formal complaint from trade body the British Brands Group about the charges. A spokeswoman for the Adjudicator said eight out of ten suppliers complained they had experienced issues that could be in breach of the supermarkets’ code of conduct. Supermarkets could face hefty fines – as well as a huge fall in total profits – if widespread abuse is uncovered. DAILY MAIL

Wonga writes off £220m in debts for 330,000 customers
Wonga was required to write off the debts because the industry regulator, the FCA, found that it had granted the loans without checking people could afford the repayments. The checks were found to be so poor that many borrowers had no chance of ever repaying the loan because of their dire financial circumstances, with many living on unemployment or disability benefits. The company, which charges annualised interest rates of up to 5,853% a year and has been accused by MPs of “legal loan sharking”, said it would entirely wipe out loans to 330,000 people, and scrap interest and charges owed by a further 45,000 customers. Some of the loans are understood to be more than a year old and have ballooned from a few hundred pounds to thousands. Wonga’s new chief executive, Andy Haste - who has been brought in to overhaul the tarnished brand – apologised and said Wonga lacked experienced credit professionals and “lent to people we should not have lent to”, adding: “The checks were not sophisticated enough and not strong enough.” Haste replaced Wonga’s founder Errol Damelin, who quit the firm in June. Damelin described Wonga’s interest rate as a “great deal.” The lender, he claimed, used sophisticated algorithms to ensure it did not lend to people who couldn’t afford to repay. Damelin, who founded Wonga in 2006, had hoped to collect a £100m windfall from floating Wonga on the stock market at a suggested £1bn valuation. Sources at the company said plans for a float have been scrapped. Wonga warned investors, already reeling from a 53% fall in profits announced on Tuesday, that the changes will lead to “a material drop in the number of loans to new and existing customers”. GUARDIAN

British homebuyers at back of queue for local flats marketed in Hong Kong
They are just the type of starter homes many first-time buyers are looking for. Priced from £180,000, Galliard Homes is building studio and one-bed apartments minutes from local shops and only a half-hour tube journey from central London. But if you are British, you may find yourself at the back of the queue: Galliard put the flats on sale to investors in Hong Kong one week before they go on sale in the UK – despite a written promise by the developer to give British buyers at least an equal chance. In December 2013 Galliard, along with other major developers such as Barratt and Taylor Wimpey, signed a pledge that they would give UK purchasers an equal chance to buy, amid widespread concern about the number of developments pre-sold to investors abroad. Four months later Galliard – the second biggest housebuilder in London – stood shoulder-to-shoulder with mayor Boris Johnson, with a separate undertaking. “We commit to market the homes in our developments first or first equal to Londoners. New homes on every development by the undersigned companies will be available for sale to Londoners before, or at the same time, as …to buyers from other countries.” Overseas buying of UK apartments has ignited considerable political controversy at a time when critics say Britain is building fewer than half the number of homes it needs for an expanding population. In prime parts of London, almost eight in 10 newly built apartments are sold to overseas buyers, led by the Chinese, with many subsequently left empty. But the developers argue that foreign buyers have invested £2bn in London alone, helping to fund 14,000 affordable homes, 16,000 jobs and £129m in stamp duty payments. GUARDIAN

LIBOR fines allocated to help support 200,000 emergency services personnel and volunteers
The government is allocating nearly £10m to help support 200,000 emergency services personnel and volunteers, funded through LIBOR fines. This funding will be focused on mental health, physical recuperation and bereavement support. It is the first time that LIBOR funding has gone to support emergency services personnel. Over £8m of the funding will go to English charities, with the remaining £1.6m made available to the Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland governments. The LIBOR fund has been raised through fines imposed on banks for misdemeanours and attempted manipulation of financial markets. This latest allocation builds on £35 million of LIBOR funding already given to military good causes in previous tranches, £60 million to support Armed Forces personnel, their families and veterans and a further £10 million per annum which has been earmarked from 2015 to support the Armed Forces Covenant. HM TREASURY

Motorists: huge fall in the price of oil fails to make it to the pumps
The slump in the price of crude oil – down 17 per cent in the past three months – has shattered recent forecasts that assumed rising turmoil in the Middle East would send oil prices soaring. But despite the worst excesses of Islamic State in Iraq and the conflict in Syria, the chaos has done little to interrupt fuel supplies. Motorists however could be forgiven for wondering whether they are benefiting. The average cost of unleaded petrol has dropped in the past three months, but only by 1.6 per cent from 130.79p to 128.5p. Petrol prices lag behind oil price falls, which is why the sharp drop in oil will not been seen at the pumps until this week, according to Brian Madderson, chairman of the Petrol Retailers Association, who predicted a 2p drop in average prices. But forecourt prices never fall at the same rate as oil because so much of the cost is accounted for by duty, fixed at 57.95p a litre. That figure was frozen by Chancellor George Osborne in 2011, with a pledge to leave it unchanged until May 2015. But with Treasury coffers still stretched, Madderson fears a future government of whatever colour will be tempted to unleash petrol duty rises again next summer. DAILY MAIL

HMRC uses psychologists and behavioural economics to inspire guilt in taxpayers
Following a trial with more than 100,000 people, HMRC said it had "pinpointed the exact words and concepts" which trigger people to pay, leading to an estimated £210m of additional income to the public purse each year. Phrases such as "nine out of ten people in the UK pay their tax on time", or "most people with a debt like yours have now paid it" have been added to the letters. Often, local comparisons were used to encourage people to pay up. Mentioning public services in letters also increased payments, especially for those with large debts. People with debts of £3,000 were found to be 20% more likely to respond to letters which mentioned public services than those which did not. As a result, the wording of thousands of letters from HM Revenue & Customs to tardy taxpayers has been "subtly altered" with the aid of psychologists to inspire guilt. The letters include statements highlighting how the "great majority" of people pay their taxes on time while also setting out the importance of taxes in funding public services. A similar "nudge" method is being used to encourage potential tax evaders to clarify their tax position and pay up any outstanding liabilities. Those who fail to respond will be the subject of a full-scale inquiry. ACCOUNTANCY AGE

Tuesday, 7 October 2014

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , ,
We at Ripped-Off Britons don't think much of politicians generally. But we try to give them the benefit of the doubt if we can.

When David Cameron, in his speech to the Tory Party Conference in October 2014, said we are "a country that is paying down its debts", was he fibbing or (giving benefit of the doubt) did he actually believe it?

The Tories had already made this statement in 2013, and were politely slapped down by Sir Andrew Dilnot pointing out that the national debt, far from being paid down, had continued to rise.
“The latest National Statistics on Public Sector Finances, published on the morning of 22 January 2013, show that public sector net debt (excluding the temporary effects of financial interventions) at the end of the second quarter of 2010 (June) was estimated to be £811.3 billion, representing 55.3 per cent of Gross Domestic Product, rising to £1,111.4 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2012 (December) (70.7 per cent of GDP).”

Cameron, making the same false claim at the 2014 Tory Party Conference, got virtually the same telling off from Sir Andrew with the figures updated to reflect the passage of time since the previous rebuke. Figures showing that the £1,111.4 billion debt of December 2012 had increased to £1,432.3 billion by August 2014.

“The latest National Statistics on Public Sector Finances, published by the Office for National Statistics on 30 September 2014, show that Public Sector Net Debt (excluding public sector banks) as at the end of June 2010 was estimated to be £997.4 billion (equivalent to 64.0 per cent of Gross Domestic Product) and £1,432.3 billion at the end of August 2014 (79.1 per cent of GDP),an estimated increase of £434.9 billion over the period.


In this second letter, Sir Andrew helpfully provides a graph showing by how much the country's debts has increased each year since 2010:

Why do politicians repeat fibs when they know they will be pointed out by independent credible people? Either it is because they think we, the electorate, are too stupid to understand, or it is because they are too stupid to know they are fibbing.

So, what would you prefer?
1) A Prime Minister who has so little respect for the electorate that he comes up with precisely the same fib year after year?
OR
2) A Prime Minister who is so economically illiterate that he actually believes the country is "paying down its debts"?

OR
3) A different Prime Minister? 

Saturday, 4 October 2014

Saturday, October 04, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , ,
According to a report produced by the UK Parliament immediately after the Scottish Independence Referendum of September 2014, the strongest correlation with voting "Yes" to escape the grasp of the United Kingdom was unemployment. The higher the percentage of people claiming out-of-work benefits, the higher the "Yes" vote for independence.

As Bill Clinton realised, when he won the 1992 US Presidential Election, it's "the economy, stupid". Not the national economy, but the personal household economies of millions of families across the UK.

How will this play out in the coming General Election? Having endured five years of "all in it together" austerity, which has proved beyond doubt that we really aren't all in it together, which way next?

The UK has 9 of the 10 poorest regions in Northern Europe, as well as the richest (London).



London and the South East continue to take the lion's share of the UK economy, according to figures from the Office of National Statistics.

The greatest economic benefits of the HS2 high speed rail link will go to London, according to a report by HS2 Ltd (a company wholly owned by the Department of Transport). 

With 47% of those who graduated in the last 5 years, owing thousands in student loans, doing non-graduate jobs (ONS figures):


With continuing programmes of outsourcing pushing wages down, such as the 25% cuts in salary to outsourced London Borough of Barnet staff:


And with government freezing benefits, claiming it is unfair for benefits to rise faster than wages. When benefits for the working poor are needed even more precisely because their stagnant wages are being eroded by inflation:

Politicians say we must all take some pain for the national economy to gain. The reality is it is not everyone who is taking the pain, and it is not everyone who will see the gain.

As Mervyn King said when he was Governor of the Bank of England


"The price of this financial crisis is being borne by people who absolutely did not cause it…..Now is the period when the cost is being paid, I'm surprised that the degree of public anger has not been greater than it has."

Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, in evidence to the UK Parliament’s Treasury Select Committee, March 2011.


Thursday, 2 October 2014

Thursday, October 02, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
“Google Tax”: George Osborne tells tech giants 'We will make you pay your taxes'
In an ardent speech before the Conservative party conference, George Osborne said that some multinational technology firms go to "extraordinary lengths" not to pay tax in the UK. "You are welcome here in Britain with open arms," said the Chancellor to those firms. "While we offer some of the lowest business taxes in the world, we expect those taxes to be paid… If you abuse our tax system, you abuse the trust of the British people," he continued, vowing to stop such abuses. New legislation will prevent global technology firms from doing what is known as a 'double Irish' - in short, using artificial arrangements to divert profits to offshore tax havens that have been earned in the UK. Companies such as Google have faced grillings by politicians on the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee over why they appear to pay low rates of tax in the UK. Google was branded "devious" and accused of operating "smoke and mirrors" when it appeared before the PAC last year, charges which the company denied. TELEGRAPH


Apple may have to repay billions from Irish government tax deal
Apple’s international headquarters are based in Knocknaheeny, a run-down northern suburb of Cork. Two-thirds of Apple’s global profits for 2011 were attributed to companies registered in Cork. Apple says that it pays all taxes due. EU Commission experts say it paid just 3.7% tax on non-US profits of $31bn (£19bn) last year. The European commission has formally opened an investigation into the Irish deal.  The outgoing competition commissioner, Joaquín Almunia, said the commission’s preliminary investigation suggests that deals made between Apple and the Irish government in 1991 and 2007 “constitute state aid” and that “the commission has doubts about the compatibility of such state aid with the internal market [in the EU]”. He said that a deal which replaced them in 2007 also breaks the rules. Apple has also come under fire in the US for its complex tax arrangements, under which a company called Apple Sales International, which until 2012 had no employees and was controlled by a US-based board, is based in Ireland – where in 2011 it paid taxes of $10m on revenues of $22bn from non-US-based Apple activities, a rate equivalent to 0.045%. Senator Carl Levin, who published a damning report on Apple’s tax practices last year, issued a strong statement in support of the investigation. “The facts are abundantly clear: Apple developed its crown jewels – lucrative intellectual property – in the United States, used a tax loophole to shift the profits generated by that valuable property offshore to avoid paying US taxes, then boosted its profits through a sweetheart deal with the Irish government,” said Levin, who chairs the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Over 40 multinationals – including Amazon, Google and software security group McAfee – have operations in and around Cork, bringing 100,000 jobs to the area, according to Conor Healy, chief executive of the Cork chamber of commerce. GUARDIAN


Banks face paying out billions to more than 12million customers after landmark legal battle against Lloyds over 'unfair' £750 fine for customer who was just £2.67 overdrawn
Oliver Foster-Burnell from Taunton, Somerset, went a few pounds over his £500 limit with Lloyds while he was in between jobs in 2008. Within weeks, the 28-year-old received a letter saying for that every day since he had been charged £20 by the bank. The fees spiralled to £750 before Mr Foster-Burnell was able to find a way out of his financial mess. But, after settling his debts, he took his case to county court where a judge ordered the bank to pay back the fees with interest. His victory could pave the way for billions to be returned to customers in similar situations if Mr Foster-Burnell is able to convince a High Court Judge that his case could apply to others. If successful, banks could face returning as much as £30billion to 12.6million customers, according to a study by The Office of Fair Trading. DAILY MAIL


Household energy bills rise 4% while price paid for gas and electricity by Big Six suppliers falls by up to 20%
Consumer organisation Which? executive director, Richard Lloyd, said: 'The Competition and Markets Authority should now investigate how the independent regulator could establish a price people can trust that will spur suppliers to compete and reassure worried consumers that they're not being ripped off.’ MPs also discovered earlier this month that energy customers face a £215 bill for the installation of smart meters that will only save them around 3 per cent on their average annual bill by 2030 – a much smaller saving than had been predicted. Public spending watchdog, the Commons public accounts select committee, estimated the smart meter rollout will cost £10.6billion for the actual meters, with households forking out up to £11 running costs a year, plus the £215 cost of installing the meter. DAILY MAIL


Lloyds sacks eight traders over Libor and other rate rigging scandal, and claws back £3million in bonuses in the process
Lloyds dismissed the traders over attempts to rig the Libor interest rate and another rate used to calculate what the bank paid to use a government scheme designed to help save it from collapse during the depths of the banking crisis. Sources familiar with the situation said that the laws on recouping bonuses made it impossible to claw back payouts, worth millions more, that have already been pocketed. But the sacked bankers could face further financial penalties, bans from working in the City, or even criminal prosecution, amid ongoing probes by the Serious Fraud Office and City regulator the Financial Conduct Authority. Lloyds was initially investigating some 22 staff, four of whom have since returned to work after being exonerated by an internal probe. A further 10 have escaped without any punishment because they left the bank before it could claw back any bonuses or other payouts for misconduct. The bank was slapped with fines adding up to £218million by US and UK regulators earlier this year, after dealers tried to manipulate the Libor inter-bank lending rate and the Sterling repo rate. Chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio sought to draw a line under wrongdoing at Lloyds, in the light of what he called ‘totally unacceptable behaviour’. The FCA is understood to be considering further action against the Lloyds staff, which could include bans from working in the City or fines worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. And the Serious Fraud Office, which has brought criminal charges against 12 people in connection with rigging Libor, is thought to be considering further prosecutions. Banking analysts still expect billions of pounds in new fines, with Barclays, RBS and HSBC expected to join a settlement of up to £1.8billion with six firms accused of foreign exchange manipulation. Analysts at Bank of America said Barclays, RBS and HSBC were facing £14billion in future fines, when including issues such as RBS’ role in the sale of US mortgage-backed securities widely seen as a key trigger for the global financial meltdown of 2008. DAILY MAIL


Wonga profits nosedive by 53% as it counts the cost of fake legal letter scandal - and reveals it will now be 'smaller and less profitable'
Pre-tax profits fell to £39.7million and the company said it expects to be 'smaller and less profitable' in the near term while it cleans up its image and reshapes its business. It said the slide in profits was due in part to a one-off charge in relation to the fake letter scandal earlier this year. Wonga sent thousands of bogus letters from made up law firms 'Chainey, D'Amato & Shannon' and ‘Lowe Legal Recoveries' to mislead customers into believing their outstanding debt had been passed to lawyers, it was revealed in June. It was forced to pay £2.6million in compensation to the customers. The FCA is also bearing down on providers of short-term credit, proposing earlier in the summer a cap on payday lending meaning that from next January, interest and fees must not exceed 0.8% per day of the amount borrowed. It also wants to impose a cap on the overall cost of a payday loan so that it cannot exceed 100 per cent of the original sum borrowed. DAILY MAIL


Consumers face 'lost decade' as spending squeeze bites
Annual wage growth is likely to remain well below the 4.5%-to-5% rises seen before the financial crisis struck in 2008, the EY Item Club survey says. This will slow consumer spending growth over the next two years. Median pay in real-terms is forecast to fall from £18,852 in 2008 to £17,827 by 2017, the survey suggests. The Item club, a non-governmental forecaster that uses HM Treasury's model of the UK economy, believes that record numbers of people in work - currently 30.6 million - will act as a brake on wage rises. The report expects the pace of consumer spending growth to be 2% over the next two years, compared to the annual average growth rate of 3.7% during the pre-crisis decade. "Total household incomes have strengthened because more people are in work, but individuals do not have extra money in their pockets," said Martin Beck, the EY Item Club's senior economic adviser. "Real wages are being held back by strong growth in the supply of workers and the fact that firms are facing increased non-wage costs, such as new pension schemes," he added. Mr Beck believes the so-called "squeezed middle" - households containing neither highly-skilled nor low paid workers - will continue to see limited growth in disposable income as pay rises remain below the rate of inflation - currently 1.5% - and competition for jobs remains strong. Younger people in particular face the most pressure on spending, the report concludes, as unemployment among people in their 20s and 30s remains above average and the cost of buying a property continues to rise. BBC NEWS


Top fund manager Neil Woodford says his industry overcharges
One of the country's most successful fund managers has criticised his industry for charging customers too much, and paying its managers too much. Neil Woodford says fund managers often claim to be actively managing a fund, when in reality they are following the herd. This means fund managers don't actively choose which stocks to invest in, but instead tend to follow a big index such as the FTSE 100. However, he says that wiser customers and stricter regulation will lead to lower fees in the future. Mr Woodford set up his own fund in May and has £7bn under management. Neil Woodford is considered in the industry as one of the country's best performing fund managers. He puts that down to always taking a long-term view on his investments, arguing that most fund managers take a far too short-term approach. "Fund managers are constrained by the fear that if they were to underperform the index for a three, six or 12 month period, their careers would be in jeopardy," he said. As a result, Mr Woodford argues, they are reluctant to buck the trend or invest in start-ups. BBC NEWS


Banking regulator FCA may fine banks £2bn for currency-rigging
The City regulator has this week held secret talks with some of the world's biggest banks about a settlement for the manipulation of global foreign exchange markets that could cost the lenders a total of around £2bn in fines. The banks, which also include Barclays, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Citi, JP Morgan and UBS, would pay different sums, depending on the gravity of their traders' alleged efforts to artificially move foreign currency rates. However, a person close to the talks said the FCA had informed some of the banks' lawyers that the smallest of the penalties imposed for foreign exchange-rigging were likely easily to outstrip the biggest of the fines it has so far handed out for manipulation of the interbank borrowing rate Libor. Such an outcome would chime with a warning from Martin Wheatley, the FCA chief executive, in February, when he told MPs that allegations about collusion to rig prices in the $5.3tn (£3.25tn) spot market were "every bit as bad as they have been with Libor". The largest fine dished out by the FCA for Libor-rigging to date was £160m paid by UBS in December 2012. SKY NEWS


For every fatal accident, 100 construction workers die from a work-related cancer
During a month long initiative, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) will carry out unannounced visits to sites where refurbishment projects or repair works are underway. From 22 September, HSE Inspectors will ensure high-risk activities particularly those affecting the health of workers, are being properly managed. These include working with harmful dusts such as silica and asbestos, and other hazardous substances. If unacceptable standards are found Inspectors will take immediate enforcement action. HSE is urging industry to ‘think health’ as over 30,000 construction workers are made ill by their work every year. Philip White, HSE Chief Inspector of Construction, said: “Industry has made much progress in reducing the number of people killed and injured in its activities, but for every fatal accident, approximately 100 construction workers die from a work-related cancer. During the recent health initiative, enforcement action was taken on one in six sites.  Time and again we find smaller contractors working on refurbishment and repair work failing to protect their workers through a lack of awareness and poor control of risks. This isn’t acceptable – it costs lives, and we will take strong and robust action where we find poor practice and risky behaviour.” HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE

Tuesday, 30 September 2014

Tuesday, September 30, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , ,


SOURCE GUARDIAN: GP access seven days a week by 2020 ‘guaranteed’ under Tories – Cameron
Access to a GP seven days a week by 2020 would be guaranteed under a Tory government, David Cameron will announce on Tuesday, backing the measure with a £100m fund. Labour has made a separate commitment to guarantee GP access within 48 hours. The prime minister’s announcement is designed to give a clear commitment that all NHS patients would be able to see their GP between 8am and 8pm, seven days a week. The government in April launched a seven-day-a-week-access pilot scheme costing £50m and covering 7.5 million patients in 1,195 practices. An additional £100m wave of access pilots is to be launched in 2015-16, culminating in a nationwide scheme costing £400m over the next five years. The promise, which is due to be announced by David Cameron in a round of broadcast interviews, is the Conservatives’ response to Ed Miliband’s claim that only Labour could save the NHS from privatisation and cuts. Cameron said: “People need to be able to see their GP at a time that suits them and their family. We will also support thousands more GP practices to stay open longer – giving millions of patients better access to their doctor. This is only possible because we have taken difficult decisions to reduce inefficient and ineffective spending elsewhere as part of our long-term economic plan. You cannot fund the NHS if you don’t have a healthy growing economy.”

SOURCE TELEGRAPH: GPs' leader says waiting times are a national disgrace
Increasingly unacceptable waits for an appointment risk illnesses not being detected rapidly enough and chances of treating them quickly being missed, said Dr Maureen Baker, chairman of the Royal College of GPs. She spoke out as NHS figures revealed that one in six patients had to wait at least a week before they see a GP or practice nurse. A total of 58.9 million patients in England will have waited for a consultation for a week or more by the end of 2014, up almost 50 per cent from the 40m who waited that long in 2013. In mid 2011 the proportion of patients waiting at least a week was 13 per cent, rising to 14 per cent by the end of 2013 then reached 15 per cent in mid 2013 and then 16 per cent in July, according to the GP patient surveys. “Even more worrying is that we have no way of finding out how many patients decide not to see treatment because they cannot get an appointment which means we might be missing opportunities of detecting illnesses at an early stage or preventing them happening,” said Dr Baker.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Saturday, 27 September 2014

Saturday, September 27, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , , ,
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) only considers lying an offense if it fools more than half the target market


If OFT rules were applied, all UK elections would be judged completely "fair". 

This is because no political party for decades has won the votes of more than a third of the electorate let alone half. Therefore it cannot be said more than half the target market had been 'fooled'.

Does anyone doubt that politicians lie? Politicians know we know they lie, not least because they themselves work so hard to point out each others' fibs. Labour snitches on the ConDem coalition and the SNP, the Torygraph snitches on Labour. The question isn't why they lie, the question is how they keep a straight face when they are doing it.

After all, they are all honourable (and right honourable) men and women, our MPs in Parliament. We know because they tell us so. So why do they use deceit and dissembling as a key tool in getting their jobs, and getting into power? The answer, of course, is because it works.

Taking a Conservative Party leaflet as an example, our guest author, Barrie Singleton (author of the Spoil Party Games blog), provides an insight below:

What can be done about lying political adverts?

It is illegal under the REPRESENTATION  OF THE PEOPLE ACT 1983 to induce a citizen to vote by threats.


115 Undue influence.

(1)A person shall be guilty of a corrupt practice if he is guilty of undue influence.

(2)A person shall be guilty of undue influence—

(a)if he, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person on his behalf, makes use of or threatens to make use of any force, violence or restraint, or inflicts or threatens to inflict, by himself or by any other person, any temporal or spiritual injury, damage, harm or loss upon or against any person in order to induce or compel that person to vote or refrain from voting, or on account of that person having voted or refrained from voting; or

(b)if, byabduction, duress or any fraudulent device or contrivance, he impedes or prevents [F1, or intends to impede or prevent,] the free exercise of the franchise of an elector or proxy for an elector, or so compels, induces or prevails upon [F2, or intends so to compel, induce or prevail upon,] an elector or proxy for an elector either to vote or to refrain from voting.

And yet much of election literature is about threats and menaces.This Tory pamphlet from the 2010 General Election provides a fine example of all of the above:

 [For a clearer image of the original flyer click on the small image to the right]


We will never know whether the Tory “fliar” made any great difference. What we do know is the Tories’ threats that the alternative to the Tories was Gordon Brown, and “A hung parliament would mean 5 more years of Gordon Brown” all proved to be false. When enough people didn't vote Tory in 2010, the alternative to the Tories turned out to be the Conservative-LibDem coalition.

Of course, political parties are pretty much exempt from regulation when it comes to telling porkie pies. The Advertising Standards Authority makes that very clear:

"For reasons of freedom of speech, we do not have remit over non-broadcast ads where the purpose of the ad is to persuade voters in a local, national or international electoral referendum. Complaints about political advertising should be made directly to the party responsible for that advertising."

Political advertisements are banned from being broadcast on TV under the Communications Act 2003 (instead parties are given airtime via party political broadcasts which aren’t classed as advertising). Meanwhile, political ads in non-broadcast media (posters, newspapers etc) whose principal function is to influence voters in local, regional, national or international elections or referendums are exempt from the Advertising Code. We can’t, therefore, look into complaints that political ads are misleading, harmful or offensive.


The real reason the ASA declines to rule on political fibbing is election campaigns last just a few weeks. By the time a lie is told, a compaint is made, and the ASA gets around to making a judgement the new government will already be in power. Perhaps slipping in with a lubrication of lies. 

The last thing the ASA wants, and knowing the power of lobbyist the last thing we the electorate would want, is an organisation created to keep tabs on phoney cures for baldness bringing down a government.



Thursday, 25 September 2014

Thursday, September 25, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Bank of England deputy asks US to fine banks less
The deputy governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, said: “I am trying to build capital in firms and it’s draining out the other side (in fines and penalties).” Bailey has called for better co-operation with US regulators over the scale of fines being levied on banks to ensure they do not weaken their financial position. Regulators in the US levy largr penalties than their UK counterparts, which on Tuesday fined Barclays £38m for failing to keep its clients’ money separate from the bank’s own assets – a record for that offence. When Barclays was fined £290m for rigging Libor in 2012, just £87.5m was levied by the UK regulator. Since then, HSBC has been fined £1.2bn for breaching money laundering rules in the US while French bank BNP Paribas has been fined £5bn for dealing with countries that were subject to sanctions. GUARDIAN

George Osborne left with little room for pre-election giveaways as government plunges deeper into the red
The Office for National Statistics said the public sector borrowed £11.6billion in August - up 6.1 per cent or £700million compared with the same month last year. It means the government has borrowed £45.4billion in the first five months of the fiscal year - some £2.6billion or 6.2 per cent more than between April and August last year.Analysts warned that the Chancellor will now struggle to hit his target of reducing the annual deficit to £95.5billion this year from around £100billion last year and the record £153billion racked up by Labour in 2009-10.The national debt hit £1.43trillion last month - a staggering £57,000 per household in Britain - despite four years of austerity. The parlous state of the public finances underlines the scale of the task facing whoever is in power after the general election in May. Adam Kirby, director of campaign group Balance the Books, said: ‘Miniscule in the shadow of debt, all our politicians are standing terrified. 'Progress is even slower than the worst pessimists of 2010 might have imagined. And as we approach a new election in 2015 there is little sign of the fundamental reform that’s needed to turn things around permanently - the deficit is still worsening.’ DAILY MAIL

Obama announces US crackdown on corporate inversion tax 'loophole'
“Inversions” involve a US firm merging with a firm in a country with a lower tax rate and have become popular over recent years. But President Barack Obama said new treasury department measures would make inversions less attractive. Those include making it more difficult for an inverted company to access money made outside the US. One way inverted companies do that is by making loans between foreign units and the US business. The benefits of so called hopscotch loans will be removed, according to today's announcement from the US Department of the Treasury. The treasury department is also strengthening the requirement that the US owners of the new inverted firm have to own less than 80% of the new entity. It says that will mean some inversion deals "no longer make economic sense". "We've recently seen a few large corporations announce plans to exploit this loophole, undercutting businesses that act responsibly and leaving the middle class to pay the bill, and I'm glad that [Treasury Secretary Jack Lew] is exploring additional actions to help reverse this trend," the president said in a statement. In a recent inversion deal, Burger King bought Canadian coffee and doughnut chain, Tim Hortons. Under the deal the new group moved its headquarters to Ontario, Canada, where the corporate tax rate is 26.5% - much less than the US rate of 35%. BBC NEWS

New borrowing through personal loans has outstripped repayments every month this year
Such a consistent rise in this type of borrowing has not been seen since 2007, the British Bankers' Association (BBA) said.The monthly data from the BBA shows that there was £175m in net borrowing in personal loans in August and £346m in net borrowing through credit cards. "I was particularly struck that after years of decline, demand for unsecured personal loans is rising quite strongly again," said David Dooks, statistics director at the BBA. "Those products are often used to finance bigger purchases such as cars or major home improvements - the sort of spending we often put off until we feel confident about our financial circumstances… When customers feel more optimistic about the economic outlook they are much more likely to take on new borrowing." However, the reverse is true for overdrafts, with more money (£286m in August ) repaid than taken out. The figures also show that the amount of new mortgage lending was 15% higher than a year earlier in August, with the number of mortgage approvals for house purchases up 5% year-on-year. But the BBA said this activity in the mortgage market was moderating compared with earlier in the year. BBC NEWS

Rents rising faster than inflation
The cost of renting a home in England and Wales rose faster than inflation in the year to August, climbing 2.4%, according to a survey. Rents were up by 1.1% last month compared with July, leaving the average rent at £761 a month, said the survey by LSL Property Services. The figures, based on LSL's own data, suggested seven out of 10 regions had seen rent rises over the year. This was led by a 3.5% increase in the south-west of England. The south-east of England saw rents rise by 3.4% compared with a year ago, and there was a 3.3% rise in the north-west of England, LSL said. Campbell Robb, chief executive of charity Shelter, said: "Successive governments' failure to build enough affordable homes and soaring house prices are leaving more and more families with no choice but to live their lives in expensive and unstable rented homes, never certain of what the future holds." Rents were lower in August compared with a year ago in the North East (down 1.6%), the West Midlands (down 0.4%), and Wales (down 0.1%), LSL said. The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics, published in July, said private rental prices paid by tenants in Britain rose by 1% in the 12 months to June. BBC NEWS

Energy bills are higher on dual-fuel deals
Price-comparison website, Make It Cheaper, compared households in all the different distribution regions used by energy companies. It found that in every case a household would be better off switching to one supplier for their gas and another for their electricity rather than taking both from one supplier. The savings averaged out at £55 a year per household, but in some areas are significantly higher. The cheapest dual-fuel deal for customers in the South Western Electricity Board region, for example, costs £1,053 a year but by switching to two separate suppliers householders in that region would pay £77 less, at £976 a year. The figures are based on the data Ofgem uses for the typical annual electricity and gas consumption of a household at 3,200kWh and 13,500kWh of gas respectively. Historically, householders have been better off opting for a dual-fuel deal, as the discount suppliers have given to customers for buying this way has usually made it cheaper than buying gas and electricity separately. However, the situation changed around five months ago, according to Make It Cheaper, when single-fuel deals became, on average, around 3% cheaper. The saving has increased since then to as much as 7.4% in some cases. This saving won’t be obvious to anyone looking on a price-comparison site, which, unless you specifically ask for the results for one type of energy, will present you with a dual-fuel saving. Instead, you need to click on what are, usually, tabs next to the dual-fuel result labelled “gas only” and “electricity only”. You then need to compare the results from both of these with the dual-fuel saving.The cheapest single and dual-fuel deals in nearly every case we looked at came from newcomers Extra Energy, Daligas and Zog Energy. The latter two entered the UK market last year, while Extra Energy, which currently leads the way on pricing, started in early 2014. Anyone looking to switch to one of these newer suppliers might sacrifice customer service for price, however. GUARDIAN

Google may face $6bn EU anti-trust fine
Google could face a “statement of objections”, the formal path towards a fine that could equate to 10% of the company’s global revenue, or about $6bn (£3.7bn). “Microsoft was investigated [by the EC] for 16 years, which is four times as much as the Google investigation has taken, and there are more problems with Google than there were with Microsoft,” said Joaquín Almunia, the EC’s competition commissioner.Google controls more than 90% of the online search market in Europe, substantially more than in the US where it was cleared by the US federal trade commission (FTC) in January 2013 of favouring its own searches to the detriment of consumers. The FTC said that any such favouring helped users. But companies including European publishers, a telecoms firm, an association of picture industries and photo libraries, and an advertising platform, had complained about Google taking advantage of its dominance to promote YouTube and the Google+ network. GUARDIAN

Watchdog clamps down on anti-competitive comparison websites in bid to cut drivers' premiums, but insurers say measures don't go far enough
The Competition and Markets Authority announced it will ban agreements between price comparison websites and insurers that prevent those insurers from selling their products more cheaply on rival sites.The measures are expected to shave around £20 off the cost of a typical policy.As part of its investigation, the watchdog also recommended the Financial Conduct Authority look at how insurers inform their customers about other products sold as 'add-ons'. It said the limited provision of information over add-on products makes it hard for motorists to compare the costs and benefits, with the sale of no-claims bonus protection 'giving rise to particular concerns'. But while these measures were largely welcomed by the motor insurance industry, many expressed disappointment at the CMA's apparent failure to tackle 'inefficiencies' in the way replacement vehicle costs are handled. Currently, the insurer of the not-at-fault driver sets the cost of a replacement car, which the at-fault driver’s insurer pays.John O’Roarke, managing director of LV= car insurance called the CMA investigation a 'wasted opportunity' to tackle what he called 'systemic problems' in the car insurance industry. He said: 'The current system whereby the insurer of the non-fault vehicle controls the cost that the at-fault insurer pays, is simply not sustainable and drives up the cost of car insurance.' DAILY MAIL

GlaxoSmithKline fined $490m by China for bribery
The record penalty follows allegations the drug giant paid out bribes to doctors and hospitals in order to have their products promoted. The court gave GSK's former head of Chinese operations, Mark Reilly, a suspended three-year prison sentence and he is set to be deported. Other GSK executives have also been given suspended jail sentences. The guilty verdict was delivered after a one-day trial at a court in Changsha, according to the Xinhua news agency. Chinese authorities first announced they were investigating GSK in July last year, in what has become the biggest corruption scandal to hit a foreign firm in years. The company was accused of having made an estimated $150m in illegal profits. GSK said it had "published a statement of apology to the Chinese government and its people". BBC NEWS

Barclays hit by new £38m fine over client assets

Barclays is to be fined £38m for breaching City rules requiring clients’ funds to be kept separate from its own assets, in what is expected to be the largest fine for such an offence. The £38m fine is the second punishment Barclays has received for breaches of client asset rules. The penalty, imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority, will be the latest setback for the bank in its attempt to clean up its reputation in the wake of the 2012 Libor rigging scandal. While this time frame predates the appointment of Antony Jenkins as chief executive, the latest punishment comes as he attempts to defend the bank against fraud charges in the US in relation to the sale of mortgage bonds and after a £26m fine in May for fixing the gold price. GUARDIAN

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us