TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
GOOD DEBT
PENSION CRAZY
BANKSTER PAY
MPs' 2nd JOBS
TAX IS THEFT?!
FAILING SCHOOLS
AFFORDABLE NHS
1m WORK IN POVERTY
JAIL THE ACCOUNTANTS
RICKETS IS BACK
UN-NATIONALISED RAIL
LOW WAGE BRITAIN
BANK OF MUM & DAD
UK: A PRISONER OF CUTS
TAXING LIES
WATER CANNON BORIS
UNIVERSAL C.. OCKUP
FULL TIME JOBS? WHERE!

Saturday, 18 October 2014

Saturday, October 18, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , , , , , ,
In October 2014 the BBC reported that FTSE100 company directors earned 120 times the average wage. An earnings figure that has shot up sixfold from just 20 times the average wage in the year 2000. 

The BBC also reported that inspite of bumper top wage growth and generally falling unemployment, income tax revenues were going to fall below expectations. Why is this?

The following may provide some explanation:

1) The Bank of England's May 2014 Inflation Report shows that the number of "full time employees" (the dark green lines in the graph below) had not recovered since the 2008 banker induced crash. The 'jobs recovery' is made up mainly of part-time and self-employed jobs.


2) The ONS stated, for April 2013, the average wage for Part-Time workers is far less than Full-Time. Not surprising, as they work fewer hours:
  • Full Time: £517 per week
  • Part Time: £160 per week
3) According to the Resolution Foundation, "the typical self-employed person now earns 40 per cent less than the typical employed person."

4) Even for those who are full time employees, companies have increased their profits by keeping down pay. According to Gavyn Davies, hedge fund manager, former Goldman Sachs partner, and former chairman of the BBC, two thirds of corporate profits come from holding wages down:
 
"[If the] decline in the wage share had not occurred, and everything else had (implausibly) stayed the same, then gross profits in the developed economies would have been about one-third lower than they are today and net profits (after depreciation) would have been about two-thirds lower."

Some will assert high profits are good for you indirectly as corporation tax (paying for public services) and dividends (for pension funds). They hope you don't notice, and perhaps themselves don't realise, for every £10 taken from your paypacket only a fraction comes back in tax & dividends.

5) The Office of National Statistics (ONS) Labour Market Statistics count "anybody who carries out at least one hour’s paid work in a week" as "being employed". Which means people are dropping off the unemployment figures even though they may be earning just £6.50 for one hour's work in a month.

The jobs "recovery" is not really the result of brilliant politicians, businessmen, and austerity bringing employment back to the nation. It is the result of Britons taking even a single hour's work when it is available.

Thursday, 16 October 2014

Thursday, October 16, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
MPs seek inquiry into £1m bonus of disability firm boss
MPs have called for an inquiry into why a charitable scheme providing cars for the disabled paid its chief executive more than £1million in bonuses and benefits last year. Mike Betts, head of not-for-profit company Motability Operations, took home bonuses totalling £911,915 in the year to September 2013, as well as a £125,000 payment in lieu of pension. This was on top of his basic salary of £501,900. Contracted by the Motability charity, the company provides 630,000 vehicles for disabled people, including those injured while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, with customers using their disability benefit payments to pay for the scheme. John Mann, the Labour MP for Bassetlaw, who has examined the scheme’s finances, branded the situation as “scandalous”. He said there was no reason for Mr Betts, 52, to receive such bonuses because the company had no captive market and no competition. The revelation comes as the government implements reforms meaning tens of thousands of disabled people will lose their entitlement to Motability vehicles. Under new, stricter criteria for eligibility, anybody who can walk more than 20 metres, even if this is with the aid of a prosthetic, crutches or walking stalk, will no longer be entitled to a vehicle. TELEGRAPH

British oil giant BG in pay row as new boss Helge Lund lands 'excessive' £29m
After a run of disappointing candidates, the company insisted it had to pay top whack to get a man suitable to lead the company. It has poached Helge Lund from Norwegian rival Statoil with a package that has been criticised as ‘excessive’. He will be paid £1.5million a year, as well as bonuses worth up to £3million and another share incentive scheme that could pay out up to £9million if he hits performance targets. Additionally, he could get another £12million in shares over the next five years if the pay committee decides he is doing a good job. This particular measure is so controversial that the company shareholders are being asked to vote for it at a special meeting. BG will also generously compensate Lund for the potential share awards he is leaving behind at Statoil to the tune of £3million. He is also being given £480,000 to move his family to Britain, and will have £450,000 a year put into his pension pot. Andrew Gould, BG’s executive chairman, defended the pay deal, saying: ‘The company needs a proven leader from the oil and gas industry to deliver the exceptional opportunities available to it.’ BG shares fell 10p to 1015p. DAILY MAIL

Ireland to close notorious ‘double Irish’ tax loophole
Apple and other multinationals based in Ireland are to be given a four-year window before the phasing out of a scheme that cuts their tax bills. Amid mounting international criticism of the arrangements, which save foreign companies billions of euros, Ireland’s finance minister, Michael Noonan, is expected to announce the end of the “double Irish” scheme when he delivers his budget on Tuesday. The European commission is investigating “sweetheart” tax deals between the Irish state and Apple, and last month Brussels provisionally found that the iPhone maker’s tax arrangements in Ireland were so generous as to amount to state aid. Noonan’s move may pre-empt measures hinted at by the UK chancellor last month, when he announced a crackdown on technology firms’ tax strategies at the Conservative party conference. George Osborne said: “Some of the biggest technology companies in the world … go to extraordinary lengths to pay little or no tax here … We will put a stop to it.” Party officials briefed that he had companies using the double Irish scheme in his sights. On the international stage, the G20 group of powerful economies has commissioned the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development to produce a package of tax reforms to rein in multinationals. This work is expected to be completed by summer 2015. GUARDIAN

About time? 2014 Nobel Prize for Economics awarded for “analysis of market power and regulation"
Jean Tirole has been named as 2014's winner of the Economics Nobel prize, for his work on the regulation of large companies. The French professor’s research has been central to the study of regulation in economics, since he began work in the area in the early 1980s. He has helped economists and policymakers to understand how best to regulate large firms, especially where regulators face “asymmetric information” - where they do not have access to the same knowledge as the firms they seek to regulate. Before Mr Tirole’s work, policymakers often favoured blunt tools, such as price caps, while Mr Tirole has advocated more sector specific and tailored approaches - smarter approaches to writing rules. Pierre Moscovici, France’s former finance minister, said that Mr Tirole’s work “informs the paths we need to follow to get out of the crisis”. TELEGRAPH


Richest 1% of people own nearly half of global wealth, says Credit Suisse report
The richest 1% of the world’s population are getting wealthier, owning more than 48% of global wealth, according to a report published on Tuesday which warned growing inequality could be a trigger for recession. The report said: “...abnormally high wealth income ratios have always signaled recession in the past”. The Credit Suisse analysts pointed to the debate that has been sparked by work such as that by Thomas Piketty into long-term trends towards inequality. It pointed out that while inequality had increased in many countries outside the G7, within the group of most developed economies it was only in the UK that inequality had risen since the turn of the century. Globally, a person needs just $3,650 – including the value of equity in their home – to be among the wealthiest half of world citizens. However, more than $77,000 is required to be a member of the top 10% of global wealth holders, and $798,000 to belong to the top 1%. The findings were seized upon by anti-poverty campaigners Oxfam which published research at the start of the year showing that the richest 85 people across the globe share a combined wealth of £1tn, as much as the poorest 3.5 billion of the world’s population. GUARDIAN

More fake debt collectors: Water firms use 'unacceptable' debt collection tactics
The letters appear to be from an external debt agency, but are actually from the water companies themselves. The news follows the revelation of similar practices in banks, energy firms and the payday lender, Wonga. The water companies say they have a duty to tackle bad debt and the letters are sent only as a last resort. Twelve of the UK's largest water suppliers admitted that they had taken part in the practice, while five said they are still doing it or might continue to do so in future. Typically, the name of the debt collection company appears in large print at the top. Often the small print reveals it is linked to the water company, but sometimes no link is made. The energy regulator Ofgem, which has reviewed similar practice by energy suppliers, said that type of layout is still "unacceptable". The water watchdog Ofwat has written to companies saying the same principles should apply to them. As a result, Yorkshire Water says it has "temporarily changed" its approach. But it defended the practice. Other water companies including Northumbrian Water, Affinity Water and Welsh Water stopped sending such letters earlier this year. But the UK's biggest domestic water supplier, Thames Water, is among those continuing with the practice. Its letters, headed County Wide Collections, now state in three places that it is part of Thames Water group. Previously no such link was made. "We try hard to engage with our customers in arrears. This is a long process, but our open and transparent letters do increase in severity," said a Thames Water spokesperson. "When it gets to a final letter, we have found the use of an internally branded debt collection agency approach to be effective and cost-efficient," he added. Ofwat says customers must not be misled or scared into making payments. BBC NEWS

Prison staff shortages approaching tipping point, says top governor
Jails across England and Wales are facing an unprecedented “toxic mix” of increasing prisoner numbers, chronic staff shortages and rising violence that is driving them towards instability, prison governors have warned. Eoin McLennan-Murray, the outgoing president of the Prison Governors’ Association, dismissed claims by the justice secretary, Chris Grayling, that although jails faced pressures they did not amount to a crisis. In his valedictory address on Tuesday, McLennan-Murray said that in his 36 years in the prison service he had never known a situation “as challenging, tough and difficult and as bad as it is now”, in the wake of a 30% reduction in prison staff numbers and much harsher rhetoric from ministers. McLennan-Murray said “desperate measures” were being taken to deal with gaps left by the shortage of prison officers, including shipping people from one part of the country to another on detached duty at a cost of £500 a week for a hotel in the south of England. GUARDIAN

Cheapest tickets across English football rises at almost twice the rate of the cost of living since 2011
The average price of the cheapest match-day ticket from the Premier League to League Two is now £21.49. It has increased 13% since 2011, compared to a 6.8% rise in the cost of living. Year-on-year it is up 4.4%, more than treble the 1.2% rate of inflation. In the Football League, the average cost of the cheapest match-day ticket increased 31.7% in League One and 19% in League Two. In the Championship, the average price fell 3.2%. Critics of the price hikes said clubs had lost touch with fans and argued that the recent £3.1bn windfall from television rights should have resulted in a drop in ticket prices for supporters. But some clubs, particularly those in the Premier League, point to packed-out stadiums as proof they have got pricing right. This summer financial analysts Deloitte said Premier League clubs now spend 71p on wages for every £1 generated, the first time the 70p mark had been broken. Match-day revenue increased by 6% in the Premier League last season to £585m. Arsenal have the most expensive match-day ticket in the Premier League at £97. That's down £29 on last season but still more than double the most expensive match-day ticket at seven other top-flight clubs. The BBC’s “The Price of Football” is in its fourth year and is the largest study of its kind in Britain, covering 176 clubs across 11 division in British football and 31 clubs from 10 different leagues in Europe. As well as ticket prices, information was gathered about the price of replica shirts, pies, programmes and a cup of tea. For the first time this year Price of Football worked out the cost to supporters for each home goal their team scored. BBC NEWS

Sunday, 12 October 2014

Sunday, October 12, 2014 Posted by Jake 1 comment Labels: , , , , ,

Our politicians have got into the habit of pulling off shabby tricks to deceive the voters. Even when we don’t know we are being tricked, we suspect we probably are. This is true of Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and the rest. 

For example, is David Cameron’s promise to protect the NHS budget all it seems to be? If you thought "protect" meant we would continue to receive the same level of care, you'd be wrong.

Cameron promised the NHS budget will be protected in “real terms”. Which means its government funding increases in line with inflation. He would like you to presume in 2015 the NHS would be able to do as much as it did in 2010.

The shabby trick here is the NHS is being given the same buying power, but it has to buy more. Even forgetting about new more expensive treatments, it has to buy more because:

  • The population is growing. So for the same money the NHS has to treat more people.
  • The population is aging. Older people need more health care.
1) According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) the UK population will be about 64.8 million in 2015. That would be an increase of 2 million people in the five years since 2010. 

An extra 2 million people will have to be kept healthy in 2015 on no more money in real terms than was available in 2010.

2) ONS figures show in the five years between 2008 and 2013 the survival rate beyond the age of 75 has increased significantly:
  • for men from 68% to 71%
  • for women from 78% to 80%

Unsurprisingly, older people need more healthcare. A report by the consultancy McKinsey stated:

"As one would expect, there was a strong interplay between age and the presence of physical and mental health LTCs [Long Term Conditions]... 64% of the people between the ages of 65 and 74 had two or more physical or mental health LTCs; 39% had three or more. For those age 85 and older, those figures rose to 69% and 46%, respectively."

The McKinsey report goes on to say that 

"Age was a major cost driver and predictor of risk. For example...58% of the people in the very-high-risk category were elderly, compared with 6% of those in the moderate-risk category."

McKinsey states that the cost of treating people in the 'high-risk' (£8,007 per person) and 'very high risk' (£25,587 per person) categories is much higher. So as the population ages and more people move into these riskier categories there is a major impact on the cost of keeping them healthy.

These two factors, the population growing and aging, mean that keeping NHS funding protected in real terms means a major cut in the funds available to keep each of us healthy.

The graph below from a report by NHS England shows how funding is falling behind spending requirements.

We are craftily being weened off our expectations of the NHS. A report by the Independent newspaper says health bosses have considered providing hospital healthcare free, but charging £75 a night "hotel fees" for staying in a ward.

Like a frog in a pan of slowly heated water, we are at risk of being boiled alive without noticing it until it is too late. Our only way out of the pan is by our votes.

The panic in Labour and Tory parties caused by UKIP’s electoral successes in 2014 blind them to their real problem. People don’t trust them. Whether Labour or Tory is in power the majority find themselves stagnating or worse off, while the lucky few are quids in. The LibDems too have disgraced themselves over tuition fees and more. With the 'mainstream' so mucky, where is a voter to go?

Mainstream parties should not look at UKIP to see why British voters are turning away. They should look at themselves.

Sunday, October 12, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , , ,

Our politicians have got into the habit of pulling off shabby tricks to deceive the voters. Even when we don’t know we are being tricked, we suspect we probably are. This is true of Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and the rest. 

For example, is David Cameron’s promise to protect the NHS budget all it seems to be? If you thought it meant we would receive the same level of care, you'd be wrong.

Cameron promised the NHS budget will be protected in “real terms”. Which means its government funding increases in line with inflation. He would like you to presume in 2015 the NHS would be able to do as much as it did in 2010.

The shabby trick here is the NHS is being given the same buying power, but it has to buy more. Even forgetting about new more expensive treatments, it has to buy more because:

  • The population is growing. So for the same money the NHS has to treat more people.
  • The population is aging. Older people need more health care.
1) According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) the UK population will be about 64.8 million in 2015. That would be an increase of 2 million people in the five years since 2010. 

An extra 2 million people will have to be kept healthy in 2015 on no more money in real terms than was available in 2010.

2) ONS figures show in the five years between 2008 and 2013 the survival rate beyond the age of 75 has increased significantly:
  • for men from 68% to 71%
  • for women from 78% to 80%

Unsurprisingly, older people need more healthcare. A report by the consultancy McKinsey stated:

"As one would expect, there was a strong interplay between age and the presence of physical and mental health LTCs [Long Term Conditions]... 64% of the people between the ages of 65 and 74 had two or more physical or mental health LTCs; 39% had three or more. For those age 85 and older, those figures rose to 69% and 46%, respectively."

The McKinsey report goes on to say that 

"Age was a major cost driver and predictor of risk. For example...58% of the people in the very-high-risk category were elderly, compared with 6% of those in the moderate-risk category."

McKinsey states that the cost of treating people in the 'high-risk' (£8,007 per person) and 'very high risk' (£25,587 per person) categories is much higher. So as the population ages and more people move into these riskier categories there is a major impact on the cost of keeping them healthy.

These two factors, the population growing and aging, mean that keeping NHS funding protected in real terms means a major cut in the funds available to keep each of us healthy.

The graph below from a report by NHS England shows how funding is falling behind spending requirements.

We are craftily being weened off our expectations of the NHS. A report by the Independent newspaper says health bosses have considered providing hospital healthcare free, but charging £75 a night "hotel fees" for staying in a ward.

Like a frog in a pan of slowly heated water, we are at risk of being boiled alive without noticing it until it is too late. Our only way out of the pan is by our votes.

The panic in Labour and Tory parties caused by UKIP’s electoral successes in 2014 blind them to their real problem. People don’t trust them. Whether Labour or Tory is in power the majority find themselves stagnating or worse off, while the lucky few are quids in. The LibDems too have disgraced themselves over tuition fees and more. With the 'mainstream' so mucky, where is a voter to go?

Mainstream parties should not look at UKIP to see why British voters are turning away. They should look at themselves.

Friday, 10 October 2014

Friday, October 10, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , ,
KJ, Fee and Chris discover how...

SOURCE HIGH PAY CENTRE: One Law For Them - The runaway growth of executive pay
Leading economist Gavyn Davies has argued that low wage growth accounts for more than two thirds of corporate profits since the 1980s. As a substantial proportion of these profits have been used to pay dividends to shareholders, executives (who are directly paid in restricted shares) have directly increased their pay at the expense of their workers.

SOURCE FINANCIAL TIMES: Gavyn Davies - The real underpinning for equities
In the past, market economies have tended to erode unusually high profit margins through price competition which has restored real wages to their previous trends. That has always been seen as the natural order of things in a capitalist system. But there is no sign of it happening this time. It is important to recognise that similar patterns have been seen not just in the US, but throughout the developed world, starting in the late 1970s. In fact, the gross profit share in the advanced economies has risen by about 10 percentage points of GDP over three decades, and the wage share has fallen by the same amount. The cumulative effect on corporate earnings, and therefore on equity markets, has been enormous. Consider the following. If the 10 percentage points decline in the wage share had not occurred, and everything else had (implausibly) stayed the same, then gross profits in the developed economies would have been about one-third lower than they are today and net profits (after depreciation) would have been about two-thirds lower. This is an enormous upheaval in the distribution of income in the global economy, and it has happened in an almost continuous straight line over the entire period. It seems to have been impervious to every kind of shock, including the decline in inflation, the technology bubble, the arrival of the BRICs, the collapse in the global financial system and two successive Ashes victories for England against Australia.

OUR RELATED STORIES:


Thursday, 9 October 2014

Thursday, October 09, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Dept of Energy & Climate Change fails taxpayer: £16.6bn of Renewable Energy contracts awarded without competition
The government's decision to award billions of pounds of renewable energy contracts without a proper tendering process has left consumers out of pocket, said MPs on the Public Accounts Committee. The five offshore wind and three biomass project contracts were awarded without competition to avoid delays. But  MPs said Decc's own case showed no benefits to awarding contracts early. They added that it was not clear if the early contracts were needed in order to meet 2020 renewable energy targets. The contracts involved a guaranteed "strike price" that the renewable energy producers would receive for the energy that they produced. This strike price was linked to inflation, with consumers picking up the bill if inflation rose when the projects were completed. The MPs criticised the government for failing to challenge developers' claims that the projects would not go ahead without consumers taking on part of the risk. "By awarding contracts worth up to £16.6bn to eight renewable electricity generation projects without price competition, Decc failed to adequately secure best value for customers," said committee chairwoman Margaret Hodge. "Yet again, the consumer has been left to pick up the bill for poorly conceived and managed contracts." BBC NEWS

Supermarkets charge suppliers £80,000 just to get new products on store shelves, fuelling a third of profits
Supermarkets are making as much as a third of their profits from suppliers by demanding the type of charges that have led to the accounting scandal at Tesco. Tesco has admitted that it has overestimated its half-year profit by up to £250million and the overstatement is said to relate directly to the miscalculation of the commercial charges imposed on suppliers. The scale of such ‘commercial income’ – as it is known in the industry – is not spelt out in the financial results of supermarkets and its crucial importance has only begun to emerge in the wake of the Tesco fiasco. The fees include penalty charges for late or incomplete shipments, bonuses for hitting sales targets, refunds for promotional discounts and one-off payments for a multitude of reasons such as launching new products. The fees are lumped in on top of simple retail profits and they can grow to huge sums when large supermarkets are able to negotiate more lucrative deals with their suppliers. It has also come to light that Tesco was rapped at the end of last year by supermarkets watchdog the Groceries Code Adjudicator for unfairly using its size to demand that suppliers pay extra fees to secure the best positions on its shelves. Adjudicator Christine Tacon warned Tesco last December that it should not have been asking for such payments. The ruling followed a formal complaint from trade body the British Brands Group about the charges. A spokeswoman for the Adjudicator said eight out of ten suppliers complained they had experienced issues that could be in breach of the supermarkets’ code of conduct. Supermarkets could face hefty fines – as well as a huge fall in total profits – if widespread abuse is uncovered. DAILY MAIL

Wonga writes off £220m in debts for 330,000 customers
Wonga was required to write off the debts because the industry regulator, the FCA, found that it had granted the loans without checking people could afford the repayments. The checks were found to be so poor that many borrowers had no chance of ever repaying the loan because of their dire financial circumstances, with many living on unemployment or disability benefits. The company, which charges annualised interest rates of up to 5,853% a year and has been accused by MPs of “legal loan sharking”, said it would entirely wipe out loans to 330,000 people, and scrap interest and charges owed by a further 45,000 customers. Some of the loans are understood to be more than a year old and have ballooned from a few hundred pounds to thousands. Wonga’s new chief executive, Andy Haste - who has been brought in to overhaul the tarnished brand – apologised and said Wonga lacked experienced credit professionals and “lent to people we should not have lent to”, adding: “The checks were not sophisticated enough and not strong enough.” Haste replaced Wonga’s founder Errol Damelin, who quit the firm in June. Damelin described Wonga’s interest rate as a “great deal.” The lender, he claimed, used sophisticated algorithms to ensure it did not lend to people who couldn’t afford to repay. Damelin, who founded Wonga in 2006, had hoped to collect a £100m windfall from floating Wonga on the stock market at a suggested £1bn valuation. Sources at the company said plans for a float have been scrapped. Wonga warned investors, already reeling from a 53% fall in profits announced on Tuesday, that the changes will lead to “a material drop in the number of loans to new and existing customers”. GUARDIAN

British homebuyers at back of queue for local flats marketed in Hong Kong
They are just the type of starter homes many first-time buyers are looking for. Priced from £180,000, Galliard Homes is building studio and one-bed apartments minutes from local shops and only a half-hour tube journey from central London. But if you are British, you may find yourself at the back of the queue: Galliard put the flats on sale to investors in Hong Kong one week before they go on sale in the UK – despite a written promise by the developer to give British buyers at least an equal chance. In December 2013 Galliard, along with other major developers such as Barratt and Taylor Wimpey, signed a pledge that they would give UK purchasers an equal chance to buy, amid widespread concern about the number of developments pre-sold to investors abroad. Four months later Galliard – the second biggest housebuilder in London – stood shoulder-to-shoulder with mayor Boris Johnson, with a separate undertaking. “We commit to market the homes in our developments first or first equal to Londoners. New homes on every development by the undersigned companies will be available for sale to Londoners before, or at the same time, as …to buyers from other countries.” Overseas buying of UK apartments has ignited considerable political controversy at a time when critics say Britain is building fewer than half the number of homes it needs for an expanding population. In prime parts of London, almost eight in 10 newly built apartments are sold to overseas buyers, led by the Chinese, with many subsequently left empty. But the developers argue that foreign buyers have invested £2bn in London alone, helping to fund 14,000 affordable homes, 16,000 jobs and £129m in stamp duty payments. GUARDIAN

LIBOR fines allocated to help support 200,000 emergency services personnel and volunteers
The government is allocating nearly £10m to help support 200,000 emergency services personnel and volunteers, funded through LIBOR fines. This funding will be focused on mental health, physical recuperation and bereavement support. It is the first time that LIBOR funding has gone to support emergency services personnel. Over £8m of the funding will go to English charities, with the remaining £1.6m made available to the Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland governments. The LIBOR fund has been raised through fines imposed on banks for misdemeanours and attempted manipulation of financial markets. This latest allocation builds on £35 million of LIBOR funding already given to military good causes in previous tranches, £60 million to support Armed Forces personnel, their families and veterans and a further £10 million per annum which has been earmarked from 2015 to support the Armed Forces Covenant. HM TREASURY

Motorists: huge fall in the price of oil fails to make it to the pumps
The slump in the price of crude oil – down 17 per cent in the past three months – has shattered recent forecasts that assumed rising turmoil in the Middle East would send oil prices soaring. But despite the worst excesses of Islamic State in Iraq and the conflict in Syria, the chaos has done little to interrupt fuel supplies. Motorists however could be forgiven for wondering whether they are benefiting. The average cost of unleaded petrol has dropped in the past three months, but only by 1.6 per cent from 130.79p to 128.5p. Petrol prices lag behind oil price falls, which is why the sharp drop in oil will not been seen at the pumps until this week, according to Brian Madderson, chairman of the Petrol Retailers Association, who predicted a 2p drop in average prices. But forecourt prices never fall at the same rate as oil because so much of the cost is accounted for by duty, fixed at 57.95p a litre. That figure was frozen by Chancellor George Osborne in 2011, with a pledge to leave it unchanged until May 2015. But with Treasury coffers still stretched, Madderson fears a future government of whatever colour will be tempted to unleash petrol duty rises again next summer. DAILY MAIL

HMRC uses psychologists and behavioural economics to inspire guilt in taxpayers
Following a trial with more than 100,000 people, HMRC said it had "pinpointed the exact words and concepts" which trigger people to pay, leading to an estimated £210m of additional income to the public purse each year. Phrases such as "nine out of ten people in the UK pay their tax on time", or "most people with a debt like yours have now paid it" have been added to the letters. Often, local comparisons were used to encourage people to pay up. Mentioning public services in letters also increased payments, especially for those with large debts. People with debts of £3,000 were found to be 20% more likely to respond to letters which mentioned public services than those which did not. As a result, the wording of thousands of letters from HM Revenue & Customs to tardy taxpayers has been "subtly altered" with the aid of psychologists to inspire guilt. The letters include statements highlighting how the "great majority" of people pay their taxes on time while also setting out the importance of taxes in funding public services. A similar "nudge" method is being used to encourage potential tax evaders to clarify their tax position and pay up any outstanding liabilities. Those who fail to respond will be the subject of a full-scale inquiry. ACCOUNTANCY AGE

Tuesday, 7 October 2014

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , ,
We at Ripped-Off Britons don't think much of politicians generally. But we try to give them the benefit of the doubt if we can.

When David Cameron, in his speech to the Tory Party Conference in October 2014, said we are "a country that is paying down its debts", was he fibbing or (giving benefit of the doubt) did he actually believe it?

The Tories had already made this statement in 2013, and were politely slapped down by Sir Andrew Dilnot pointing out that the national debt, far from being paid down, had continued to rise.
“The latest National Statistics on Public Sector Finances, published on the morning of 22 January 2013, show that public sector net debt (excluding the temporary effects of financial interventions) at the end of the second quarter of 2010 (June) was estimated to be £811.3 billion, representing 55.3 per cent of Gross Domestic Product, rising to £1,111.4 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2012 (December) (70.7 per cent of GDP).”

Cameron, making the same false claim at the 2014 Tory Party Conference, got virtually the same telling off from Sir Andrew with the figures updated to reflect the passage of time since the previous rebuke. Figures showing that the £1,111.4 billion debt of December 2012 had increased to £1,432.3 billion by August 2014.

“The latest National Statistics on Public Sector Finances, published by the Office for National Statistics on 30 September 2014, show that Public Sector Net Debt (excluding public sector banks) as at the end of June 2010 was estimated to be £997.4 billion (equivalent to 64.0 per cent of Gross Domestic Product) and £1,432.3 billion at the end of August 2014 (79.1 per cent of GDP),an estimated increase of £434.9 billion over the period.


In this second letter, Sir Andrew helpfully provides a graph showing by how much the country's debts has increased each year since 2010:

Why do politicians repeat fibs when they know they will be pointed out by independent credible people? Either it is because they think we, the electorate, are too stupid to understand, or it is because they are too stupid to know they are fibbing.

So, what would you prefer?
1) A Prime Minister who has so little respect for the electorate that he comes up with precisely the same fib year after year?
OR
2) A Prime Minister who is so economically illiterate that he actually believes the country is "paying down its debts"?

OR
3) A different Prime Minister? 

Saturday, 4 October 2014

Saturday, October 04, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , ,
According to a report produced by the UK Parliament immediately after the Scottish Independence Referendum of September 2014, the strongest correlation with voting "Yes" to escape the grasp of the United Kingdom was unemployment. The higher the percentage of people claiming out-of-work benefits, the higher the "Yes" vote for independence.

As Bill Clinton realised, when he won the 1992 US Presidential Election, it's "the economy, stupid". Not the national economy, but the personal household economies of millions of families across the UK.

How will this play out in the coming General Election? Having endured five years of "all in it together" austerity, which has proved beyond doubt that we really aren't all in it together, which way next?

The UK has 9 of the 10 poorest regions in Northern Europe, as well as the richest (London).



London and the South East continue to take the lion's share of the UK economy, according to figures from the Office of National Statistics.

The greatest economic benefits of the HS2 high speed rail link will go to London, according to a report by HS2 Ltd (a company wholly owned by the Department of Transport). 

With 47% of those who graduated in the last 5 years, owing thousands in student loans, doing non-graduate jobs (ONS figures):


With continuing programmes of outsourcing pushing wages down, such as the 25% cuts in salary to outsourced London Borough of Barnet staff:


And with government freezing benefits, claiming it is unfair for benefits to rise faster than wages. When benefits for the working poor are needed even more precisely because their stagnant wages are being eroded by inflation:

Politicians say we must all take some pain for the national economy to gain. The reality is it is not everyone who is taking the pain, and it is not everyone who will see the gain.

As Mervyn King said when he was Governor of the Bank of England


"The price of this financial crisis is being borne by people who absolutely did not cause it…..Now is the period when the cost is being paid, I'm surprised that the degree of public anger has not been greater than it has."

Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, in evidence to the UK Parliament’s Treasury Select Committee, March 2011.


Thursday, 2 October 2014

Thursday, October 02, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
“Google Tax”: George Osborne tells tech giants 'We will make you pay your taxes'
In an ardent speech before the Conservative party conference, George Osborne said that some multinational technology firms go to "extraordinary lengths" not to pay tax in the UK. "You are welcome here in Britain with open arms," said the Chancellor to those firms. "While we offer some of the lowest business taxes in the world, we expect those taxes to be paid… If you abuse our tax system, you abuse the trust of the British people," he continued, vowing to stop such abuses. New legislation will prevent global technology firms from doing what is known as a 'double Irish' - in short, using artificial arrangements to divert profits to offshore tax havens that have been earned in the UK. Companies such as Google have faced grillings by politicians on the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee over why they appear to pay low rates of tax in the UK. Google was branded "devious" and accused of operating "smoke and mirrors" when it appeared before the PAC last year, charges which the company denied. TELEGRAPH


Apple may have to repay billions from Irish government tax deal
Apple’s international headquarters are based in Knocknaheeny, a run-down northern suburb of Cork. Two-thirds of Apple’s global profits for 2011 were attributed to companies registered in Cork. Apple says that it pays all taxes due. EU Commission experts say it paid just 3.7% tax on non-US profits of $31bn (£19bn) last year. The European commission has formally opened an investigation into the Irish deal.  The outgoing competition commissioner, Joaquín Almunia, said the commission’s preliminary investigation suggests that deals made between Apple and the Irish government in 1991 and 2007 “constitute state aid” and that “the commission has doubts about the compatibility of such state aid with the internal market [in the EU]”. He said that a deal which replaced them in 2007 also breaks the rules. Apple has also come under fire in the US for its complex tax arrangements, under which a company called Apple Sales International, which until 2012 had no employees and was controlled by a US-based board, is based in Ireland – where in 2011 it paid taxes of $10m on revenues of $22bn from non-US-based Apple activities, a rate equivalent to 0.045%. Senator Carl Levin, who published a damning report on Apple’s tax practices last year, issued a strong statement in support of the investigation. “The facts are abundantly clear: Apple developed its crown jewels – lucrative intellectual property – in the United States, used a tax loophole to shift the profits generated by that valuable property offshore to avoid paying US taxes, then boosted its profits through a sweetheart deal with the Irish government,” said Levin, who chairs the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Over 40 multinationals – including Amazon, Google and software security group McAfee – have operations in and around Cork, bringing 100,000 jobs to the area, according to Conor Healy, chief executive of the Cork chamber of commerce. GUARDIAN


Banks face paying out billions to more than 12million customers after landmark legal battle against Lloyds over 'unfair' £750 fine for customer who was just £2.67 overdrawn
Oliver Foster-Burnell from Taunton, Somerset, went a few pounds over his £500 limit with Lloyds while he was in between jobs in 2008. Within weeks, the 28-year-old received a letter saying for that every day since he had been charged £20 by the bank. The fees spiralled to £750 before Mr Foster-Burnell was able to find a way out of his financial mess. But, after settling his debts, he took his case to county court where a judge ordered the bank to pay back the fees with interest. His victory could pave the way for billions to be returned to customers in similar situations if Mr Foster-Burnell is able to convince a High Court Judge that his case could apply to others. If successful, banks could face returning as much as £30billion to 12.6million customers, according to a study by The Office of Fair Trading. DAILY MAIL


Household energy bills rise 4% while price paid for gas and electricity by Big Six suppliers falls by up to 20%
Consumer organisation Which? executive director, Richard Lloyd, said: 'The Competition and Markets Authority should now investigate how the independent regulator could establish a price people can trust that will spur suppliers to compete and reassure worried consumers that they're not being ripped off.’ MPs also discovered earlier this month that energy customers face a £215 bill for the installation of smart meters that will only save them around 3 per cent on their average annual bill by 2030 – a much smaller saving than had been predicted. Public spending watchdog, the Commons public accounts select committee, estimated the smart meter rollout will cost £10.6billion for the actual meters, with households forking out up to £11 running costs a year, plus the £215 cost of installing the meter. DAILY MAIL


Lloyds sacks eight traders over Libor and other rate rigging scandal, and claws back £3million in bonuses in the process
Lloyds dismissed the traders over attempts to rig the Libor interest rate and another rate used to calculate what the bank paid to use a government scheme designed to help save it from collapse during the depths of the banking crisis. Sources familiar with the situation said that the laws on recouping bonuses made it impossible to claw back payouts, worth millions more, that have already been pocketed. But the sacked bankers could face further financial penalties, bans from working in the City, or even criminal prosecution, amid ongoing probes by the Serious Fraud Office and City regulator the Financial Conduct Authority. Lloyds was initially investigating some 22 staff, four of whom have since returned to work after being exonerated by an internal probe. A further 10 have escaped without any punishment because they left the bank before it could claw back any bonuses or other payouts for misconduct. The bank was slapped with fines adding up to £218million by US and UK regulators earlier this year, after dealers tried to manipulate the Libor inter-bank lending rate and the Sterling repo rate. Chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio sought to draw a line under wrongdoing at Lloyds, in the light of what he called ‘totally unacceptable behaviour’. The FCA is understood to be considering further action against the Lloyds staff, which could include bans from working in the City or fines worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. And the Serious Fraud Office, which has brought criminal charges against 12 people in connection with rigging Libor, is thought to be considering further prosecutions. Banking analysts still expect billions of pounds in new fines, with Barclays, RBS and HSBC expected to join a settlement of up to £1.8billion with six firms accused of foreign exchange manipulation. Analysts at Bank of America said Barclays, RBS and HSBC were facing £14billion in future fines, when including issues such as RBS’ role in the sale of US mortgage-backed securities widely seen as a key trigger for the global financial meltdown of 2008. DAILY MAIL


Wonga profits nosedive by 53% as it counts the cost of fake legal letter scandal - and reveals it will now be 'smaller and less profitable'
Pre-tax profits fell to £39.7million and the company said it expects to be 'smaller and less profitable' in the near term while it cleans up its image and reshapes its business. It said the slide in profits was due in part to a one-off charge in relation to the fake letter scandal earlier this year. Wonga sent thousands of bogus letters from made up law firms 'Chainey, D'Amato & Shannon' and ‘Lowe Legal Recoveries' to mislead customers into believing their outstanding debt had been passed to lawyers, it was revealed in June. It was forced to pay £2.6million in compensation to the customers. The FCA is also bearing down on providers of short-term credit, proposing earlier in the summer a cap on payday lending meaning that from next January, interest and fees must not exceed 0.8% per day of the amount borrowed. It also wants to impose a cap on the overall cost of a payday loan so that it cannot exceed 100 per cent of the original sum borrowed. DAILY MAIL


Consumers face 'lost decade' as spending squeeze bites
Annual wage growth is likely to remain well below the 4.5%-to-5% rises seen before the financial crisis struck in 2008, the EY Item Club survey says. This will slow consumer spending growth over the next two years. Median pay in real-terms is forecast to fall from £18,852 in 2008 to £17,827 by 2017, the survey suggests. The Item club, a non-governmental forecaster that uses HM Treasury's model of the UK economy, believes that record numbers of people in work - currently 30.6 million - will act as a brake on wage rises. The report expects the pace of consumer spending growth to be 2% over the next two years, compared to the annual average growth rate of 3.7% during the pre-crisis decade. "Total household incomes have strengthened because more people are in work, but individuals do not have extra money in their pockets," said Martin Beck, the EY Item Club's senior economic adviser. "Real wages are being held back by strong growth in the supply of workers and the fact that firms are facing increased non-wage costs, such as new pension schemes," he added. Mr Beck believes the so-called "squeezed middle" - households containing neither highly-skilled nor low paid workers - will continue to see limited growth in disposable income as pay rises remain below the rate of inflation - currently 1.5% - and competition for jobs remains strong. Younger people in particular face the most pressure on spending, the report concludes, as unemployment among people in their 20s and 30s remains above average and the cost of buying a property continues to rise. BBC NEWS


Top fund manager Neil Woodford says his industry overcharges
One of the country's most successful fund managers has criticised his industry for charging customers too much, and paying its managers too much. Neil Woodford says fund managers often claim to be actively managing a fund, when in reality they are following the herd. This means fund managers don't actively choose which stocks to invest in, but instead tend to follow a big index such as the FTSE 100. However, he says that wiser customers and stricter regulation will lead to lower fees in the future. Mr Woodford set up his own fund in May and has £7bn under management. Neil Woodford is considered in the industry as one of the country's best performing fund managers. He puts that down to always taking a long-term view on his investments, arguing that most fund managers take a far too short-term approach. "Fund managers are constrained by the fear that if they were to underperform the index for a three, six or 12 month period, their careers would be in jeopardy," he said. As a result, Mr Woodford argues, they are reluctant to buck the trend or invest in start-ups. BBC NEWS


Banking regulator FCA may fine banks £2bn for currency-rigging
The City regulator has this week held secret talks with some of the world's biggest banks about a settlement for the manipulation of global foreign exchange markets that could cost the lenders a total of around £2bn in fines. The banks, which also include Barclays, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Citi, JP Morgan and UBS, would pay different sums, depending on the gravity of their traders' alleged efforts to artificially move foreign currency rates. However, a person close to the talks said the FCA had informed some of the banks' lawyers that the smallest of the penalties imposed for foreign exchange-rigging were likely easily to outstrip the biggest of the fines it has so far handed out for manipulation of the interbank borrowing rate Libor. Such an outcome would chime with a warning from Martin Wheatley, the FCA chief executive, in February, when he told MPs that allegations about collusion to rig prices in the $5.3tn (£3.25tn) spot market were "every bit as bad as they have been with Libor". The largest fine dished out by the FCA for Libor-rigging to date was £160m paid by UBS in December 2012. SKY NEWS


For every fatal accident, 100 construction workers die from a work-related cancer
During a month long initiative, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) will carry out unannounced visits to sites where refurbishment projects or repair works are underway. From 22 September, HSE Inspectors will ensure high-risk activities particularly those affecting the health of workers, are being properly managed. These include working with harmful dusts such as silica and asbestos, and other hazardous substances. If unacceptable standards are found Inspectors will take immediate enforcement action. HSE is urging industry to ‘think health’ as over 30,000 construction workers are made ill by their work every year. Philip White, HSE Chief Inspector of Construction, said: “Industry has made much progress in reducing the number of people killed and injured in its activities, but for every fatal accident, approximately 100 construction workers die from a work-related cancer. During the recent health initiative, enforcement action was taken on one in six sites.  Time and again we find smaller contractors working on refurbishment and repair work failing to protect their workers through a lack of awareness and poor control of risks. This isn’t acceptable – it costs lives, and we will take strong and robust action where we find poor practice and risky behaviour.” HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us