TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Saturday, 29 March 2014

Saturday, March 29, 2014 Posted by Jake 1 comment Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Winston Churchill said of America:

“You can always rely on America to do the right thing once it has exhausted all the alternatives”


Sadly, the same can’t be said of Britain.



London and New York have fought for the top “Global Financial Centre” spot for years. According to the March 2014 “Global Financial Centres Index” produced by Z/yen, who describe themselves as “the City of London’s leading commercial thinktank”:



“New York is now the leading centre, although its lead over London is statistically insignificant – two points on a scale of 1,000.”


What is it about crusty old London that keeps it head-to-head with glitzy New York? According to a puff-piece by the City of London Corporation the key elements to a Global Financial Centre are:

  • Critical Mass; Connectivity; People; Regulation; Domestic Market Infrastructure; Business Environment


Six solid gold attributes that New York and London can both offer. But London offers something even more valuable! In March 2014 the Financial Times reported that the total fines paid since the Banking Crash by banks to US regulators hit the US$100 billion mark:



"Wall Street banks and their foreign rivals have paid out $100bn in US legal settlements since the financial crisis, according to Financial Times research, with more than half of the penalties extracted in the past year."


Figures show that in 2008 both UK and US regulators were fining banks a similar amount - reflecting the fact that the US regulation was then just as spineless as the UK. But by 2013 UK regulatory fines were only one fiftieth US fines.
Exchange rate US$1.6 = £1
In America, having exhausted all the alternatives perhaps they are trying to do the right thing. The US Declaration of Independence states that power comes out of the consent of the governed: the font of power is the people. In contrast, somewhere deep in the British psyche seems to be the notion that power comes from above "by the grace of God". The notion that the powerful have a divine right to reap the people. 

When they reap excessively UK regulators will only put up a gentle hand and softly "shush" them. We see this gentle approach in OFGEM launching yet another investigation into market abuse by the energy companies. And when the FCA announced a probe into £150 billion of suspicious business by insurance companies, the companies squealed so much that the FCA quickly issued a statement that they were certainly not going to be too strict nor too intrusive:


"We are not planning to individually review 30m policies, nor do we intend to look at removing exit fees from those policies providing they were compliant at the time.  This is not a review of the sales practices for these legacy customers and we are not looking at applying current standards retrospectively – for example on exit charges."
FCA statement on fair treatment of long standing customers in life insurance


Should we pity the poor regulators, who actually know they are little more than fig-leaves? Hector "be very afraid" Sants, formerly chief executive of the FSA, said in a speech in June 2011:

 

"I would like to take the opportunity to make some personal remarks on the challenges the FCA faces.



''The biggest disappointment of my time at the FSA has been the failure of firms, in particular their senior management, to learn the lessons of past mis-selling. Sadly the recent history of the British retail financial services industry is proof of the adage that those who fail to understand the mistakes of the past are condemned to repeat them.''




Hector Sants, CEO of the FSA, 28th June 2011


Chairmen of the FSA lamenting the incorrigibly bad behaviour of the banks and insurers were joined in their frustration by the then Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, who
commented in March 2011





Or should we save our sympathy for the real victims of weak regulation? All the ripped-off Britons?

Friday, 28 March 2014

Friday, March 28, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , ,
Fee, KJ and Chris wonder what will happen next to the "Big 6" energy firms...

SOURCE TELEGRAPH: Energy row erupts as winter deaths spiral 29% to four year high of 31,000
Office of National Statistics figures revealed "excess winter deaths" rose 29% in 2012-2013 to their highest level for four years. Mortality always rises in winter, but one in five of these deaths are because people cannot afford to heat their homes. Campaigners said Ministers talking about cutting green levies should be "ashamed" at the figure, which is worse than Sweden and Finland. 


SOURCE DAILY MAIL: Big Six energy firms face full-scale probe as watchdog finds profits QUADRUPLED to more than £1billion in three years
The Big Six energy companies face a full-scale competition investigation amid widespread public distrust of the industry, soaring profits and evidence of possible ‘tacit’ coordination. Months of building distrust and debate around the energy market came to a head this morning as the regulator Ofgem announced the market will face a full investigation. The investigation would be the first full-scale competition probe into the energy market and would see the UK’s biggest suppliers come under an unprecedented level of scrutiny, with the threat of being broken up. Despite the rising profits, the damning report from the regulator said there was ‘no clear evidence of suppliers becoming more efficient in reducing their own costs’ and that further evidence would be required ‘to determine whether firms have had the opportunity to earn excess profits’.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Graphs at a glance: Wholesale energy price data from OFGEM and NPower show the key excuse for energy price hikes has been a fib

Graphs at a glance: Energy companies' price hike tactics make switching futile

Mortality always rises in winter. But 1 in 5 of these 30,000 deaths are because people can't afford to heat their homes

Graphs at a glance: study shows fewer than 1 in 10 members of the public trust or regard as ethical banks and energy companies

Thursday, 27 March 2014

Thursday, March 27, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:
Defaults mean student fees hike likely to cost more than the system it replaced
New official forecasts suggest the write-off costs have reached 45% of the £10bn in student loans made each year. The 48.6% mark is the threshold at which experts calculate that the government will lose more money than it would have saved by keeping the old £3,000 tuition fee system. The coalition's decision to introduce higher fees of £9,000 shortly after it formed led to rioting on the streets and forced a dramatic decline in the Liberal Democrats' poll ratings, from which the party has never fully recovered. Lower pay for young adults, an over-supply of those with degrees and the worsening economic outlook have all contributed to the revised civil service forecasts which conclude that far fewer graduates will earn enough to pay back their loans over their working lives. Four months ago Willetts notified parliament that the rate had risen to 40% from 35%. In 2010 the estimate was 28%. GUARDIAN

Big Six energy firms face full-scale probe as watchdog finds profits QUADRUPLED to more than £1billion in three years
The Big Six energy companies face a full-scale competition investigation amid widespread public distrust of the industry, soaring profits and evidence of possible ‘tacit’ coordination. Months of building distrust and debate around the energy market came to a head this morning as the regulator Ofgem announced the market will face a full investigation. The investigation would be the first full-scale competition probe into the energy market and would see the UK’s biggest suppliers come under an unprecedented level of scrutiny, with the threat of being broken up. Despite the rising profits, the damning report from the regulator said there was ‘no clear evidence of suppliers becoming more efficient in reducing their own costs’ and that further evidence would be required ‘to determine whether firms have had the opportunity to earn excess profits’. DAILY MAIL

Tory, LibDem and Labour MPs approve annual welfare cap in Commons vote
Welfare spending, excluding the state pension and Jobseekers allowance, will be capped next year at £119.5bn. The idea, put forward by Chancellor George Osborne in last week's Budget, would in future see limits set at the beginning of each Parliament. With Labour supporting the idea, the measure was approved in the House of Commons by 520 to 22 votes. However, eleven Labour backbenchers defied their leadership by voting against the plan. Diane Abbott, one of the Labour rebels, said the cap was a blunt mechanism that would not take into account changes in people's circumstances and economic factors such as rising rents. BBC NEWS

Cameron: You may have to pay for your own social care if you cash in your pension early
Prime Minister David Cameron has warned those who choose to cash in their pension early under Government reforms that they could end up paying more for their care later in life. It comes after George Osborne announced in the latest Budget that savers would be allowed to withdraw money from their pension pots as they wish when they retire. Osborne said his shake up of the pension annuity market was to end the stranglehold the insurance industry has on people’s pension savings. But anyone who has assets worth more than £118,000, including their own homes, will have to pay for their own social care. Cashing in your pension may push you above that limit. DAILY MAIL

SSE pledges to hold gas and electricity prices until 2016
The company's price promise – which will last for at least 21 months – echoes Ed Miliband's call for a moratorium on energy price rises, which when made last September sparked outrage among industry and business leaders. The pledge also came just ahead of the announcement of a full-scale competition investigation of the energy industry by the new Competition and Markets Authority. The regulator Ofgem is calling in the CMA on Thursday, which would subject the big players to unprecedented scrutiny and could prompt calls for them to be broken up. GUARDIAN

Lloyds accused of short-changing PPI claimants
Lloyds Banking Group has been cutting the compensation it pays to payment protection insurance (PPI) claimants, saving itself more than £60m a BBC investigation has revealed. Lloyds cites a little-known regulatory provision called "alternative redress". This allows a bank, in specified circumstances, to assume that customers to whom it wrongly sold single-premium PPI policies would have bought a cheaper, regular premium PPI policy instead. BBC NEWS

‘FTSE 100 is trading at 9000’: Santander fined £12.4m for mis-sold investments
The fine comes after the regulator conducted a year long mystery shopping exercise in 2012 across the UK’s banking sector. The watchdog said it had unearthed shortcomings in the Spanish-owned bank’s advice on Isas, pensions and investment plans. In a 53-page report a series of failures are highlighted by the regulator. The most eye-catching and disturbing is that financial advisers working at Santander branches incorrectly told customers the FTSE 100 was trading between 8000 and 9000 at the height of the financial crisis in 2008. At the time the UK’s main stock market index was trading at just over 5000. Other misleading advice statements included customers being told their investments would probably double, while others were told their investment returns were guaranteed. Overall the mystery shop found 22pc of advisers provided misleading product information, while 28pc gave misleading answers on costs. TELEGRAPH

Thousands of schools shut by NUT strike
Thousands of schools in England and Wales were closed on Wednesday, as teachers joined picket lines in action over pay, pensions and conditions. The NUT has been embroiled in its current dispute with the government over pay, conditions and pensions for more than two years, and staged a series of regional strikes, together with the NASUWT teaching union, last year. BBC NEWS

Energy companies 'charge loyal customers £90 more than those who have switched to them'
Households that have not changed supplier since privatisation are paying more for their energy than they need to because the biggest companies add a surcharge to their tariffs, the think tank IPPR claimed. The IPPR’s analysis also found electricity bills in 2013 for customers who had not switched were £27 higher than for those who had. It said the different amounts paid for gas by those who had and had not swiched had trebled since 2010, rising on average from £26 to £76. IPPR said: ‘Ofgem has shown itself to be incapable of taking the action that is necessary to get the energy market working in the interests of consumers. In the four years since Ofgem launched a major review into whether competition is effective in energy, the surcharge on gas prices has increased substantially.” DAILY MAIL

Britain is facing a housing disaster as it is one million homes short, warns new report
Britain is now one million homes short of meeting its housing needs – a decade on from the flagship Barker Review of Housing Supply. The 2004 report by Kate Barker, commissioned by the then Labour government, found that 210,000 homes needed to be built each year to prevent a housing crisis. The economist also set a more ambitious target of ‘improving the housing market’ and making property more affordable by building 260,000 homes a year. But a follow-up report shows that an average of just 115,000 homes a year have been built since then – meaning the country is 953,000 homes short of one target and 1.45million short of the other. DAILY MAIL

Vince Cable warns 30 biggest firms over executive payouts
The business secretary Vince Cable’s intervention comes after a string of banks revealed lavish rewards for their top staff despite weak results. Barclays announced it would pay 481 employees £1m or more after a year when profits fell by a third and shareholders' dividends were flat; top managers at Lloyds will share £27m in bonuses even though the bank – 33% owned by the taxpayer – remains engulfed in mis-selling scandals. British bosses now earn 133 times more than the average pay of their workforce, according to the High Pay Centre, and top pay has quadrupled in the last decade. Cable is concerned that some companies are ignoring the spirit of sweeping reforms introduced in 2013 to promote transparency in the boardroom. Shareholders now have a binding vote on remuneration policy once every three years and companies must take into account the pay and conditions of the average employee when setting executive pay. Cable’s calls for further reform are set to cause alarm among some shareholder groups while annual reports revealing this year's pay are still at the printing presses. GUARDIAN

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Tuesday, March 25, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , ,

SOURCE BBC NEWS: Pension reform: Ten hidden consequencesA huge change in the way people fund their retirement is expected following the chancellor's "pension revolution". Under the proposals, from next year millions of people reaching retirement age will be able to spend their pension pot in any way they want. The move, announced in the Budget, will remove the requirement on many people with defined contribution pensions to buy an annuity, a financial product that guarantees an income for the rest of your life. The government says that the overhaul will give retirees more flexibility to do what they want with their pension savings, but Labour says this policy has the potential to be "reckless". We list the potential hidden consequences.
SOURCE TELEGRAPH: Rip-off pension fees 'cost savers £27bn', says OFT
In a mammoth report, the Office of Fair Trading declared the £275 billion pensions industry has short-changed and bewildered savers and employers alike with workplace pensions that carry a complex web of up to 18 different hidden fees. The highest annual fee in the market is 2.3% (consuming 50% of your pension pot) and the lowest 0.05%. Across the industry, some 14% of schemes, holding £40 billion of assets, were judged to be poor value for money. Previous research by the Telegraph found that hidden fees and charges meant workers pension savings can be 50% smaller than those on the Continent, despite saving the same amount.

SOURCE DAILY MAIL: Pensions annuities risk causing the next big financial mis-selling scandal, says Conservative MP
Gloucester MP Richard Graham raised concerns about consumers’ ability to fully understand the annuities products they were offered, adding many were not clear about the fees they would have to pay. He said: ‘Since this is potentially the second biggest financial purchase of our lives, I believe the state of things is worrying.’ Mr Graham referred to a recent seminar on annuities, which he chaired, during which he asked the Association of British Insurers if there was a danger of any of its members being sued for mis-selling. ‘There was a long pause before the answer came: 'Not yet'', the MP said today.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Sunday, 23 March 2014

Chancellors of her Majesty's Exchequer are programmed to produce fists full of lolly in the year before an election. John, Norman, Ken, Gordon and Alistair did it. George Osborne was no different in the 2014 Budget. Chancellors in the year before an election produce lolly like the Child Catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.



The biggest lolly George is handing out in the 2014 Budget is our pension pots. Up until this brightly wrapped idea we were required to give at least 75% of our pension pots to pension companies, by buying an annuity. Now Osborne says we can take the money ourselves and do the right thing with it for our old ages.

This is of course a change of heart from Osborne. In the 2012 Budget Osborne thought pensioners were just simple souls. He said:

“We should also simplify the age related allowances - which the Office of Tax Simplification have recently highlighted as a particularly complicated feature of the tax system…The National Audit Office points out that many pensioners don't understand them."

Osborne's idea of ‘simplifying’ the age related allowances was to scrap them completely. A move Ros Altmann, the pensions expert, described as follows:


So why has Osborne decided that pensioners who are befuddled by a "tax doesn't have to be taxing" self-assessment form are astute enough to set up an investment programme to provide an income for themselves for the remainder of their lives? It is undoubtedly true that pension companies have been ripping off pensioners for years with rotten annuities. The financial services regulator the FCA reported in 2014 that pension companies swipe £230 million a year from pensioners in this way. But that scam has persisted because successive governments have allowed it to, having skipped every opportunity to legislate and sanction. 

Does Osborne think the best way to get the pension company wolves away from the pensioners’ doors is to take away the doors?

Or has Osborne learned from Gordon Brown, and from the banks?
  • Gordon taught George: A key factor in the boom that led to the Banking Crash of 2008 was people borrowing on their property. Let them liquidate their assets!
  • The banks taught George: Giving people large chunks of money (in the form of £20billion compensation for their PPI rip-off) will boost the economy.
In Britain the two great stores of wealth are property and pension pots. And of the two the pension pots are by far the greater. Figures from the Office of National Statistics show this:


Just as Brown fuelled a boom by helping people spend their houses, Osborne plans to fuel a boom by letting people spend their pensions.

A graph from a report by the IFS puts Osborne's generosity into a clearer perspective. A tiny bit of pink icing in the pre-election year floats on a dismal diet of gruel since the previous election. Benefits and tax reforms, according to the IFS, will cost the average "Couple with children, one earner" over £70 a week. And that doesn't even include pay freezes and inflation:



Chancellors of her Majesty's Exchequer are programmed to produce fists full of lolly in the year before an election. John, Norman, Ken, Gordon and Alistair did it. George Osborne was no different in the 2014 Budget. Chancellors in the year before an election produce lolly like the Child Catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.



The biggest lolly George is handing out in the 2014 Budget is our pension pots. Up until this brightly wrapped idea we were required to give at least 75% of our pension pots to pension companies, by buying an annuity. Now Osborne says we can take the money ourselves and do the right thing with it for our old ages.

This is of course a change of heart from Osborne. In the 2012 Budget Osborne thought pensioners were just simple souls. He said:

“We should also simplify the age related allowances - which the Office of Tax Simplification have recently highlighted as a particularly complicated feature of the tax system…The National Audit Office points out that many pensioners don't understand them."

Osborne's idea of ‘simplifying’ the age related allowances was to scrap them completely. A move Ros Altmann, the pensions expert, described as follows:


So why has Osborne decided that pensioners who are befuddled by a "tax doesn't have to be taxing" self-assessment form are astute enough to set up an investment programme to provide an income for themselves for the remainder of their lives? It is undoubtedly true that pension companies have been ripping off pensioners for years with rotten annuities. The financial services regulator the FCA reported in 2014 that pension companies swipe £230 million a year from pensioners in this way. But that scam has persisted because successive governments have allowed it to, having skipped every opportunity to legislate and sanction. 

Does Osborne think the best way to get the pension company wolves away from the pensioners’ doors is to take away the doors?

Or has Osborne learned from Gordon Brown, and from the banks?
  • Gordon taught George: A key factor in the boom that led to the Banking Crash of 2008 was people borrowing on their property. Let them liquidate their assets!
  • The banks taught George: Giving people large chunks of money (in the form of £20billion compensation for their PPI rip-off) will boost the economy.
In Britain the two great stores of wealth are property and pension pots. And of the two the pension pots are by far the greater. Figures from the Office of National Statistics show this:


Just as Brown fuelled a boom by helping people spend their houses, Osborne plans to fuel a boom by letting people spend their pensions.

A graph from a report by the IFS puts Osborne's generosity into a clearer perspective. A tiny bit of pink icing in the pre-election year floats on a dismal diet of gruel since the previous election. Benefits and tax reforms, according to the IFS, will cost the average "Couple with children, one earner" over £70 a week. And that doesn't even include pay freezes and inflation:



Saturday, 22 March 2014

Saturday, March 22, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , , , , ,

“Find the pea” is a favourite street hustler trick. A pea is openly placed under one of three walnut shells, the shells are shuffled, and the pea reappears where it wasn't before.

“Find the tax” works in the same way. You are shown the tax, then it disappears to return somewhere unexpected. A Taxpayers’ Alliance report produced in January 2013 stated the Conservative-LibDem government has implemented 2.5 times more tax rises than cuts since it came into power in 2010 (299 rises and 119 cuts). These include everything from cutting the highest rate of income tax from 50% to 45%, to adding VAT on to the rental of a chair in a hairdresser’s salon. (As the report was published in January 2013, subsequent tax changes aren’t included).



It is evident from these 479 tax shuffles that George Osborne is a pretty adept hustler. He knows it is best to do some things openly so people don't look too hard for the things he does under cover. He openly stated the VAT rise would bring in an additional £13 billion a year (a regressive tax, hitting the poor harder than the wealthy). 

He was more-or-less open with his speedy cut to the 50% top tax rate. A cut made in time to enable the people affected to shift their income – moving it before and after the year of the 50%. A report by HMRC shows that billions of the “affected group’s” income disappeared in 2008-09 to reappear in the year before and the year after the life of the 50% rate.

Somethings George does with curtains drawn and the lights switched off. The much trumpeted increase to £10,500 before people start paying income tax was the shuffle covering a doubling in the tax rate for people earning over £42,285. It had been the custom, between 2004 and 2010, for the threshold for higher rate tax to rise a bit faster than inflation. 
"Inflation Linked" means the threshold if the 2004-05 level had increased with inflation.

However since 2010 this threshold has fallen, such that it is over £6,000 lower than inflation would require. Paying 40% instead of 20% on this £6,000 costs middle earners and extra £1,200 a year in taxes.
"Inflation Linked" means the threshold if the 2004-05 level had increased with inflation.
A report by the Institute of Fiscal Studies suggests that an extra 1.4 million people have been caught in the higher rate between 2010 and 2014.


Giving handouts to 250,000 of the wealthiest by taking more from 1.4 million people on modest incomes makes no electoral sense. So long as the electorate doesn't notice the hustler has hustled the tax out of their earnings.

For your edification, we offer two videos showing expert hustlers. We leave it to you to judge which is the more skillful:

***********************


Saturday, March 22, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , , , , ,

“Find the pea” is a favourite street hustler trick. A pea is openly placed under one of three walnut shells, the shells are shuffled, and the pea reappears where it wasn't before.

“Find the tax” works in the same way. You are shown the tax, then it disappears to return somewhere unexpected. A Taxpayers’ Alliance report produced in January 2013 stated the Conservative-LibDem government has implemented 2.5 times more tax rises than cuts since it came into power in 2010 (299 rises and 119 cuts). These include everything from cutting the highest rate of income tax from 50% to 45%, to adding VAT on to the rental of a chair in a hairdresser’s salon. (As the report was published in January 2013, subsequent tax changes aren’t included).



It is evident from these 479 tax shuffles that George Osborne is a pretty adept hustler. He knows it is best to do some things openly so people don't look too hard for the things he does under cover. He openly stated the VAT rise would bring in an additional £13 billion a year (a regressive tax, hitting the poor harder than the wealthy). 

He was more-or-less open with his speedy cut to the 50% top tax rate. A cut made in time to enable the people affected to shift their income – moving it before and after the year of the 50%. A report by HMRC shows that billions of the “affected group’s” income disappeared in 2008-09 to reappear in the year before and the year after the life of the 50% rate.

Somethings George does with curtains drawn and the lights switched off. The much trumpeted increase to £10,500 before people start paying income tax was the shuffle covering a doubling in the tax rate for people earning over £42,285. It had been the custom, between 2004 and 2010, for the threshold for higher rate tax to rise a bit faster than inflation. 

However since 2010 this threshold has fallen, such that it is over £6,000 lower than inflation would require. Paying 40% instead of 20% on this £6,000 costs middle earners and extra £1,200 a year in taxes.

A report by the Institute of Fiscal Studies suggests that an extra 1.4 million people have been caught in the higher rate between 2010 and 2014.


Giving handouts to 250,000 of the wealthiest by taking more from 1.4 million people on modest incomes makes no electoral sense. So long as the electorate doesn't notice the hustler has hustled the tax out of their earnings.

For your edification, we offer two videos showing expert hustlers. We leave it to you to judge which is the more skillful:

***********************


Friday, 21 March 2014

Friday, March 21, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , ,
KJ, Fee and Chris get their heads round annuities...
SOURCE GUARDIAN: Pension pots 'can be used to buy Lamborghinis', says pensions ministerAffluent people approaching retirement should be free to blow their pension pot on a Lamborghini even if they end up relying on the state for support, pensions minister Steve Webb said on Thursday as the government defended its far-reaching loosening of the rules on annuities in the budget. People on money-purchase pension schemes will no longer be forced to take an annuity – the income guaranteed by pension providers in exchange for receiving all or part of the funds in their pension pot. The chancellor George Osborne believes that the reforms will end what he called the patronising view that people cannot be trusted to invest the funds from their pension pot. Osborne said: "People who saved their whole lives, saved for a pension, these are responsible people … it is their money. They can do what they want."

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Thursday, 20 March 2014

Thursday, March 20, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels:
FirstGroup to be handed Great Western mainline on the cheap
FirstGroup looks set to run the Great Western mainline until the next decade without facing a franchise competition – having earlier handed back its contract to avoid hundreds of millions of pounds in premium payments to the government. Last September the government sparked outrage by awarding first a six-month extension and then a two-year direct award to First for rail services west of London for an annual sum of £32m – a fraction of the £800m due under the terms of the original franchise. The shadow transport secretary, Mary Creagh, said the deals would leave a £300m hole in the DfT's finances. She said: "Ministers have now quietly announced another sweetheart deal with First Great Western Group, no doubt at rock-bottom prices, in stark contrast to their unwanted refranchising of the east coast line, run by a not-for-profit public operator which last year returned £191m to taxpayers." GUARDIAN

UK Statistics Authority says Government claim that Legal Aid barristers earn £84,000 is 'misleading'
In a critical letter to the Ministry of Justice, Sir Andrew Dilnot said the government ignored lower estimates to justify £220m cuts to the legal aid budget in England and Wales. The government figure was published days before a protest by barristers in January. The government said it stood by its figures. On Tuesday, Sir Andrew - who leads the body which monitors the integrity of official statistics - wrote to Legal Aid minister Shailesh Vara and courts saying the report did not specify how the government figure was reached. He said the sum was "potentially misleading" as it was not made clear barristers would have to pay costs and tax out of this. Using a different way of calculating the figures would have produced a lower average, he added. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) disputes the claim, saying barristers actually earn an average of £37,000. BBC NEWS

Income inequality leads to slower economic growth - IMF economists
Income inequality can lead to slower or less sustainable economic growth, while redistribution of income, when measured, does not hurt and can even help an economy, IMF staff found in a research study. Although the study by International Monetary Fund economists does not reflect the Fund's official position, it is another sign of a shift in its thinking about income disparity. "It would still be a mistake to focus on growth and let inequality take care of itself, not only because inequality may be ethically undesirable but also because the resulting growth may be low and unsustainable," according to the study. It has traditionally advised countries to promote growth and reduce debt, but has not explicitly focused on income inequalities. But in the past year, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde has said that creating economic stability is impossible without also addressing inequality. REUTERS

Osborne plans to take 'pay now, argue later' approach with rich tax avoiders
More than £5bn in disputed tax liabilities will be dragged out of the bank accounts of tax avoiders and restored to Treasury coffers, the chancellor claimed. George Osborne hopes a tougher "pay now, argue later" approach to more than 30,000 of the richest and most sophisticated tax avoiders in Britain will help HM Revenue & Customs deal with its costly backlog of dispute cases, while generating revenues to fund measures announced elsewhere in the budget. Among the highest profile avoidance schemes in HMRC's sights are so-called film partnership investments – popular with celebrities, footballers and investment bankers – which generate losses which can be offset against income. GUARDIAN


Osborne cracks down on stamp tax-exempt wealthy 'buy-to-leave' investors
Anyone buying a property for £500,000 or more through a company structure now has to pay a 15% stamp duty charge. The role of overseas investors in stoking London house prices has been a hot topic in recent months. Miles Shipside from the property website Rightmove said some people trying to buy average-priced homes in the capital had been at a disadvantage to investors using corporate structures to escape tax. GUARDIAN

Tory education secretary Michael Gove takes aim at Cameron’s Etonians
Michael Gove, education secretary, has described as “ridiculous” and “preposterous” the concentration of Old Etonians in David Cameron’s inner circle, saying such a bastion of privilege does not exist in any other rich country. Mr Cameron, who went to Eton, numbers four Old Etonians among his inner circle: Oliver Letwin, minister for government policy; Jo Johnson, head of his policy unit; Ed Llewellyn, chief of staff; and Rupert Harrison, George Osborne’s chief economic adviser. Mr Gove drew comparisons between Mr Cameron’s team and the cabinet of the Eton-educated Tory prime minister Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, who was criticised for alleged nepotism and cronyism. “At the beginning of the 20th century, the Conservative cabinet was called Hotel Cecil,” Mr Gove said. “The phrase ‘Bob’s your uncle’ came about and all the rest of it. It is preposterous.” Mr Gove, himself educated at a fee-paying school in Scotland, this month became the first Conservative education minister to send his child to a state secondary school. FINANCIAL TIMES

Bank of England report overturns economic orthodoxy: private banks DO print money
A report by three economists from the Bank of England’s Monetary Analysis Directorate states outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct. The conventional view, which continues to be the basis of all respectable debate on public policy, is that people put their money in banks which then lend that money out at interest. Furthermore, the “fractional reserve system” permits banks to lend out a multiple of what they hold in reserve. What the Bank of England economists admitted this week is that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary: "Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits". In other words, everything we know is not just wrong – it's backwards. When banks make loans, they create money. This in effect pumps IOUs disguised as real money into the economy, and is considered a cause of the global banking crisis. GUARDIAN

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

Tuesday, March 18, 2014 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , , ,

SOURCE GUARDIAN: Councils using lie detector tests that "don't work" to catch benefit fraudstersMore than 20 councils have used or plan to use controversial lie detector tests to catch fraudulent benefits claimants, despite the government dropping the technology because it was found to be not sufficiently reliable. Leading experts in linguistics at Stockholm University said that VRA "does nothing. That is the short answer. There's no scientific basis for this method. From the output it generates this analysis is closer to astrology than science. There was very good work done by the DWP in the UK showing it did not work, so I am surprised." But a number of councils – Redcar, Middlesbrough, West Dorset and Wycombe – said they were convinced of VRA's merits and were considering using it in the future.

SOURCE GUARDIAN: Conservative claims about benefits are not just spin, they're making it upPoliticians are inevitably selective in the data they choose to publicise, picking the figures that best suit whatever story they want to tell. This can mean that stories that are technically accurate can nonetheless be potentially misleading. Within reasonable limits that is in itself neither improper nor unethical: indeed, it is virtually unavoidable. But here are some examples that are not just misleading: they assert that official government statistics say things they do not. Three examples are incapacity benefit, disability living allowance, and the claim the benefit cap is successfully pushing people into work.

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us